Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 19;17(6):171–184. doi: 10.1007/s12178-024-09894-y

Table 2.

Treatment and outcomes of ultrasound-guided (USG) intrameniscal injections. PRP platelet-rich plasma, OA osteoarthritis, KL Kellgren-Lawrence, MFAT microfragmented adipose tissue, mL, milliliters, PLT, platelet, CaCL2 calcium chloride, KOOS knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, VAS, visual analog scale, NPS numerical pain scale, IKDC international knee documentation committee; MCID minimum clinically important difference, QOL quality of life

Treatment and tear type Author Subjects Procedure details PRP characteristics Outcome measures Responders (%) Change in outcome Follow-up p value (reported)

Intervention:

USG PRP + trephination

Control:

USG trephination

Tear type:

Horizontal cleavage tear

Kaminski 2019 [49]

72

(42 PRP, 30 control)

5–10 passes with continuous injection

120 mL blood draw → 6–8 mL PRP

Activation: CaCL2 and thrombin

PLT and leukocyte calculated but not reported

VAS

MCID:

65 PRP vs 39 control

3.62 ± 0.07 (2.82–4.43) PRP vs 2.36 ± 0.0.09 (3.86–5.20) control Median 92 weeks (range 54–157 weeks) p = 0.027 for mean change, p = 0.046 for MCID responders
KOOS symptom subscale

MCID:

76 PRP vs 48 control

27.93 ± 0.42 (22.89–32.96) for PRP vs 18.38 ± 0.82 (10.81–25.95) for control p = 0.016 for mean change p = 0.028 for MCID responders
Arthroscopy free survival 8% PRP vs 28% control p = 0.032

Intervention:

PRP

Control:

None

Tear type:

Grade 2 Reicher Posterior horn medial meniscus Ahlback 0–1

Özyalvaç 2019 [50]

23

(8 lost to follow-up)

18-gauge spinal

20 mL blood draw to → 4 mL PRP

No activation

“4.75 × baseline”

Lysholm score 71.1 ± 6.9 to 91.9 ± 6.6 31.9 months + / − 5.6 (range 19–45) p < 0.001
MRI meniscal healing, graded on Reicher scale 67

10: Grade 2 → grade 1

4: Grade 2 → grade 2

1: Grade 2 → grade 3

Intervention:

PRP

Control:

None

Tear type:

Stoller grade 1 (2), Grade 2 (4) or grade 3(4) without OA

Guenoun 2020 [51] 10

21- or 25-gauge needle

0.5 mL into meniscus, 1.5 mL into meniscal wall and 2 mL perimeniscal space

18 mL draw → 4 mL PRP

No activation

1.999 billion ± 616 million platelets

VAS 57 ± 11.6 → 36.3 ± 31.1 6 months p = 0.18
KOOS total 56.6 ± 15.7 → 72.7 ± 18.5 p = 0.0007
Return to sport 100
MRI Stable meniscal tears at 6 months in 7/7

Intervention:

PRP

Control:

None

Tear type:

Degenerative medial body or posterior horn

KL: 0–1

DiMatteo 2021 [52] 12

22-gauge needle

3–4 deposits of 0.5–0.8 mL of PRP in meniscus and menisco-capsular junction

2 mL “ACP”

Injection repeated 3 × at 2-week intervals

No activation

No reported dose

VAS 92 6.5 ± 2 to 2.5 ± 2.5 18 months

Baseline to 6 months p = 0.003

6 to 12 months p = 0.004

12 to 18 months stable

IKDC 50.1 ± 18 to 81.6 ± 13.9

Baseline to 6 months p < 0.001

6 to 12 months p = 0.03

12 to 18 months stable

Intervention:

MFAT

Control:

None

Tear type:

Multiple locations and types

OA present in 21/23 knees

Malanga 2021 [53]

20 patients

(23 knees)

18-gauge needle or 22-gauge needle

Trephination performed as described by Baria et al

1–2 mL of MFAT in to tear, “the rest” in the joint NPS 78.9 met MCID 5.45 ± 2.2 to 2.21 ± 2.5 12 months p < 0.01
KOOS

MCID met by:

57.9 for KOOS pain and ADL’s

63.2 for KOOS symptoms

73.7 for KOOS sports/rec and QOL

All KOOS subscales saw statistically significant benefit p < 0.01

Intervention:

PRP

Control:

None

Tear type:

Multiple locations

Horizontal, radial, or complex

Sanchez 2023 [54]

Three injections, every 2 weeks

Injection #1 48 mL blood draw → 10–12 mL (dose 2.1 billion-5.2 billion platelets) intrameniscal + intra-articular

Injection #2 32 mL blood draw → 8mL PRP (dose 1.7 billion–3.5 billion platelets) intra-articular

Injection #3 identical to #1

Activation: CaCl2

KOOS

MCID met by:

69.9 at 6 months

65.2 at 18 months

All KOOS subscales saw statistically significant benefit 18 months p < 0.0001
Survival without arthroscopy 90.3 Mean survival 54.3 months