Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Feb 8;57(5):1181–1191. doi: 10.1002/eat.24162

Table 2.

Direct and indirect associations between emotion regulation strategy use, affect, and binge eating

Parameter Unstandardized Probit Estimate SE Bootstrapped 95% Confidence Interval
Direct associations between predictors at T-1 and BE at T-1
T-1 NA → T-1 BE .012 .004 .004, .019
 T-1 PA → T-1 BE −.002 .003 −.008, .005
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T-1 BE .000 .025 −.050, .048
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T-1 BE .059 .026 .007, .110
Direct associations between predictors at T-1 and BE at T
 T-1 NA → T BE −.010 .006 −.022, .002
 T-1 PA → T BE .004 .006 −.008, .016
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T BE −.006 .048 −.106, .088
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T BE −.017 .042 −.095, .069
 T-1 BE → T BE 1.091 .115 .887, 1.345
Direct associations between predictors at T and BE at T, after accounting for the effects of predictors at T-1
 T NA → T BE .016 .005 .005, .026
 T PA → T BE −.003 .005 −.013, .007
 T Adaptive ER → T BE .007 .035 −.062, .072
 T Maladaptive ER → T BE .075 .038 .002, .146
Direct associations between ER at T-1 and affect at T
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T NA .155 .078 .009, .313
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T NA .462 .065 .337, .595
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T PA .445 .093 .274, .638
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T PA .122 .079 −.038, .277
Indirect associations between ER at T-1 and BE at T
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T NA → T BE .002 .000, .006
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T PA → T BE −.001 −.006, .003
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T-1 BE → T BE .000 −.052, .054
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T NA → T BE .007 .002, .013
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T PA → T BE .000 −.002, .001
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T-1 BE → T BE .064 .006, .123

Note. T = current day; T-1 = prior day; NA = negative affect; PA = positive affect; ER = emotion regulation strategy use; BE = binge eating; SE = standard error. Significant parameters are bolded.