Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2023 May 17;617(7962):818–826. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06061-0

Extended Data Fig. 7. MYC directly regulates GCDH expression.

Extended Data Fig. 7

a, Diagram depicting the screening strategy to identify enriched TFs with selective dependency in GSCs.

b, 12 overlapped TFs responsible for DEGs between GSCs and DGCs/NSCs among the top 20 enriched TFs.

c, Top 20 upstream regulators for GCDH transcription, ranked by regulatory potential (RP) score from BETA algorithm. Each dot represents a ChIP-seq sample with analysed TFs labelled on the X axis. TFs with high RP scores are more likely to regulate GCDH.

d, Venn diagram showing the overlapped TFs.

e, MYC ChIP-seq tracks at GCDH gene locus in 8 human cell lines from ENCODE database.

f, The promoter of GCDH harbours a conserved MYC-binding element.

g, h, Correlation between GCDH and MYC mRNA (g) or signature (h).

i-k, RT-qPCR (i, k) and IB (j) analysis of steady-state mRNA, nascent transcripts or protein of GCDH in GSCs with or without MYC inhibition. NRO, nuclear run-on.

l, Cell proliferation of GSC23 cultured in indicated media and treated with or without 0.2 μM MYCi975 for 5 days.

m, Lysine levels in serum and brain tissues from healthy NSG mice or NSG mice bearing GSC23-derived intracranial tumours after dietary lysine restriction for 4 weeks (n = 4 biologically independent mice).

n, Intracellular lysine levels of GSC23 cultured in indicated media for 5 days.

o, Flow cytometry plots and quantification (n = 4 biologically independent mice) of protein synthesis rate in CD147+ human tumour cells as indicated.

p, IF staining of indicated sections from GSC23-derived intracranial tumours (n = 3 biologically independent mice). N, non-tumour; T, tumour. Scale bar, 20 μm.

Data are presented from three independent experiments in i, k, l and n. Representative of two independent experiments in j. Data are presented as mean ± SEM in i and k-o. Pearson’s correlation with two-tailed test for g and h, one-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons with adjusted p values for i, m and n, two-tailed unpaired t test for k and o, two-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons with adjusted p values for l. ns, not significant.