Skip to main content
. 2024 May 6;18:100648. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100648

Table 1.

Research according PICOST structure.

Population Learners training in basic or advanced life support (laypersons/students/healthcare providers).
Intervention Instruction using RCDP.
Comparison Compared to traditional instruction or other forms of learning without RCDP.
Outcomes Patients’ survival (CRITICAL), knowledge acquisition and retention (IMPORTANT), skills acquisition and retention (IMPORTANT), skill performance in real CPR (IMPORTANT), process outcomes such as costs, resources (NOT IMPORTANT).
Study design Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (non-randomized controlled trials, interrupted time series, controlled before-and-after studies, cohort studies) and research letters were eligible for inclusion.
Timeframe All years and all languages were included as long as there was an English abstract; unpublished studies (e.g., conference abstracts, trial protocols) were excluded. Literature search was performed from inception to Feb 12th, 2024.

CPR: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; RCDP: Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice.