Skip to main content
. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0303665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303665

Table 2. Meta-analysis of PLR levels in SLE patients compared to that in controls.

Groups Population No. of studies Test of association Test of heterogeneity
SMD* 95% CI p-value Model p-value I 2
All Overall 15 0.604 0.299–0.909 < 0.001 R < 0.001 93.4
Ethnicity Asian 6 0.520 0.359–0.681 < 0.001 R 0.082 48.7
Arab 6 0.782 0.039–1.525 0.039 R < 0.001 96.9
European 3 0.505 0.344–1.353 0.244 R < 0.001 94.2
Sample size Small (< 200) 9 0.684 0.215–1.153 0.004 R < 0.001 92.8
Large (≥ 200) 6 0.492 0.053–0.932 0.028 R < 0.001 95.0
SLE activity Active vs. Inactive 5 0.553 0.000–1.106 0.050 R < 0.001 87.9
LN LN (+) vs. LN (-) 4 0.356 -0.145–0.858 0.164 R < 0.001 84.8

PLR: Platelet to lymphocyte ratio, SLE: Systemic lupus erythematosus, LN: Lupus nephritis, CI: Confidence interval, F: Fixed effects model, R: Random effects model, NA: Not applicable.

*: Magnitude of Cohen’s d effect size (SMD): 0.2–0.5, small effect; 0.5–0.8, medium effect; ≥ 0.8, large effect.