Skip to main content
. 2024 May 15;24:541. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05368-4

Table 4.

Kendall’s tau-b correlations between reflection scores (RS) and text lengths in the three modules, N = 114

RS Module 1 RS Module 2 RS Module 3 Text length Module 1 Text length Module 2 Text length Module 3
RS Module 1 Kendall’s tau-b 1 0.369** 0.142* 0.235**
Sig. (2-tailed) < 0.001 0.039 < 0.001
RS Module 2 Kendall’s tau-b 1 0.219** 0.345**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.002 < 0.001
RS Module 3 Kendall’s tau-b 1 0.404**
Sig. (2-tailed) < 0.001
Text length Module 1 Kendall’s tau-b 1 0.414** 0.304**
Sig. (2-tailed) < 0.001 < 0.001
Text length Module 2 Kendall’s tau-b 1 0.443**
Sig. (2-tailed) < 0.001
Text length Module 3 Kendall’s tau-b 1
Sig. (2-tailed)

**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)