Table 7.
Cluster ID | Size | Silhouette | Mean (Year) | Label (LLR) | Label (MI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 18 | 0.938 | 2015 | Inhibiting nf-kappa-b-mediated activation | Local anesthesia |
1 | 16 | 0.798 | 2008 | Mcp-induced protein | Local anesthesia |
2 | 15 | 0.855 | 2012 | Cerebral infarction | Local anesthesia |
3 | 14 | 0.834 | 2014 | Reporting quality | Local anesthesia |
4 | 14 | 0.872 | 2012 | Memory deficit | Local anesthesia |
5 | 14 | 0.889 | 2013 | Chinese herbal formula | Acupuncture therapy |
6 | 14 | 0.712 | 2012 | Chronic stage | Brain disease |
7 | 13 | 0.934 | 2018 | Treg balance | Local anesthesia |
8 | 10 | 0.844 | 2015 | Non-pharmacological treatment | Unblocked collateral |
9 | 8 | 0.813 | 2011 | Cerebral oedema | Unblocked collateral |
10 | 6 | 0.974 | 2017 | Xingnao Kaiqiao | Unblocked collateral |
The cluster analysis results mainly include Cluster ID, mean year, size, silhouette, label (LLR), and label (MI). Cluster ID is the number after clustering, and Size represents the number of members contained in the cluster. The larger the size is, the smaller the number. Mean Year represents the average year of the literature in the cluster, which can be used to judge the distance of the cited literature in the cluster. The larger the log-likelihood ratio (LLR) is, the more representative the cluster category; mutual information (MI) is mainly used to represent the relationship between terms and categories in text mining, and it does not consider the frequency of feature words.