Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0298580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298580

Barriers to adaptation of environmental sustainability in SMEs: A qualitative study

Nazneen Durrani 1, Abdul Raziq 2, Tarique Mahmood 3,4, Mustafa Rehman Khan 3,5,*
Editor: Agnieszka Konys6
PMCID: PMC11098482  PMID: 38753854

Abstract

This study examines the antecedents of environmental sustainability in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of a developing country and explores the specific internal and external factors for environmental sustainability. The study focused on SMEs in Balochistan, Pakistan, utilizing convenience and purposive sampling techniques to select a sample size of 30 SMEs. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire. The results of the study revealed that lack of finance and education are major barriers to recognizing and addressing environmental sustainability issues, along with the lack of government support and regulations to ensure compliance with environmental safety laws, hence leading to low concern for sustainability practices among SMEs. Awareness and attitude of SME owners/managers, along with customer demand and government policies, influence the adoption of environmental sustainability practices. Overcoming financial constraints and promoting cooperation among stakeholders are key to fostering sustainable practices in SMEs. This research makes an important contribution to the sustainable management literature by providing new and in-depth insights into the barriers that impede environmental sustainability in SMEs of developing countries.

Introduction

Sustainability is now a critical aspect of development, with growing awareness among people in developing countries [1]. Climate change and environmental disasters are major threats to the planet and must be addressed through policies that connect the environment, economy, and society for sustainable growth [2]. To prevent the environment, organizations are striving to adopt sustainable practices and focusing on green practices, processes, and products [3]. This enables firms to bring positive impacts on organizational performance and the environment. However, ambiguity is still high on how firms can contribute to sustainability, especially in context of small and medium enterprises (SMEs).

SMEs have not received significant attention in the ongoing global discussion about sustainable development [4, 5]. It is evident that large organizations impact environment. It is also crucial to acknowledge the pivotal role of SMEs as well. SMEs impact on environment become clearer when we consider their collective impacts. Globally, over 95% of businesses are SMEs [6]. Although each SME may have little impact, the cumulative effect of SMEs can be substantial due to their large number [4]. It is often mentioned that SMEs are responsible for major pollution [7].

Environmental sustainability in SMEs refers to the practice of reducing the environmental impact of business operations while ensuring performance [8]. This can involve reducing waste, conserving resources, using renewable energy sources, and minimizing carbon emissions [8, 9]. However, SMEs face challenges in implementing sustainable practices due to limited resources, lack of access to information, and high initial costs [10]. This challenge becomes more severe in resource-constrained developing countries.

Researchers have been supporting the adaptation of sustainability practices [3, 11]. However, literature has not adequately addressed the sustainability issues faced by SMEs in developing countries as it has with developed ones [12]. This situation has been widely acknowledged in the literature [4, 5]. Wang et al. [10] shed light on the importance of sustainability initiatives in developing countries and the unique barriers and motivational factors. Similarly, Jabbour et al., [4] emphasized the significance of sustainability in developing countries and the need to study strategies for achieving sustainable practices. Additionally, Purwandani & Michaud [13] recognized the necessity to delve into sustainability matters within SMEs as it impacts business performance and presents new market opportunities.

Prior studies showed that organizations should focus on improving economic, environmental, and social sustainability through the triple bottom line approach [3, 14]. Albeit, the dynamics of a resource-constrained country are different, thus requiring a different approach to achieve environmental sustainability. Therefore, there is need to explore the barriers and limitations of a developing country before replicating those strategies that work well in developed countries.

In this study we address the gap by exploring the internal and external factors that contribute to achieve the environmental sustainability in SMEs of Pakistan. The present study recognizes the existence of environmental alerts in Pakistan, particularly in Balochistan that comprise great environmental concern and weak governance [1517]. Hence, this research significantly contributes to the discipline of sustainability. Further, the research framework of this study encompasses environmental orientation, responsible environmental management, and eco-friendly practices, which grounded on strategic competencies such as pollution prevention, product stewardship, and sustainable development of natural resource-based view (NRBV) theory [18, 19]. Therefore, this study provides comprehensive understanding of internal and external dimensions of SMEs that need to be nurtured to improve environmental sustainability. While extending the previous research Baah et al. [18], this research provides new insight for top management, policymakers, governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) for achieving environmental performance in SMEs of developing countries.

