Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 25;13(2):169–180. doi: 10.1159/000531744

Table 1.

Ranking of the first-line systemic treatments for advanced HCC according to their probability of being the best in OS and PFS

Fifteen-month OS Thirty-month OS Six-month PFS
treatment SUCRA treatment SUCRA treatment SUCRA
Sintilimab + IBI305 0.946 Atezolizumab + bevacizumab 0.883 Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib 0.926
Atezolizumab + bevacizumab 0.843 Camrelizumab + apatinib 0.865 Lenvatinib 0.858
Camrelizumab + apatinib 0.804 Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib 0.722 Camrelizumab + apatinib 0.786
Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib 0.586 Durvalumab + tremelimumab 0.626 Sintilimab + IBI305 0.712
Lenvatinib 0.553 Nivolumab 0.506 Atezolizumab + cabozantinib 0.695
Atezolizumab + cabozantinib 0.467 Lenvatinib 0.466 Atezolizumab + bevacizumab 0.518
Durvalumab + tremelimumab 0.410 Tislelizumab 0.352 Sorafenib 0.347
Nivolumab 0.319 Durvalumab 0.342 Durvalumab + tremelimumab 0.324
Durvalumab 0.264 Atezolizumab + cabozantinib 0.120 Nivolumab 0.153
Tislelizumab 0.195 Sorafenib 0.114 Durvalumab 0.107
Sorafenib 0.111 Tislelizumab 0.070

SUCRA, Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking.