Table 4.
Kendall’s tau-b correlations between reflection scores (RS) and text lengths in the three modules, N = 114
| RS Module 1 | RS Module 2 | RS Module 3 | Text length Module 1 | Text length Module 2 | Text length Module 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS Module 1 | Kendall’s tau-b | 1 | 0.369** | 0.142* | 0.235** | ||
| Sig. (2-tailed) | < 0.001 | 0.039 | < 0.001 | ||||
| RS Module 2 | Kendall’s tau-b | 1 | 0.219** | 0.345** | |||
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.002 | < 0.001 | |||||
| RS Module 3 | Kendall’s tau-b | 1 | 0.404** | ||||
| Sig. (2-tailed) | < 0.001 | ||||||
| Text length Module 1 | Kendall’s tau-b | 1 | 0.414** | 0.304** | |||
| Sig. (2-tailed) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |||||
| Text length Module 2 | Kendall’s tau-b | 1 | 0.443** | ||||
| Sig. (2-tailed) | < 0.001 | ||||||
| Text length Module 3 | Kendall’s tau-b | 1 | |||||
| Sig. (2-tailed) | |||||||
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)