Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Feb 8;57(5):1181–1191. doi: 10.1002/eat.24162

Table 3.

Direct and indirect associations between emotion regulation strategy use, affect, and purging

Parameter Unstandardized Probit Estimate SE Bootstrapped 95% Confidence Interval
Direct associations between predictors at T-1 and purging at T-1
 T-1 NA → T-1 Purge .015 .008 .000, .031
 T-1 PA → T-1 Purge −.001 .006 −.014, .011
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T-1 Purge .011 .060 −.085, .148
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T-1 Purge .085 .054 −.012, .204
Direct associations between predictors at T-1 and purging at T
 T-1 NA → T Purge −.009 .014 −.039, .015
 T-1 PA → T Purge −.005 .013 −.030, .022
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T Purge −.152 .085 −.327, .007
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T Purge −.129 .109 −.376, .049
 T-1 Purge → T Purge .988 .123 .726, 1.204
Direct associations between predictors at T and purging at T, after accounting for the effects of predictors at T-1
 T NA → T Purge .024 .010 .004, .044
 T PA → T Purge −.001 .009 −.019, .017
 T Adaptive ER → T Purge .061 .084 −.081, .245
 T Maladaptive ER → T Purge .115 .071 −.016, .261
Direct associations between ER at T-1 and affect at T
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T NA .155 .078 .008, .314
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T NA .461 .065 .335, .594
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T PA .445 .093 .274, .638
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T PA .122 .078 −.036, .278
Indirect associations between ER at T-1 and purging at T
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T NA → T Purge .004 .000, .009
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T PA → T Purge .000 −.008, .008
 T-1 Adaptive ER → T-1 Purge → T Purge .011 −.087, .134
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T NA → T Purge .011 .002, .020
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T PA → T Purge .000 −.003, .002
 T-1 Maladaptive ER → T-1 Purge → T Purge .084 −.012, .180

Note. T = current day; T-1 = prior day; NA = negative affect; PA = positive affect; ER = emotion regulation strategy use; SE = standard error. Significant parameters are bolded.