Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 9;5(2):59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.12.004

Table 2.

Confusion matrices comparing the deep learning model–predicted atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease score vs pooled cohort equation–calculated scores

UK BioBank
EyePACS 10K
EyePACS 10K + diabetes modifier
PCE-generated ASCVD score <7.5% PCE-generated ASCVD score ≥7.5% PCE-generated ASCVD score <7.5% PCE-generated ASCVD score ≥7.5% PCE-generated ASCVD score <7.5% PCE-generated ASCVD score ≥7.5%
DL model–generated ASCVD score <7.5% 5923 (69%) 331 (4%) 4126 (46%) 2238 (25%) 3015 (34%) 279 (3%)
DL model–generated ASCVD score ≥7.5% 642 (7%) 1710 (20%) 217 (2%) 2388 (27%) 1328 (15%) 4347 (48%)

ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; DL = deep learning; PCE = pooled cohort equation.

Results are n (%) of people.