TABLE III:
The prediction results of HCP data with different models (mean ± standard deviation).
| Model | Paradigm | PMAT RMSE | p-value | Paradigm | PMAT RMSE | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| LR | rest | 5.0405 ± 0.1228 | <1e-5 | emoid | 5.0786 ± 0.0885 | <1e-5 |
| language | 4.9347 ± 0.0736 | 0.0010 | moto | 4.9889 ± 0.1904 | <1e-5 | |
| wm | *4.8480± 0.0302 | <1e-5 | social | 5.0267 ± 0.1050 | <1e-5 | |
| relational | 5.3336 ± 0.1563 | 1.108e-5 | gambling | 4.9104 ± 0.1109 | <1e-5 | |
|
| ||||||
| MLP | rest | 5.1230 ± 0.0220 | <1e-5 | emoid | 5.0206 ± 0.0067 | <1e-5 |
| language | *4.8807± 0.0046 | 0.0036 | moto | 4.8488 ± 0.0038 | <1e-5 | |
| wm | 4.9068 ± 0.0289 | <1e-5 | social | 4.9811 ± 0.0139 | <1e-5 | |
| relational | 5.1883 ± 0.0173 | <1e-5 | gambling | 4.9050 ± 0.0642 | <1e-5 | |
|
| ||||||
| GCN | rest | 5.1515 ± 0.0457 | <1e-5 | emoid | 5.3406 ± 0.1581 | <1e-5 |
| language | 4.9495 ± 0.0287 | 0.0003 | moto | 5.0865 ± 0.0642 | <1e-5 | |
| wm | 5.0854 ± 0.0506 | <1e-5 | social | *4.8116± 3.6e-5 | <1e-5 | |
| relational | 5.3586 ± 0.1553 | <1e-5 | gambling | 5.0296 ± 0.0593 | <1e-5 | |
|
| ||||||
| GAT | rest | 5.2024 ± 0.0584 | <1e-5 | emoid | 5.0874 ± 0.0041 | <1e-5 |
| language | 5.1928 ± 0.0431 | <1e-5 | moto | *4.7785± 0.0291 | <1e-5 | |
| wm | 5.1237 ± 0.0571 | <1e-5 | social | 4.9302 ± 0.0003 | <1e-5 | |
| relational | 5.4881 ± 0.0987 | <1e-5 | gambling | 4.8727 ± 0.0190 | <1e-5 | |
|
| ||||||
| GT | rest | 4.9170 ± 0.0104 | <1e-5 | emoid | 4.9337 ± 0.0091 | <1e-5 |
| language | 4.9206 ± 0.0083 | 0.0008 | moto | 4.9175 ± 0.0096 | <1e-5 | |
| wm | 4.8937 ± 1.2e-5 | <1e-5 | social | 4.8826 ± 0.0086 | <1e-5 | |
| relational | 5.2106 ± 0.0144 | <1e-5 | gambling | *4.8608± 0.0071 | <1e-5 | |
|
| ||||||
| SAN | rest | *4.8952± 0.0053 | <1e-5 | emoid | *4.9233±0.0047 | <1e-5 |
| language | 4.9186 ± 0.0078 | 0.0008 | moto | 4.9407 ±0.0074 | <1e-5 | |
| wm | 4.8989 ± 0.0039 | <1e-5 | social | 4.8957 ± 0.0078 | <1e-5 | |
| relational | *5.1327± 0.0021 | 0.0001 | gambling | 4.8989 ± 0.0035 | <1e-5 | |
|
| ||||||
| GGCN | rest | 5.5097 ± 0.1026 | <1e-5 | emoid | 5.7735 ± 0.0474 | <1e-5 |
| language | 5.6053 ± 0.2631 | <1e-5 | moto | 5.8380 ± 0.4989 | <1e-5 | |
| wm | 5.7114 ± 0.2643 | <1e-5 | social | 6.2893 ± 0.7541 | <1e-5 | |
| relational | 5.5010 ± 0.0565 | <1e-5 | gambling | 5.9816 ± 0.4169 | <1e-5 | |
|
| ||||||
| GGT | rest | 4.7406 ± 0.0403 | - | emoid | 4.6006 ± 0.0440 | - |
| language | 4.6856 ± 0.1748 | - | moto | 4.5487 ± 0.0888 | - | |
| wm | 4.6568 ± 0.0377 | - | social | 4.4884 ± 0.0386 | - | |
| relational | 4.9416 ± 0.1178 | - | gambling | 4.4327 ± 0.0238 | - | |
p-values are obtained using t-tests to compare the performance of our model with that of other competing models across repeated experiments. Bold values indicate the best results, while those marked with
*
represent the second-best results.