Literature review

Factors of environmental sustainability in SMEs

Research suggests that customers may prioritize low prices over environmentally friendly practices [20]. However, some argue that consumers prefer to buy from sustainable companies even if it means paying a slightly higher price [21]. Though research is not conclusive over consumer buying eco-friendly products from SMEs or big firms, however, it shows consumer preference for sustainable products. Since SMEs are a crucial component of the global economy providing a significant portion of GDP in countries [10]. Hence, it can be inferred that their collective impact on the environment is also substantial, contributing to 70% of overall pollution [7]. Environmental sustainability is now a global concern for SMEs and comes under public policy limelight. SMEs may address environmental concerns through waste recycling or pollution prevention [2224]. Therefore, addressing environmental considerations, it is important to consider both materialistic and non-materialistic approaches, such as production processes or long-term sustainability goals. The business community should also be mindful of resource scarcity and strive for a balance between current utilization and future needs, prioritizing long-term thinking over short-term profits.

SMEs prioritize survival and cost reduction that may not align with environmental sustainability [25]. The relationship between environmental sustainability and economic outcomes is complex and influenced by multiple factors. However, engaging in environmentally efficient practices can lead to long-term benefits and increased revenue through recycling, reuse and reduce [26]. Hence, it raised question whether eco-efficiency could increase profits for SMEs [27]. Researchers suggest that adaptation of sustainable practices and ecological partnerships can lead to financial success for SMEs [28]. Moreover, Hossain et al. [29] conducted a systematic literature review of articles published during 2009–2020 and identified 87 drivers of environmental sustainability and categorized them under internal and external dimensions. Researchers suggested that SMEs should focus on internal and external factors for implementation of sustainable practices. Hence, researchers identified internal and external barriers suitable to the context of this study. Table 1 summarizes the barriers and opportunities for SMEs.

Table 1. Barriers and opportunities for SMEs.

Barriers For SMEs Opportunities for SMEs
• Insufficient knowledge among owners/managers or employees.
• Limited workforce size.
• Constrained financial resources.
• Inadequate organizational capacity.
• Restricted and short-term business operations integrated into daily activities.
• Pessimistic belief that engaging in environmental sustainability practices might have a prolonged payback period.
• Non-compliance or lack of adherence to government legislation.
• Concerns about potential temporary cost increases for products, with owners fearing customer resistance to higher prices.
• Different levels of awareness among owners/managers.
• Diverse attitudes among owners/managers.
• Reluctance of owners/managers to alter their perspectives on environmental sustainability practices.
• Lack of awareness among stakeholders regarding the advantages of environmental sustainability practices compared to potential price increases.
• Limited knowledge about technological advancements and their potential benefits for overall SME performance.
• Implementation of laws and regulations mandating SMEs to adopt environmental sustainability practices.
• Flexibility in altering the existing setup.
• Proximity and strong ties with suppliers.
• Commitment of owner management towards incorporating environmental sustainability practices.
• Introduction of green innovative products.
• Utilization of part-time employees to align with new practices.
• Enhanced awareness about the benefits of environmental sustainability practices.
• Influence from community expectations regarding environmental sustainability.
• Increasing interest from investors in supporting and promoting environmental sustainability practices.

In reality, adopting sustainability requires resources, however, SMEs already facing several challenges [30]. On the other side, SMEs strive to gain flexibility and adaptability [31], unfortunately SMEs often lack the resources to implement sustainable practices [10]. Researchers argue that factors such as time constraints, financial limitations, inadequate training, information access and a lack of environmental management are hindering SMEs in practicing environmental sustainability [13, 32]. A limited number of staff and routine work leave no time for learning and implementing sustainability measures [32]. Hiring professionals to train existing employees can help, however, financial constraints restrict SMEs to invest in knowledge and ability enhancement. Another aspect is employee or manager reluctance towards green innovation due to tight schedule, lack of experience or latest knowledge [33]. Environmental practices require pro-environmental behavior of employees [34]. To address this problem, companies should establish a network and enhance their relationship with external partners [35], such as universities, to provide cost-effective training for their staff. Establishing short-term objectives may facilitate the achievement of long-term goals, allowing SMEs to foster internal sustainability.

The limited financial capital of SMEs creates a significant constraint in SMEs ability to invest in environmental sustainability practices. The impact of these investments on profits remains a lingering question. Despite the potential benefits, SMEs may struggle to sustain the financial burden of implementing environmental sustainability measures [36]. Consequently, SMEs can apply for grants and loans from government agencies and financial institutions to alleviate financial constraints, which, in return, help them to bring sustainability in process and increase revenue in long term. However, lack of financial support from government and financial institutions and formal lengthy procedures creates hindrances in adopting sustainable practices [13, 37]. Despite the awareness and willingness of owners and managers to embrace environmental sustainability, financial constraints prevent them from environmental initiatives or involving third parties [38].

