TABLE 1.
Full sample | CN (N = 147) | AD (N = 141) | bvFTD (N = 44) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
test | |||||
Sex (M/F) | 53/94 | 66/75 | 35/9 | AD vs. CN | bvFTD vs. CN |
= 7.07, P = 0.008 | = 17.01, P < 0.0001 | ||||
Student t test | |||||
Age (years) | 67 ± 8.3 | 74 ± 6.2 | 69.5 ± 8.0 | AD vs. CN | bvFTD vs. CN |
t = 7.56, P < 0.0001 | t = 1.87, P = 0.0630 | ||||
Student t test | |||||
Education (years) | 13.2 ± 4.5 | 10.2 ± 4.9 | 13.1 ± 5.3 | AD vs. CN | bvFTD vs. CN |
t = −5.66, P < 0.001 | t = −0.73, P = 0.4688 |
Sample 1 | CN (N = 45) | AD (N = 31) | bvFTD (N = 18) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
test | |||||
Sex (M/F) | 17/29 | 14/17 | 13/5 | AD vs. CN | bvFTD vs. CN |
= 0, P = 1 | = 10.74, P = 0.001 | ||||
Student t test | |||||
Age (years) | 71 ± 7.2 | 76 ± 7.5 | 68 ± 9.9 | AD vs. CN | bvFTD vs. CN |
t = 2.70, P = 0.008 | t = −1.25, P = 0.22 | ||||
Student t test | |||||
Education (years) | 14.7 ± 4 | 9.9 ± 4.9 | 15.4 ± 4.8 | AD vs. CN | bvFTD vs. CN |
t = −4.63, P < 0.001 | t = 0.57, P = 0.57 |
Sample 2 | CN (N = 101) | AD (N = 110) | bvFTD (N = 26) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
test | |||||
Sex (M/F) | 36/65 | 53/58 | 26/10 | AD vs. CN | bvFTD vs. CN |
= 7.09, P = 0.008 | = 7.09, P < 0.0048 | ||||
Student t test | |||||
Age (years) | 65.6 ± 8.2 | 73.3 ± 5.7 | 70.4 ± 6.3 | AD vs. CN | bvFTD vs. CN |
t = 8.09, P < 0.0001 | t = 2.98, P = 0.0034 | ||||
Student t test | |||||
Education (years) | 12.6 ± 4.5 | 10.3 ± 4.9 | 11.7 ± 5.0 | AD vs. CN | bvFTD vs. CN |
t = −3.74, P = 0.0002 | t = −1.34, P = 0.1826 |
Notes: Values constituted by proportion (sex) and mean ± standard deviation (age and education). Categorical variables were analyzed with Pearson chi‐squared () test. Continuous variables were analyzed through Student t tests.
Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer's disease; bvFTD, behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia; CN, healthy controls.