Abstract
mRNA display of macrocyclic peptides has proven itself to be a powerful technique to discover high affinity ligands for a protein target. However, only a limited number of cyclization chemistries are known to be compatible with mRNA display. Tyrosinase is a copper-dependent oxidase that oxidizes tyrosine phenol to an electrophilic ortho-quinone, which is readily attacked by cysteine thiol. Here we show that peptides containing tyrosine and cysteine are rapidly cyclized upon tyrosinase treatment. Characterization of the cyclization reveals it to be widely applicable to multiple macrocycle sizes and scaffolds. We combine tyrosinase mediated cyclization with mRNA display to discover new macrocyclic ligands targeting melanoma-associated antigen A4 (MAGE-A4). These macrocycles potently inhibit the MAGE-A4 binding axis with nanomolar IC50 values. Importantly, macrocyclic ligands show clear advantage over non-cyclized analogs with ~40 fold or greater decrease in IC50 values.
Graphical Abstract

mRNA display is a powerful tool for discovery of macrocyclic peptide ligands against challenging protein targets.1–4 Macrocyclization typically rigidifies and pre-organizes peptide hits into a high affinity binding conformation. Additionally, macrocyclization tends to contribute to improved stability and cell permeability for potential therapeutic leads or probes.5–7 Key examples include the peptide macrocycles MK-06168–10 from Merck and RA10149511 from UCB Pharma, both of which are derived from mRNA display hits and have advanced in clinical trials. Despite the success of this technology, the list of peptide macrocyclization chemistries available to mRNA display is limited. Current strategies include cysteine alkylation with exogenous dihalo-alkanes,10,12 copper-catalyzed click reactions,13 cysteine attack at dehydroalanines,14 and spontaneous cysteine cyclization onto an N-terminal Nα-chloroacetyl-group.15,16 While extant methods are powerful, new cyclization methods will benefit mRNA display by expanding the diversity of libraries through generation of novel macrocyclic scaffolds17,18 and allowing derivatization of linkages themselves.19
Enzymes could offer new routes for peptide cyclization in mRNA display. Many enzymes function under mild, aqueous conditions. Additionally, many peptide modifying enzymes exhibit high levels of substrate promiscuity20–22 which make them ideal candidates for application to mRNA display. One such enzyme is tyrosinase, an industrially utilized copper-dependent oxidase, which converts tyrosine phenols to electrophilic o-quinones.23 In biological context, the reactivity of o-quinones towards cysteine nucleophiles is essential to formation of melanin and pheomelanin sub-monomers.24–26 Recent work has exploited this chemistry for intermolecular bioconjugation, where the reaction has been found to be selective for ligation at C-5, rather than C-2 position (Fig. 1A).22,26,27 Given the speed and biocompatibility of this conjugation strategy, we wondered whether a suitable tyrosinase might be capable of effecting cyclization of peptides containing tyrosine/cysteine pairs.
Figure 1.

Tyrosinase-catalyzed peptide macrocyclization validation and regioselectivity. A) Comparison of tyrosinase-catalyzed bioconjugation of macromolecules to proposed mRNA display cyclization showing oxidation of tyrosine to o-quinone and subsequent thiol attack. B) Substrate for proof-of-principle experiments including site of incorporation of 3,5-deutero-tyrosine (Y3,5D) and MALDI traces. Treatment with 1 μM megTYR yields predominant cyclization product at C5 (C5:C2 ratio calculated from peak intensity). Product identity can be further validated by BME chase.
Herein we describe tyrosinase catalyzed peptide macrocyclization and its application to mRNA display (Fig. 1A). We explore the substrate scope and regiochemistry of peptide cyclization with megTYR, from the bacterium, Bacillus megaterium,28 and demonstrate compatibility with mRNA display. We further deploy this enzymatic chemistry in the effective selection of new macrocyclic peptide inhibitors of the cancer-testes antigen, MAGE-A4.2,29 This work provides first evidence of the ability to use tyrosinase in peptide cyclization and uncovers key knowledge for the use of tyrosinase, as well as other peptide-modifying enzymes in selection campaigns.
