Skip to main content
. 2024 May 13;10:23779608241250207. doi: 10.1177/23779608241250207

Table 5.

RCC Team Factor Results.

Previous researcha RCC internal reliability at team level α=.98 Current study
Weighted Median (IQR) Weighted Mean (SD) Mdn (IQR) Mean (SD) Unsure n (%)
3 (1–6) 4.2 (2.2) 1. My team has adequate resources to support staff research training 3 (1–5) 3.5 (2.3) 11 (3.8)
2 (1–4) 3.7 (2.0) 2. My team has funds/equipment/admin to support research activities 2 (1–4) 2.9 (2.0) 13 (4.4)
3(1–5) 4.3 (2.2) 3. My team participates in team level planning for research development 2 (1–5) 3.0 (2.2) 15 (5.1)
3 (1–5) 4.7 (2.3) 4. My team ensures staff involvement in developing that plan 3 (1–5) 3.3 (2.4) 15 (5.1)
5 (2–7) 6.2 (2.5) 5. My team has team leaders that support research 4 (2–7) 4.6 (2.9) 12 (4.1)
4 (2–6) 5.3 (2.4) 6. My team provides opportunities to get involved in research 3 (1–5) 3.6 (2.6) 13 (4.4)
5 (3–7) 5.9 (2.4) 7. My team undertakes planning that is guided by evidence 4 (2–6) 4.2 (2.6) 13 (4.4)
3 (1–5) 4.4 (2.3) 8. My team has consumer involvement in research activities/planning 2 (1–5) 3.0 (2.2) 16 (5.5)
2 (1–6) 4.6 (2.5) 9. My team has applied for external funding for research 1 (1–3) 2.5 (2.4) 13 (4.4)
5 (2–7) 5.6 (2.6) 10. My team conducts research activities relevant to practice 3 (1–6) 3.9 (2.9) 17 (5.8)
4 (1.75–7) 5.5 (2.4) 11. My team supports applications for research scholarships/ degrees 2 (1–5) 3.3 (2.8) 19 (6.5)
3 (1–5) 4.5 (2.2) 12. My team has mechanisms to monitor research quality 2 (1–5) 3.1 (2.5) 18 (6.1)
4 (1–7) 5.2 (2.5) 13. My team has identified experts accessible for research advice 2 (1–6) 3.4 (2.7) 18 (6.1)
5 (1–7) 5.3 (2.4) 14. My team disseminates research results at research forums/seminars 3 (1–5) 3.6 (2.8) 16 (5.5)
5 (2–7) 5.9 (2.4) 15. My team supports a multi-disciplinary approach to research 4 (2–7) 4.4 (2.8) 23 (7.8)
3 (1–5) 4.2 (2.3) 16. My team has incentives & support for mentoring activities 2 (1–5) 2.9 (2.3) 21 (7.2)
3 (1–7) 5.0 (2.5) 17. My team has external partners (e.g., universities) engaged in research 3 (1–6) 3.6 (2.8) 18 (6.1)
5 (2–7) 5.2 (2.5) 18. My team supports peer-reviewed publication of research 3 (1–6) 4.0 (2.7) 26 (8.9)
2 (1–5) 3.8 (2.4) 19. My team has software available to support research activities 2 (1–4) 2.7 (2.4) 21 (7.2)
3 (1–6) 4.8 (2.7)  Team factor per item 2.5 (1–5) 3.5 (2.1)

Note. Weighted mean item scores based on studies where individual item mean scores reported (mean n = 1438 per item); weighted medians based on mean n = 6077 responses per item; weighted mean total score based on n = 1636 responses.

a

Weighted means and medians derived from previous studies (see Table 1).