Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 19;30(2):195–201. doi: 10.1177/15910199221128439

Table 4.

Influence of expert status and age on HRV metrics.

EXPERT AGE
model significance (p) T p T p
HRV METRICS
Time Domain
Mean RR <0.001** −4.36 <0.001** 6,12 <0.001**
Median RR <0.001** −4.22 <0.001** 5.80 <0.001**
Mean HR <0.001** 3.34 0.001* −5.21 <0.001**
SDNN 0.733 −0.47 0.638 0,76 0.447
RMSSD 0.093 −1.85 0.067 0.71 0.480
NN50 0.027* −1.79 0.076 0.12 0.904
pNN50 0.020* −2.56 0.012* 1.24 0.218
Frequency Domain
VLF % 0.021* 1.38 0.172 0.46 0.649
LF % 0.400 −0.41 0.683 −0.48 0.630
HF % <0.001** −3.41 0.001* 0.07 0.944
LF/HF <0.001** 2.83 0.006* −0.03 0.978
LF n.u. 0.005* 2.67 0.009* −0.81 0.418
HF n.u. 0.005* −2.67 0.009* 0.81 0.418
VLF abs. 0.289 0.02 0.987 0.97 0.334
LF abs. 0.699 −0.60 0.548 0.10 0.918
HF abs. 0.062 −1.20 0.734 −0.35 0.729

Table 4 presents the influence and significance of linear multivariate regression analysis comparing the influence of expert status and age on HRV metrics. Abbreviations: Expert, comparison between experts and beginners; T, regression coefficient of the respective t-tests; p. significance; *, p < 0.005, **, p < 0.001; SD, standard deviation; HRV, heart rate variability; RR, distance between two subsequent R peaks, SDNN, Standard deviation of normal-to-normal RR- intervals; RMSSD, Square root of the mean squared differences between successive RR-intervals; NN50, Number of successive RR-interval pairs that differ more than 50 ms; pNN50, NN50 divided by the total number of RR-intervals; VLF, Very low frequency (0–0.04 Hz); LF, Low frequency (0.04–0.15 Hz); HF, High frequency (0.15–0.4 Hz), VLF, LF and HF powers [%],Relative powers of VLF, LF and HF bands; LF/HF, ratio between HF and LF band power; LF and HF [n.u.], Powers of LF and HF bands in normalized units; VLF, LF, and HF abs., absolute powers of VLF, LF, and HF bands