Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 28;5(4):522–528. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000404

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate regression models for predicting rate of percent growth in total kidney volume per yeara

Regression Models and Variables Estimate SEM P Value Partial Correlation Coefficient
Univariate analysis
 eGFR change from baseline to week 3, ml/min per 1.73 m2 0.0000 0.0002 0.8767
 Sex (reference=female) 0.0314 0.0038 <0.0001
 Age, yr −0.0016 0.0003 <0.0001
 eGFR at baseline, ml/min per 1.73 m2 −0.0001 0.0001 0.4393
 SBP at baseline, mm Hg 0.0003 0.0001 0.0739
 BMI at baseline, kg/m2 0.0024 0.0004 <0.0001
 TKV at baseline, ml 0.0000 0.0000 <0.0001
 BUN at baseline, mg/dl 0.0005 0.0004 0.1875
 Fasting uOsm at baseline, mOsm/kg −0.0000 0.0000 0.3745
Multivariate analysis
 eGFR change from baseline at week 3, ml/min per 1.73 m2 −0.0002 0.0003 0.3784 −0.0366
 Sex (male=1, female=2) 0.0203 0.0047 <0.0001 0.1756
 Age, yr −0.0023 0.0004 <0.0001 −0.2554
 eGFR at baseline, ml/min per 1.73 m2 −0.0002 0.0002 0.1683 −0.0572
 SBP at baseline, mm Hg −0.0000 0.0002 0.9546 −0.0024
 BMI at baseline, kg/m2 0.0020 0.0005 <0.0001 0.1787
 TKV at baseline, ml 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.1503
 BUN at baseline, mg/dl −0.0006 0.0005 0.2075 −0.0523
 Fasting uOsm at baseline, mOsm/kg −0.0000 0.0000 0.2952 −0.0435

BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic BP; TKV, total kidney volume; uOsm, urine osmolality.

a

Total kidney volume rate of percent growth calculated for each subject using total kidney volume values measured from baseline up to month 36.