Table 2.

Treatment with sPIF is associated with low weight in male (M) and female (F) WT and Dp(16)1Yey pups on P5 and P11

Weight (g)		Vehicle-treated WT n = 42 M/34F	sPIF-treated WT n = 22 M/18F	Vehicle-treated Dp(16)1Yey n = 40 M/35F	sPIF-treated Dp(16)1Yey n = 16 M/20F
P5	Males	2.93 ± 0.10	2.45 ± 0.13**	2.82 ± 0.09	2.31 ± 0.09
	Females	3.18 ± 0.10	2.64 ± 0.14**	2.75 ± 0.09**	2.34 ± 0.10$
P11	Males	5.82 ± 0.15	4.77 ± 0.24***	5.64 ± 0.10	5.04 ± 0.25
	Females	6.20 ± 0.16	5.32 ± 0.20**	5.59 ± 0.11**	4.83 ± 0.30$

Data are expressed as the mean ± SD and were analyzed in a two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.005 (sPIF-treated WT or vehicle-treated Dp(16)1Yey vs. vehicle-treated WT); $ p < 0.05 (sPIF-treated Dp(16)1Yey vs. vehicle-treated Dp(16)1Yey).