Table 7.

Analysis of the association between dietary pattern and WHR in male

Dietary pattern	Total n (%)		p	Model 1 n (%)	p	Model 1 n (%)
	Non-obese	Obese		PR (95%CI)		PR (95%CI)
Pattern 1
Q1	85(65.9)	44(34.1)	0.305	1		1
Q2	93(75.0)	31(25.0)		0.712(0.481, 1.053)	0.182	0.803(0.549, 1.174)	0.257
Q3	91(67.4)	44(32.6)		0.945(0.665, 1.343)	0.753	1.092(0.776, 1.536)	0.615
Q4	124(72.9)	46(27.1)		0.787(0.553, 1.119)	0.182	0.955(0.680, 1.340)	0.789
Pattern 2
Q1	95(75.4)	31(24.6)	0.254	1
Q2	107(70.4)	45(29.6)		1.153(0.778, 1.709)	0.118	1.225(0.843, 1.781)	0.853
Q3	96(72.2)	37(27.8)		1.089(0.724, 1.637)	0.683	1.026(0.689, 1.526)	0.901
Q4	95(64.6)	52(35.4)		1.358(0.925, 1.993)	0.447	1.225(0.842, 1.781)	0.289
Pattern 3
Q1	103(67.8)	49(32.2)	0.746	1		1
Q2	105(73.4)	38(26.6)		0.888(0.626, 1.259)	0.503	0.947(0.669, 1.341)	0.413
Q3	84(69.4)	37(30.6)		0.902(0.628, 1.295)	0.576	0.010(0.713, 1.432)	0.766
Q4	101(71.1)	41(28.9)		0.847(0.595, 1.207)	0.359	1.029(0.731, 1.449)	0.466
Pattern 4
Q1	96(74.4)	33(25.6)	0.105	1		1
Q2	105(75.5)	34(25.4)		0.886(0.580, 1.355)	0.578	0.855(0.562, 1.302)	0.466
Q3	107(68.6)	49(31.4)		1.142(0.779, 1.674)	0.498	1.057(0.732, 1.527)	0.766
Q4	85(63.4)	49(36.6)		1.376(0.949, 1.993)	0.092	1.164(0.809, 1.675)	0.413

The chi-square trend test and robust Poisson regression analysis were used for analysis. Q1 was the reference group

Model 1 is unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age, monthly income, how many kids and educational level. The bold p-value means “ < 0.05”