Skip to main content
. 2024 May 14;65(5):22. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.5.22

Table 2.

Clinical Characteristics of Each Phenotype Group

Phenotype Group Normal BPD/VMD CACD PSPD RP P Value
No. of cases 13 27 68 98 35
Sex
 Female:male 7:6 17:10 35:35 48:50 18:17 0.751a
Age at imaging
 Mean ± SD 32 ± 17 56 ± 13 53 ± 16 60 ± 12 52 ± 15
< 0.001,
 Median (IQR) 33 (20–40) 56 (48–66) 54 (42–63) 61 (51–70) 52 (38–62)
Asymptomatic count/total (%) 10/13 (77%) 3/27 (11%) 3/58 (5%) 4/77 (5%) 0/34 (0%)
Age of symptom onset
 Mean ± SD 31 ± 34 45 ± 12 41 ± 13 44 ± 14 34 ± 17
0.004,§
 Median (IQR) 20 (13–45) 44 (40–51) 40 (34–50) 40 (35–53) 33 (20–48)
Better eye VA (logMAR)
 Median (IQR) 0 (0–0.1) 0.02 (0–0.1) 0.2 (0–0.7) 0.1 (0–0.3) 0.1 (0–0.2) 0.002,
Electrophysiology
 Normal* 2 2 4 0 0
 Macular dystrophy 0 3 9 9 0
 Cone dystrophy 0 4 7 5 0
 Cone-rod dystrophy 0 0 2 15 0
 Rod-cone dystrophy 0 0 0 15 23
*

Normal full-field and PERG.

a

χ2 test.

One-way ANOVA.

The normal group was significantly lower than all other groups (all P < 0.001). The PSPD group was significantly higher than both the CACD (P = 0.012) and RP (P = 0.017) groups.

§

The RP group was younger than both BPD/VMD (P = 0.048) and PSPD (P = 0.015)

Kruskal–Wallis test.

VA for the BPD/VMD group was significantly lower than the CACD croup (P = 0.035)