Moreover, the decision to adopt environmental sustainability practices in SMEs lies with the owners and managers, who act as the decision-makers. Their perception of the benefits associated with pro-environmental behavior is a key factor in determining whether they choose to invest in such practices [34]. A positive attitude towards environmental sustainability is essential for owners and managers to initiate such practices in their firms [38, 39]. Manager’s age determines the adaptation of sustainable practices and concerns for environmental performance [40]. Education and green entrepreneurial orientation also play a significant role in adopting sustainable practices in SMEs [35]. SMEs are mostly governed by their owners and family members hence they align their resources with their priority, and survival is the topmost priority. Thus, sustainability may be considered on priority in SMEs when owners, family member or managers have environmental instincts and can foresee that bringing sustainability is new way of survival.

On the other hand, the interests of stakeholders play a significant role in firm’s approach towards environmental sustainability at different levels within the business [41]. Stakeholders often prioritize financial sustainability over social and environmental sustainability, as long as they receive some sort of return [42]. Large organizations can establish long-term partnerships with stakeholders and the resources to influence through marketing strategies. Albeit SMEs find it difficult to maintain the relationships in long-term and often have shorter-term relationships with stakeholders, thus making it difficult for SMEs to change their perceptions [25]. SMEs are supposed to have a responsibility to the community, customers, and employees they serve [37, 38, 43]. Jamali et al. [44] argue that SMEs operate on a personal level and are closer to their stakeholders due to work-family issues, trust, and employee retention, among other factors. Moreover, when owners see market forces and customers direction towards eco-friendly processes and products, they may shift their focus on sustainability. Researchers claim that owners may not consider sustainability issues until they face a problem and are not motivated to do so as long as they are reaping profits [45].

Environmental sustainability practices and firm performance

The incorporation of sustainable practices in SMEs is influenced by various factors [10, 13]. These factors include the motivation of entrepreneurs to adopt certain practices based on their perception of potential positive financial outcomes or their concerns about the consequences of not embracing eco-friendly approaches [46]. The actions taken towards sustainability can either positively or negatively impact the financial performance of SMEs. Some researchers suggested that implementing sustainability practices is considered an additional burden by SMEs [47], while others support that there is positive relationship between firm performance and environmental protection efforts [8, 36].

Environmental Management System (EMS) has proven to be highly beneficial for the sustainable development of SMEs. ISO 14001 offers certified guidelines to assist SMEs in reducing their environmental impact and achieving long term sustainability [48]. By implementing EMS, SMEs can lower energy consumption costs while also creating positive image in the eyes of customers, regulators, and the public. Furthermore, EMS enables SMEs to utilize latest green technology, which not only reduces costs and improves productivity but also minimizes their negative impact on the environment. This innovative approach to resource utilization, cost reduction and environmental preservation ultimately ensures the sustainability of SMEs [24, 49]. Additionally, when SMEs collaborate with businesses within their network and receive support from organizations, they become more environmentally innovative and effectively reduce costs [22]. This ability to leverage network advantages is crucial for SMEs. Subsequently, adoption of environmental practices allows SMEs to position themselves as excellent performers [50].

Researchers suggested that financial limitations were inversely related to the adoption of practices. However, it also revealed a correlation between access to capital and technological expertise with the implementation of sustainability measures regardless of company size [50]. Various approaches can be utilized to assess the impact of environmental sustainability practices on firm performance. These include enhancing stability, reducing emissions, improving eco-efficiency systems, conserving materials, energy and implementing ISO 14001 certification [9, 8, 24, 48]. Performance measures may involve creating environmentally friendly production processes and adopting innovative techniques. By adopting environmental sustainability practices firms can enhance their systems to minimize water usage, air pollution and toxic waste emissions [51]. Therefore, managers of SMEs who implement sustainability measures often believe in adopting innovative technologies [52].