We began our efforts by testing whether tyrosinase could activate and effect in situ cyclization of tyrosine-containing peptides. Previous work suggested that abTYR, from mushroom Agaricus bisporus, might be incompatible with nucleic acid fused substrates but that megTYR does not share this sensitivity.22 Thus, we chose to proceed with megTYR. A model peptide (gene G1, Fig. 1B and Supporting Information) was initially employed to test cyclization in an in vitro context. G1 contains a C-terminal Cys and N-terminal Tyr, the latter of which we replaced with 3,5-deutero-tyrosine under conditions of translation using the PURExpress in vitro translation (IVT) kit. We anticipated that use of 3,5-deutero-tyrosine could simultaneously allow confirmation of cyclization and quantitation of potential C-2 and C-5 cyclized products by relative integration of the A (monoisotopic) and A+1 peaks of the mass spectrum (MS, Fig. 1B). In the event, treatment of the di-deutero G1 peptide, with 1 μM megTYR cleanly afforded the Cys-cyclized product. The mass envelope for this intramolecular cyclization product is consistent with a 2.8:1 mixture of the C-5:C-2 modified products (Fig. 1B and Supporting Information). Exclusive formation of the macrocycle was further confirmed by BME chase experiments to ensure no o-quinone is left. We additionally tested two analogs of this model peptide, each with a different nucleophilic amino acid at the C-terminus: a Ser hydroxyl or Lys amine. Consistent with literature precedent from the intermolecular reaction, neither Ser- nor Lys-containing substrates show cyclization at 1 μM megTyr (Fig. S1 and S2).
We further sought to probe the substrate scope of this cyclization. Employing the same kind of isotope MS assay, we interrogated whether relative positioning of the Cys nucleophile impacted cyclization ability or regiochemistry. The position of the Cys-residue was varied within our model sequence to allow formation of 3-, 6-, or 9-residue macrocycles (Fig. 2A, entries 2–4). We additionally examined whether internal and C-terminal Tyr-residues could also be activated and cyclized (Fig. 2A, entries 5,6). After 1 hour incubation with 1 μM megTYR treatment, all tested peptides exhibited complete conversion to the cyclic products, with varying ratios of C-5:C-2 product, although C-5 remained the major (Fig. 2A and Supporting Information). Collectively, these results suggest that regiochemistry may be context dependent, but that cyclization should be broadly applicable to a variety of macrocycle architectures.
Figure 2.

(A) Table of substrate scope for peptide macrocyclization. A green check indicates complete conversion to macrocyclic mass after 1 hour in presence of 1 μM megTYR. (B) Schematic of biotin capture assay developed to assess substrate promiscuity of tyrosinase activation, including table detailing library used and NGS statistics for the assay. (C) qPCR results of streptavidin captured material (n =3). Samples treated with 125 nM tyrosinase were sent for NGS sequencing. (D) NGS results for average amino acid positional variation at each randomized position of sequences isolated from capture assay. (E) Heat map of positional enrichment of canonical amino acids in single round capture assay.
Given the robustness of the tyrosinase cyclization with tyrosine itself, we also investigated compatibility with tyrosine and phenylalanine analogs. Such analogs might allow for additional scaffold diversity in future display libraries. Thus, we selected a focused panel of 9 analogs, most of which have previously been incorporated via the tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (Fig. 2A, entries 7 – 14).30 Of the amino acid analogs tested, L-Dopa, 3-amino-tyrosine, and 3-fluoro-tyrosine exhibit quantitative expression (Fig. 2A, entries 7–8,10). In contrast, 3-methyl-tyrosine, 3-chloro-tyrosine, 3-bromo-tyrosine, 4-nitro-phenylalanine, and 4-amino-phenylalanine all suffer from background incorporation of trace tyrosine from the translation mixtures (Fig. 2A, entries 9,11–14). Interestingly, 3-amino-tyrosine undergoes facile oxidation/cyclization (Fig. 2A, entry 8). Although 3-amino-tyrosine has previously been characterized as an inhibitor of abTyr, apparently it can be a substrate for megTyr when embedded in a peptide sequence.31 Peptides containing 3-methyl-tyrosine, 3-fluoro-tyrosine, and 3-chloro-tyrosine do not show significant cyclization. These data demonstrate that tyrosine analogs can be used to replace tyrosine in PURExpress IVT to incorporate non-canonical phenolic residues with varied substrate propensities for megTYR.
