Table 8.

Analysis of the association between dietary pattern and WHR in female

Dietary pattern	Total n (%)		p	Model 1 n (%)	p	Model 2 n (%)	p
	Non-obese	Obese		PR (95%CI)		PR (95%CI)
Pattern 1
Q1	82(67.8)	39(32.2)	0.853	1		1
Q2	80(63.0)	47(37.0)		1.349(0.959, 1.897)	0.777	1.574(1.103, 2.246)	0.210
Q3	78(66.7)	39(33.3)		1.100(0.771, 1.570)	0.598	1.289(0.899, 1.849)	0.167
Q4	54(67.5)	26(32.5)		1.062(0.699, 1.614)	0.085	1.248(0.805, 1.934)	0.344
Pattern 2
Q1	96(76.8)	29(23.2)	0.007	1		1
Q2	61(62.2)	37(37.8)		1.672(1.117, 2.502)	0.103	1.747(1.187, 2.571)	0.210
Q3	79(66.9)	39(33.1)		1.429(0.952, 2.143)	0.305	1.383(0.929, 2.060)	0.110
Q4	58(55.8)	46(44.2)		1.849(1.256, 2.721)	0.020	1.658(1.118, 2.460)	0.005
Pattern 3
Q1	67(67.7)	32(32.3)	0.231	1		1
Q2	62(57.9)	45(42.1)		1.251(0.878, 1.783)	0.819	1.263(0.889, 1.795)	0.192
Q3	90(68.2)	42(31.8)		0.912(0.623, 1.335)	0.634	0.950(0.648, 1.393)	0.794
Q4	75(70.1)	32(29.9)		0.955(0.45, 1.415)	0.819	1.027(0.693, 1.521)	0.896
Pattern 4
Q1	88(72.7)	33(27.3)	0.303	1		1
Q2	74(66.1)	38(33.9)		1.162(0.789, 1.711)	0.967	1.094(0.746, 1.504)	0.646
Q3	49(51.0)	47(49.0)		1.720(1.204, 2.458)	0.300	1.566(1.094, 2.243)	0.014
Q4	83(71.6)	33(28.4)		1.009(0.675, 1.507)	0.967	0.886(0.588, 1.337)	0.565

The chi-square trend test and robust Poisson regression analysis were used for analysis. Q1 was the reference group

Model 1 is unadjusted