The positive impact of effectively implemented EMS, on performance has been evident [48, 53]. Therefore, implementation of EMS leads to improved environmental performance, including reductions in water consumption and waste emissions. Previous studies found that the adoption of EMS practices provides benefits to SMEs [53]. Improvements in environmental performance and cost reduction go hand in hand. Eco-design plays a role in creating products with better recycling potential and improved performance. Furthermore, these eco-friendly designs are not only less harmful but also cost-effective to manufacture, leading to reduced expenses and improved firm performance [54]. When organizations strive to reduce pollution, it ultimately results in resource utilization and increased productivity. Sustainable practices like recycling and collaborating with suppliers contribute to cost reduction and enhanced efficiency. By utilizing metal scraps, waste materials, and recycled oil within SMEs operations along, with water recycling and purification measures, all contribute to cost reduction while simultaneously boosting profits.

Furthermore, implementing environmental protection initiatives can influence firm image [54]. Firms’ performance heavily relies on their knowledge-based resources and the ability to effectively utilize these resources to gain advantages [52]. However, researchers argue that being an eco-friendly organization does not necessarily guarantee strong competitiveness in the market [50].

Conceptual framework

This study proposes a research model to investigate sustainability in SMEs. Previous studies have examined how internal and external factors affect knowledge and attitudes toward environmentally conscious management practices [55]. This study included external and internal factors as independent variables, which encompasses suppliers, customers, and laws. These characteristics motivate and challenge management to adopt environmental sustainability initiatives. Stakeholder impact on SMEs is further influenced by environmental awareness and attitudes, which address top management understanding of the cost and benefits of being environmentally sustainable. These variables influence environmental sustainability practices, serving as dependent variable. Hence, external and internal factors influence the organization’s attitude and understanding of environmental sustainability, which defines its policies, strategies, and systems for sustainable development. This process is influenced by owner-manager qualities, time, financial resources, and cost-benefit information about environmental sustainability. Without these criteria, SMEs may struggle to implement environmental sustainability initiatives. The effects of these factors need to be examined in the context of developing countries. Fig 1 depicts the research framework.

Fig 1. Conceptual framework.

Fig 1

Methodology

The target population for this study was SMEs, defined as firms with fewer than 250 employees [56], located in Balochistan, Pakistan. The industrial states included in the study were Quetta industrial and trading state, Hub industrial and trading state, Uthal industrial state, and Marble City. Due to the lack of proper records or censuses of SMEs in Balochistan, the researchers used convenience and purposive sampling techniques for data collection [57].

The data collection method used was a semi-structured interview based on an interviewer-administered questionnaire. This method was chosen because it was believed to provide in-depth understanding of subject matter [58]. The interview questionnaire was adapted from a similar study by [55] and revised based on a pilot study and expert opinions to ensure validity and reliability. This research adhered to ethical guidelines, securing respondent consent prior to interviews. Additionally, the authors sought ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB). However, the IRB returned the application with the recommendation that no ethical review is necessary for this research study. The research process followed in this study is presented in Fig 2.

Fig 2. Flow chart of research process.

Fig 2

Data collection

Data collection was carried out over a period of five months and involved a combination of convenience and purposive sampling techniques. The study began with a meeting with the head of Small and Medium Enterprises Development Authority (SMEDA) in Balochistan, Pakistan. The starting point for sampling was well-educated SME owners, and initial contact was made through phone calls. Appointments were set after presenting the interviewees with a letter of consent. The data collection process continued for several months in Quetta City, with the majority of manufacturing SMEs located in Hub City. As such, additional time was required for arrangements and contact. The head of the Chamber of Commerce in Hub and the Lasbela Industrial Estate Development Authority (LIEDA) were consulted for support and references to reach SME owners. Due to the conservative and underdeveloped environment in Balochistan and the prevalence of terrorism, the respondents were only met when referred by a reliable reference.

During the interviews, a survey was conducted to determine the respondent’s capability to understand, judge, and answer research questions. The survey questions were designed to obtain responses related to the adoption of sustainable practices in SMEs, and the interviews were conducted in person, demographic information of respondent is shown in Table 2. The interview method proved beneficial in providing diverse views and answers related to different businesses.

Table 2. Demographic information.