We next developed a substrate display assay to test compatibility of tyrosinase with mRNA display and assess potential substrate bias. As envisioned, the assay would exploit the intermolecular capture of an mRNA displayed tyrosine with a biotin thiol to report on permissible substrates (Fig. 2B). We designed a small RNA library encoding an N-terminal tyrosine next to a randomized 4-residue sequence. This library was amplified, P-linked, and displayed and, in presence of tyrosinase, in a dose-dependent manner, the library could be efficiently captured with biotin thiol (Fig. 2C-D). We chose to sequence replicates of the library treated with 125 nM tyrosinase, where incomplete modification might patterns in substrate bias. Three key motifs can be gleaned from the heat map of this display data (Fig. 2E): 1) intramolecular cyclization is efficient and outcompetes the intermolecular capture, as indicated by deprecation of Cys residues, 2) proline directly adjacent to the Tyr hinders activation, and 3) some bias toward negative charge, previously noted by Francis et al. is also present here. Nonetheless, there was high sequence diversity recovered and low sequence convergence, suggesting overall broad substrate promiscuity.
We finally sought to integrate tyrosinase-based peptide cyclization into an mRNA display selection against melanoma-associated antigen A4 (MAGE-A4). MAGE-A4 is an exploratory cancer target that has proven tractable to mRNA display selection, as a well-behaved, soluble target, with robust assays in hand.2,29 We next designed a peptide library with 10–12 NNK randomized positions bookended by an N-terminal tyrosine and a C-terminal cysteine (Fig. 3A). The library was translated and treated with megTYR for 1 hour and resulting macrocycle-RNA fusions selected against immobilized MAGE-A4. After 4 rounds of selection, robust enrichment was indicated by qPCR and the cDNA was sent for sequencing (Fig. S4). Sequence analysis resulted in two promising families, representing two distinct macrocycle sizes (Fig. 3B). The top hit represents a family of Cys-to-Ala mutants of the original library with smaller, 4-residue macrocycles at their N-termini, while the second family sustain the larger macrocycles of the initial library. The latter sequences also bear a strong similarity to cyclic MAGE-A4 inhibitors identified in a prior, Flexizyme-based selection (Fig. 3G).2
Figure 3.

mRNA display of tyrosinase-cyclized peptides against MAGE-A4. A) Scheme depicting incorporation of tyrosinase into mRNA display. B) MSA of top two peptide families based on percent NGS composition after 4 rounds of selection. Names refer to linear peptides (c indicates cyclic variant). C) Chemical structures of the cyclized peptide hits chosen for synthesis. D) LCMS traces depicting the difference in retention time between cMCF02A (C5-cyclized) and cMCF02B (C2-cyclized). E) IC50 values for inhibition of FRET between MAGE-A4 and MTP-21 (titration curves in Figure S8). F and G) Docked poses of energy minimized MCF01 (F) and MCF02 (G) to depict predicted binding modes. MCF02 is overlayed on the crystal structure of MAGE-A4-MHD bound to homologous MTP-1 binding epitope [PDB: 7UOA].
To validate the selection, one representative peptide from each family was chosen for synthesis and testing. Small scale assays confirm that both peptides are good substrates for megTYR under selection conditions (Fig. S7), but that MCF02 forms two potential regioisomers in a ratio of 70:30 (Fig. S6). On scale, the enzymatic cyclization products of MCF02 again eluted as two separate peaks of identical mass. Comparison of the retention times to those of products from small-scale reactions with a substrate containing 3,5-deuterated tyrosine, confirmed that the major product, cMCF02A is the C-5 cyclization product and the minor product, cMCF02B, is the C-2 cyclization product (Figs. 3D and S7).25,26 Both regioisomers, as well as cMCF01 and the respective linear precursors were tested in a previously developed TR-FRET assay to assess disruption of the MAGE-A4 binding interaction (Fig. 3E and S8).2 All three macrocycles exhibited potent inhibitory activity with IC50 values in the low nanomolar range, while linear versions were significantly less active. The major, C-5 regioisomer of MCF02 proved more potent than the minor, C-2 isomer by almost 5-fold and the IC50 of the linear precursor shows little or no inhibition up to 10 μM. Linear MCF01 exhibits an IC50 value of 387 nM, while cyclization of the N-terminal region provides an almost 50-fold improvement. Energy-minimized and docked poses of the two peptides suggest that they adopt very different binding modes (Fig. 3F and G). MCF01, while not helical in solution, is predicted to bind in a helical conformation, while MCF02 aligns nicely with the binding pose of MTP-1.
