Table 4.

Direct and indirect associations between emotion regulation strategy use, affect, and dieting

Parameter	Unstandardized Probit Estimate	SE	Bootstrapped 95% Confidence Interval
Direct associations between predictors at T-1 and dieting at T-1
T-1 NA → T-1 Diet	.002	.002	−.001, .006
T-1 PA → T-1 Diet	.005	.002	.001, .009
T-1 Adaptive ER → T-1 Diet	.000	.015	−.029, .028
T-1 Maladaptive ER → T-1 Diet	.011	.014	−.018, .037
Direct associations between predictors at T-1 and dieting at T
T-1 NA → T Diet	−.007	.009	−.024, .010
T-1 PA → T Diet	−.021	.007	−.034, −.007
T-1 Adaptive ER → T Diet	−.023	.064	−.157, .096
T-1 Maladaptive ER → T Diet	−.040	.058	−.153, .081
T-1 Diet → T Diet	4.777	.383	4.108, 5.629
Direct associations between predictors at T and dieting at T, after accounting for the effects of predictors at T-1
T NA → T Diet	.009	.008	−.007, .025
T PA → T Diet	.022	.007	.009, .036
T Adaptive ER → T Diet	.006	.061	−.114, .130
T Maladaptive ER → T Diet	.055	.056	−.060, .165
Direct associations between ER at T-1 and affect at T
T-1 Adaptive ER → T NA	.155	.078	.009, .314
T-1 Maladaptive ER → T NA	.462	.065	.337, .595
T-1 Adaptive ER → T PA	.445	.093	.273, .639
T-1 Maladaptive ER → T PA	.122	.079	−.038, .277
Indirect associations between ER at T-1 and dieting at T
T-1 Adaptive ER → T NA → T Diet	.001	—	−.001, .005
T-1 Adaptive ER → T PA → T Diet	.010	—	.004, .019
T-1 Adaptive ER → T-1 Diet → T Diet	−.001	—	−.140, .138
T-1 Maladaptive ER → T NA → T Diet	.004	—	−.003, .012
T-1 Maladaptive ER → T PA → T Diet	.003	—	−.001, .007
T-1 Maladaptive ER → T-1 Diet → T Diet	.051	—	−.086, .180

Note. T = current day; T-1 = prior day; NA = negative affect; PA = positive affect; ER = emotion regulation strategy use; SE = standard error. Significant parameters are bolded.