Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 30;15:1376777. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1376777

Table 2.

Comparison of the cellular fatty acid composition.

Fatty acid 1 2 3 4a 5b
Saturated
C 16:0 3.7 3.6 12.2 1.8 1.0
C17:0 1.7 2.2 tr 0.2
C 18:0 12.2 12.4 3.9 3.9 1.7
iso-C10:0 tr 1.4 0.1
C19:0 cyclo ω8c 2.1 2.4 11.5 2.4
C19:0 10-methyl 1.1 2.2
Unsaturated
C18:1 ω7c 11-methyl 4.5 4.9 tr 10.7 0.3
C18:1 ω9c 1.1 tr
Hydroxyl
C10:0 3-OH 2.4 2.1 3.2 3.1 5.1
C18:0 3-OH 4.4 2.8 tr 7.1
C10:0 3-OH iso 1.0
Summed features
SF2 1.0 1.1 1.1 tr 0.2
SF3 tr tr 4.4 tr 0.5
SF8 62.7 63.3 65.8 59.3 84.4

1, strain FR2A1T; 2, strain MT2-5-38; 3, Phaeovulum vinaykumarii JA123T; 4, D. denitrificans D9-3T; 5, T. pacifica TL 2T, –, not detected; tr, trace (<1%).

Data were taken from aLiu L. et al. (2023) and bLiu et al. (2017a).Summed features are groups of two or three fatty acids that cannot be separated by GLC using the MIDI system. Summed feature 2 comprised C12:0 aldehyde and unknown 10.9283, summed feature 3 comprised C16:1ω7c and C16:1ω6c, and summed feature 8 comprised C18:1 ω7c and/or C18:1 ω6c. The major fatty acids (>10%) are maked bold.