Cumulatively, this work adds a new macrocyclization strategy to the mRNA display toolbox. megTYR can activate RNA-conjugated tyrosine residues towards intramolecular Cys-thiol conjugate addition and cyclization. Cyclization is amenable to various macrocycle sizes and accommodates N-terminal, internal, and C-terminal tyrosine residues. This knowledge allowed us to integrate this chemistry into an mRNA display selection that uncovered three new macrocyclic peptides, cMCF01, cMCF02A, and cMCF02B, all potent nanomolar inhibitors of the MAGE-A4 binding axis. cMCF01, the most enriched sequence from this campaign, is a novel sequence, not seen in the prior campaign, suggesting that this cyclization strategy can elicit new structures. Although this work establishes efficacy, the full scope and capability of the methodology remain to be elucidated. Importantly, multiple tyrosines may not be well tolerated, but supplementing future libraries with tyrosine mimetics by through amber codon suppression or other means could potentially surmount this challenge.30–34 Tyrosine analogs could be particularly helpful in preventing side reactions while promoting library diversity; tyrosine itself could be replaced at internal positions with one of the unreactive analogs, 3-methyl-tyrosine or 3-chloro-tyrosine. Additionally, a better understanding of the substrate promiscuity and/or bias towards this cyclization reaction could be garnered through the more extensive investigation of our substrate display assay, as has recently been employed with several other chemistries adapted for display platforms.35–37 Lastly, although we have focused on megTYR in this work, additional tyrosinase homologs or engineered variants may prove more adept in future applications.22,38
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (GM125005 to A.A.B). The authors would like to thank Christopher Shelby for helpful discussions and generous contributions of reagents.
Footnotes
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information
The Supplemental Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.
Detailed information regarding experimental methods, primers, genes, MALDI-TOF traces, and LCMS characterization (PDF).
REFERENCES
- (1).Haberman VA; Fleming SR; Leisner TM; Puhl AC; Feng E; Xie L; Chen X; Goto Y; Suga H; Parise LV; Kireev D; Pearce KH; Bowers AA Discovery and Development of Cyclic Peptide Inhibitors of CIB1. Acs Med Chem Lett 2021, 12 (11), 1832–1839. 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Fleming MC; Chiou LF; Tumbale PP; Droby GN; Lim J; Norris-Drouin JL; Williams JG; Pearce KH; Williams RS; Vaziri C; Bowers AA Discovery and Structural Basis of the Selectivity of Potent Cyclic Peptide Inhibitors of MAGE-A4. J Med Chem 2022, 65 (10), 7231–7245. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Norman A; Franck C; Christie M; Hawkins PME; Patel K; Ashhurst AS; Aggarwal A; Low JKK; Siddiquee R; Ashley CL; Steain M; Triccas JA; Turville S; Mackay JP; Passioura T; Payne RJ Discovery of Cyclic Peptide Ligands to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Using mRNA Display. Acs Central Sci 2021, 7 (6), 1001–1008. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Dai SA; Hu Q; Gao R; Blythe EE; Touhara KK; Peacock H; Zhang Z; Zastrow M von; Suga, H.; Shokat, K. M. State-Selective Modulation of Heterotrimeric Gαs Signaling with Macrocyclic Peptides. Cell 2022, 185 (21), 3950–3965.e25. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Morrison C Constrained Peptides’ Time to Shine? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2018, 17 (8), 531–533. 10.1038/nrd.2018.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Vinogradov AA; Yin Y; Suga H Macrocyclic Peptides as Drug Candidates: Recent Progress and Remaining Challenges. J Am Chem Soc 2019, 141 (10), 4167–4181. 10.1021/jacs.8b13178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Zorzi A; Deyle K; Heinis C Cyclic Peptide Therapeutics: Past, Present and Future. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2017, 38, 24–29. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Iskandar SE; Bowers AA mRNA Display Reaches for the Clinic with New PCSK9 Inhibitor. Acs Med Chem Lett 2022, 13 (9), 1379–1383. 