Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Hepatology. 2020 Jul 6;72(3):1029–1042. doi: 10.1002/hep.31070

TABLE 4.

Twelve- To 60-Month Outcome of 202 Patients With CC Without EV and Sample Sizes Required to Show A 50%, 34%, and 20% Risk Reduction Using an Ordinal Outcome or Two Different Binary (Time-to-Event) Composite Outcomes Including or Not Development of Varices*

Observation Time (Months) and n of Patients With Outcome
Follow-up, months 12 24 36 48 60
Total patients 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202
Outcome (V+/−) V+ V− V+ V− V+ V− V+ V− V+ V−
1 = no progression 194 197 160 185 147 181 142 179 129 172
2 = varices 3 25 35 38 44
3 = bleeding 0 5 2 17 2 20 2 22 3 29
4 = 1st decomp 4 13 16 16 20
5 = 2nd decomp 0 1 1 3 3
6 = death 1 1 1 1 3
Total events 8 5 42 17 55 20 60 22 73 29
Baseline risk 0.04 0.025 0.21 0.08 0.27 0.10 0.3 0.11 0.36 0.14
Total sample size required to show a 50% baseline risk reduction with α = 0.05 and power 0.80
Composite endpoint,§ 2,292 3,705 385 1,115 285 879 250 793 198 565
Ordinal outcome 2,118 354 258 228 176
Total sample size required to show a 34% baseline risk reduction with α = 0.05 and power 0.80
Composite endpoint,§ 5,456 8,838 892 2,638 652 2,074 568 1,869 442 1,322
Ordinal outcome 5,314 864 620 548 418
Total sample size required to show a 20% baseline risk reduction with α = 0.05 and power 0.80
Composite endpoint § 1,7031 27,627 2,726 8,199 1,976 6,432 1,713 5,789 1,317 4,075
Ordinal outcome 16,946 2,692 1,912 1,682 1,264

Differences in sample-size estimates calculated by log-rank (binary) versus ordinal outcome are more marked when varices (without other decompensating event) are considered a nondecompensating event (bolded) and patients are continued in the trial until an overt decompensating event develops.

*

The ordinal outcome includes six categories: grade 1 = no progression; grade 2 = development of varices; grade 3 = bleeding; grade 4 = nonbleeding decompensation; grade 5 = any second decompensation; and grade 6 = death. The two composite endpoints consider the development of varices being or not being part of the outcome (bold delimited areas denote when varices are not considered a negative outcome).

V+/− denotes inclusion or exclusion of development of varices in the composite endpoint.

Sample size has been estimated according to a reduction of risk of 50%, 34%, and 20% (RRs, 0.5, 0.66, and 0.80) by the sample-size software PASS v.11, using the log-rank test (Freedman) procedure: Input parameters were the proportions of subjects free of the events of interest at the end of follow-up in the two arms, assuming none lost to follow-up. This corresponds to slightly different values of HR and OR according to baseline risks (details in the Supporting Information Appendix).

§

Sample size needed for cumulative risk comparison, like in the composite endpoint in the example.

Sample size needed for an ordinal outcome (or ordered categorical variable) according to the test for two ordered categorical variables procedure in Pass v.11. As input parameters, we used the proportion of subjects in the six categories at the end of follow-up, assuming none lost to follow-up, and the natural logarithm of the OR for treatment effect.