Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 4;226(4):729–737. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac104

Table 1.

Comparison of Sequence Data Quality Obtained From Isolates and High-Quality Enriched Specimens

Genome cgMLST Count SNP Calling Accuracy, %a Contig Count N50b Mean Coverage
CSF (n = 180) Isolates (n = 109) CSF (n = 180) Isolates (n = 109) CSF (n = 180) Isolates (n = 109) CSF (n = 180) Isolates (n = 109) CSF (n = 180) Isolates (n = 109) CSF (n = 180) Isolates (n = 109)
Minimum 1.94 × 106 2.09 × 106 1405 1562 95.6 98.8 63 94 7781 37 341 16 24
Maximum 2.55 × 106 2.14 × 106 1580 1581 99.2 99.% 718 165 78 704 68 913 364 127
Mean 2.11 × 106 2.11 × 106 1534 1569 98.2 98.9 215 132 35 413 52 558 222 53
± SD ± 90 327 ± 10 894 ± 44 ± 3 ± 0.9 ± 0.06 ± 119 ± 16 ± 12 759 ± 6724 ± 81 ± 26

Abbreviations: cgMLST, core genome multilocus sequencing type; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

a

Calling accuracy was assessed using the correlation between accuracy of allele calling for cgMLST loci and the number of loci present [13].

b

N50 is the shortest contig length that needs to be included for covering 50% of the genome.