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.2c00319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Tucker TJ; Embrey MW; Alleyne C; Amin RP; Bass A; Bhatt B; Bianchi E; Branca D; Bueters T; Buist N; Ha SN; Hafey M; He H; Higgins J; Johns DG; Kerekes AD; Koeplinger KA; Kuethe JT; Li N; Murphy B; Orth P; Salowe S; Shahripour A; Tracy R; Wang W; Wu C; Xiong Y; Zokian HJ; Wood HB; Walji A A Series of Novel, Highly Potent, and Orally Bioavailable Next-Generation Tricyclic Peptide PCSK9 Inhibitors. J Med Chem 2021, 64 (22), 16770–16800. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Alleyne C; Amin RP; Bhatt B; Bianchi E; Blain JC; Boyer N; Branca D; Embrey MW; Ha SN; Jette K; Johns DG; Kerekes AD; Koeplinger KA; LaPlaca D; Li N; Murphy B; Orth P; Ricardo A; Salowe S; Seyb K; Shahripour A; Stringer JR; Sun Y; Tracy R; Wu C; Xiong Y; Youm H; Zokian HJ; Tucker TJ Series of Novel and Highly Potent Cyclic Peptide PCSK9 Inhibitors Derived from an mRNA Display Screen and Optimized via Structure-Based Design. J Med Chem 2020, 63 (22), 13796–13824. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Howard JF; Vissing J; Gilhus NE; Leite MI; Utsugisawa K; Duda PW; Farzaneh-Far R; Murai H; Wiendl H Zilucoplan: An Investigational Complement C5 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Acetylcholine Receptor Autoantibody–Positive Generalized Myasthenia Gravis. Expert Opin Inv Drug 2021, 30 (5), 483–493. 10.1080/13543784.2021.1897567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Schlippe YVG; Hartman MCT; Josephson K; Szostak JW In Vitro Selection of Highly Modified Cyclic Peptides That Act as Tight Binding Inhibitors. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134 (25), 10469–10477. 10.1021/ja301017y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Hacker DE; Abrigo NA; Hoinka J; Richardson SL; Przytycka TM; Hartman MCT Direct, Competitive Comparison of Linear, Monocyclic, and Bicyclic Libraries Using mRNA Display. ACS Comb Sci 2020, 22 (6), 306–310. 10.1021/acscombsci.0c00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Hofmann FT; Szostak JW; Seebeck FP In Vitro Selection of Functional Lantipeptides. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134 (19), 8038–8041. 10.1021/ja302082d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Goto Y; Ohta A; Sako Y; Yamagishi Y; Murakami H; Suga H Reprogramming the Translation Initiation for the Synthesis of Physiologically Stable Cyclic Peptides. Acs Chem Biol 2008, 3 (2), 120–129. 10.1021/cb700233t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Hipolito CJ; Suga H Ribosomal Production and in Vitro Selection of Natural Product-like Peptidomimetics: The FIT and RaPID Systems. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2012, 16 (1–2), 196–203. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Kale SS; Villequey C; Kong X-D; Zorzi A; Deyle K; Heinis C Cyclization of Peptides with Two Chemical Bridges Affords Large Scaffold Diversities. Nat Chem 2018, 10 (7), 715–723. 10.1038/s41557-018-0042-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Chen S; Bertoldo D; Angelini A; Pojer F; Heinis C Peptide Ligands Stabilized by Small Molecules. Angewandte Chemie Int Ed 2014, 53 (6), 1602–1606. 10.1002/anie.201309459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Oppewal TR; Jansen ID; Hekelaar J; Mayer C A Strategy to Select Macrocyclic Peptides Featuring Asymmetric Molecular Scaffolds as Cyclization Units by Phage Display. J Am Chem Soc 2022, 144 (8), 3644–3652. 10.1021/jacs.1c12822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Vinogradov AA; Shimomura M; Goto Y; Ozaki T; Asamizu S; Sugai Y; Suga H; Onaka H Minimal Lactazole Scaffold for in Vitro Thiopeptide Bioengineering. Nat Commun 2020, 11 (1), 2272. 10.1038/s41467-020-16145-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Yu Y; Mukherjee S; Donk WA van der. Product Formation by the Promiscuous Lanthipeptide Synthetase ProcM Is under Kinetic Control. J Am Chem Soc 2015, 137 (15), 5140–5148. 10.1021/jacs.5b01409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Mogilevsky CS; Lobba MJ; Brauer DD; Marmelstein AM; Maza JC; Gleason JM; Doudna JA; Francis MB Synthesis of Multi-Protein Complexes through Charge-Directed Sequential Activation of Tyrosine Residues. J Am Chem Soc 2021, 143 (34), 13538–13547. 10.1021/jacs.1c03079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Seo S-Y; Sharma VK; Sharma N Mushroom Tyrosinase: Recent Prospects. J Agr Food Chem 2003, 51 (10), 2837–2853. 10.1021/jf020826f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Ramsden CA; Riley PA Tyrosinase: The Four Oxidation States of the Active Site and Their Relevance to Enzymatic Activation, Oxidation and Inactivation. Bioorgan Med Chem 2014, 22 (8), 2388–2395. 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.02.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Ito S; Wakamatsu K Chemistry of Mixed Melanogenesis—Pivotal Roles of Dopaquinone†. Photochem Photobiol 2008, 84 (3), 582–592. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2007.00238.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Ito S; Prota G A Facile One-Step Synthesis of Cysteinyldopas Using Mushroom Tyrosinase. Experientia 1977, 33 (8), 1118–1119. 10.1007/bf01946005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Lobba MJ; Fellmann C; Marmelstein AM; Maza JC; Kissman EN; Robinson SA; Staahl BT; Urnes C; Lew RJ; Mogilevsky CS; Doudna JA; Francis MB Site-Specific Bioconjugation through Enzyme-Catalyzed Tyrosine–Cysteine Bond Formation. Acs Central Sci 2020, 6 (9), 1564–1571. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Shuster V; Fishman A Isolation, Cloning and Characterization of a Tyrosinase with Improved Activity in Organic Solvents from Bacillus Megaterium. J Mol Microb Biotech 2009, 17 (4), 188–200. 10.1159/000233506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Gao Y; Mutter-Rottmayer E; Greenwalt AM; Goldfarb D; Yan F; Yang Y; Martinez-Chacin RC; Pearce KH; Tateishi S; Major MB; Vaziri C A Neomorphic Cancer Cell-Specific Role of MAGE-A4 in Trans-Lesion Synthesis. Nat Commun 2016, 7 (1), 12105. 10.1038/ncomms12105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Hartman MCT Non‐canonical Amino Acid Substrates of E. Coli Aminoacyl‐tRNA Synthetases. Chembiochem 2022, 23 (1), e202100299. 10.1002/cbic.202100299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Maddaluno JF; Faull KF Inhibition of Mushroom Tyrosinase by 3-Amino-L-Tyrosines: Molecular Probing of the Active Site of the Enzyme. Experientia 1988, 44 (10), 885–887. 10.1007/bf01941189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Li A; Acevedo‐Rocha CG; Sun Z; Cox T; Xu JL; Reetz MT Beating Bias in the Directed Evolution of Proteins: Combining High‐Fidelity On‐Chip Solid‐Phase Gene Synthesis with Efficient Gene Assembly for Combinatorial Library Construction. Chembiochem 2018, 19 (3), 221–228. 10.1002/cbic.201700540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Alejaldre L; Pelletier JN; Quaglia D Methods for Enzyme Library Creation: Which One Will You Choose? Bioessays 2021, 43 (8), 2100052. 10.1002/bies.202100052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Murakami H; Ohta A; Ashigai H; Suga H A Highly Flexible TRNA Acylation Method for Non-Natural Polypeptide Synthesis. Nat Methods 2006, 3 (5), 357–359. 10.1038/nmeth877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Fleming SR; Himes PM; Ghodge SV; Goto Y; Suga H; Bowers AA Exploring the Post-Translational Enzymology of PaaA by MRNA Display. J Am Chem Soc 2020, 142 (11), 5024–5028. 10.1021/jacs.0c01576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Rogers JM; Passioura T; Suga H Nonproteinogenic Deep Mutational Scanning of Linear and Cyclic Peptides. Proc National Acad Sci 2018, 115 (43), 201809901. 10.1073/pnas.1809901115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Vinogradov AA; Nagai E; Chang JS; Narumi K; Onaka H; Goto Y; Suga H Accurate Broadcasting of Substrate Fitness for Lactazole Biosynthetic Pathway from Reactivity-Profiling MRNA Display. J Am Chem Soc 2020, 142 (48), 20329–20334. 10.1021/jacs.0c10374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Do H; Kang E; Yang B; Cha HJ; Choi YS A Tyrosinase, MTyr-CNK, That Is Functionally Available as a Monophenol Monooxygenase. Sci Rep-uk 2017, 7 (1), 17267. 10.1038/s41598-017-17635-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
