Table 3.
Cluster ID | Size | Silhouette | Mean (Year) | Label (LLR) | Label (MI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 23 | 0.911 | 2017 | Motor aphasia | Prolonged flaccid paralysis |
1 | 23 | 0.965 | 2014 | Ischemic stroke | Prolonged flaccid paralysis |
2 | 19 | 0.849 | 2021 | Signaling pathway activation | Prolonged flaccid paralysis |
3 | 18 | 0.971 | 2018 | Convalescent-period ischemic stroke patient | Prolonged flaccid paralysis |
4 | 17 | 0.869 | 2016 | Tiaoshen kaiqiao acupuncture | Prolonged flaccid paralysis |
15 | 6 | 0.992 | 2018 | Treating ischemic stroke | Motor aphasia |
17 | 5 | 0.979 | 2014 | Acupuncture intervention | Motor aphasia |
The cluster analysis results mainly include cluster ID, mean year, size, silhouette, label (LLR), and label (MI). Cluster ID is the number after clustering, and Size represents the number of members contained in the cluster. The larger the size is, the smaller the number. Mean Year represents the average year of the literature in the cluster, which can be used to judge the distance of the cited literature in the cluster. The larger the log-likelihood ratio (LLR) is, the more representative the cluster category; mutual information (MI) is mainly used to represent the relationship between terms and categories in text mining, and it does not consider the frequency of feature words.