Table 1.
Ranking of the first-line systemic treatments for advanced HCC according to their probability of being the best in OS and PFS
Fifteen-month OS | Thirty-month OS | Six-month PFS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
treatment | SUCRA | treatment | SUCRA | treatment | SUCRA |
Sintilimab + IBI305 | 0.946 | Atezolizumab + bevacizumab | 0.883 | Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib | 0.926 |
Atezolizumab + bevacizumab | 0.843 | Camrelizumab + apatinib | 0.865 | Lenvatinib | 0.858 |
Camrelizumab + apatinib | 0.804 | Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib | 0.722 | Camrelizumab + apatinib | 0.786 |
Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib | 0.586 | Durvalumab + tremelimumab | 0.626 | Sintilimab + IBI305 | 0.712 |
Lenvatinib | 0.553 | Nivolumab | 0.506 | Atezolizumab + cabozantinib | 0.695 |
Atezolizumab + cabozantinib | 0.467 | Lenvatinib | 0.466 | Atezolizumab + bevacizumab | 0.518 |
Durvalumab + tremelimumab | 0.410 | Tislelizumab | 0.352 | Sorafenib | 0.347 |
Nivolumab | 0.319 | Durvalumab | 0.342 | Durvalumab + tremelimumab | 0.324 |
Durvalumab | 0.264 | Atezolizumab + cabozantinib | 0.120 | Nivolumab | 0.153 |
Tislelizumab | 0.195 | Sorafenib | 0.114 | Durvalumab | 0.107 |
Sorafenib | 0.111 | – | – | Tislelizumab | 0.070 |
SUCRA, Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking.