Table 4.
RE-AIM domains | Data charted | Cancer screening type | ||
|
|
Colorectal cancer | Breast cancer | Cervical cancer |
Reach | Was the number of targeted staff or patients for HIT-based intervention reported | Higha | High | High |
Effectiveness | Did the HIT tools show positive results in the cancer screening intervention | High | Moderate | High |
Adoption | Rate of HIT adoption | Low | Moderate | Low |
Implementation | Barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies used related to HIT | Moderate | Low | Low |
Maintenance | Was the sustainment of HIT adoption measured | Low | Low | Low |
aLow: <25% of the included studies for each cancer screening type category, moderate: 25% to 50% of the included studies for each cancer screening type category, and high: >50% of the included studies for each cancer screening type category. Percentages were calculated with respect to the included studies for each cancer screening type category.