Characteristics Frequency Percentage
Gender
Male 29 96.67
Female 1 3.33
Sector
Restaurant 2 6.67
Hotel 2 6.67
Furniture 3 10.00
Agriculture 2 6.67
Marble production 5 16.67
Beauty parlor 2 6.67
Motor Garage 2 6.67
UPS manufacturers 2 6.67
Salt company 1 3.33
Steel plating 1 3.33
Lubricants 1 3.33
Wheel manufacturers 1 3.33
PVC pipe manufacturers 1 3.33
Service stations 1 3.33
Dry item suppliers 1 3.33
Shopping marts 1 3.33
Gems and Jewelry suppliers 1 3.33
Mosaic 1 3.33
Location
Quetta 18 60.00
Hub 10 33.33
Winder 1 3.33
Khuzdar 1 3.33
Position
Owner 15 50.00
Senior Manager 15 50.00

This study employed non-probability sampling technique; however, efforts were made to ensure that the sample was diverse and representative of the population of SMEs in the region. Moreover, due to the sensitive nature of the topic and the underdeveloped environment in Balochistan, the sample size was limited to 30 SMEs. However, prior studies recommended a sample size of 12–20 for qualitative research [59, 60]. Hence, the sample size of this study is deemed acceptable [61]. Despite these limitations, the present study provides valuable insights into the barriers to sustainable practice adoption in SMEs in Balochistan, Pakistan. Table 3 summarizes the respondent’s answers to interview questions as “yes” or “no” to enable further discussion.

Table 3. Summary of responses.

Interview Questions Response
Yes No
Awareness of environmental sustainability
1. “Is the term ecopreneur familiar to you?” 2 28
2. “We are aware of the solid and liquid waste management problems in the city.” 28 2
3. “We are aware of the problems about city’s sources of drinking water.” 28 2
4. “We are aware of the problems about city’s sources of electricity.” 28 2
5. “We develop product or services with corresponding natural environmental impact in mind.” 4 26
External factors and environmental sustainability
1. “Firms communicate with customers/buyers about environmental issues.” 3 27
2. “Firms deal with suppliers or distributors with environmentally friendly business practices.” 3 27
3. “Role of government Legislations in infusing environmental sustainability practices in SMEs.” 4 26
Internal factors and environmental sustainability practices.
1. “Availability of adequate financial resources and availability of positive cash flows.” 11 19
2. “Access to credit and loans from banks and other financial institutions.” 14 16
3. “Can easily raise funds to support plans for expansion of production capacity?” 11 19
4. “Adequate financial resources to support further training and development of employees.” 4 26
5. “Adequate financial resources to develop or buy new production machinery.” 10 20
Owners/managers attitude towards environmental sustainability practices
1. “We (i.e. managers and employees) have adequate knowledge about environmental sustainability and global warming, climate change etc?” 6 24
2. “Environment-friendly manufacturing practices are good for any business?” 6 24
3. “Which media has played its role in increasing awareness about environment issues?” 30 0
4. “Does religion teach the lesson of ethics?” 5 25
5. “Corporate social responsibility generates many profits?” 10 20
6. “Environmental sustainability should be present in in all organizations?” 20 10
7. “We know that business have important role to play in environmental protection.” 2 28
8. “Is profit making better than care of environment?” 27 3
9. “Recycling of production waste is a normal practice in business?” 15 15
10. “The business gains more customers as a result of being environment-friendly business?” 3 27
Environmental sustainability practices
1 “Company’s policy regarding the environmental friendliness of the usage of resources in the business processes, such as water, gas, electricity and other natural resources.” 3 27
2. “Policy regarding conservation of resources and reuse of waste materials?” 26 4
3. “Training of employees includes environmental awareness?” 6 24
4. “Firms practice in voluntary environmental programs?” 6 24

Results

The collected data from the semi-structured interviews was analyzed using coding techniques and condensed into main themes for further examination [62], presented in Table 4. The researcher repeatedly read through the data and utilized word clouds to identify sub-themes, consolidate common themes, and identify main themes, Fig 3 depicts the word clouds. A final review was conducted to identify any important or conflicting information related to the established themes.

Table 4. Emerged themes.

Themes Sub-themes
General Overview of SMEs’ Environmental Awareness Level of Education
Sound knowledge
Lack of education
International Business Impact
Perception of Environmentally Friendly Practices Long-Term Investments
Conservation
External Factors Impacting Sustainability Practices Influence of international customers on environmental policies
Challenges with environmentally friendly practices
Government involvement in promoting sustainability
Adoption of sustainable practices
Internal Factors Impacting Sustainability Practices Scale of Business
Varied business performance across sectors
Challenges in accessing credit and loans
Training and development
Lack of financial resources for environmentally safe machinery
Impact of Awareness and Attitudes on Sustainability Practices Influence of education on understanding sustainability
Different views on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profit
Willingness to adopt environmentally friendly practices for long-term sustainability
Religious and ethical perspectives on environmental responsibility
Environmental Practices (Policies, Strategies, Systems) Presence and nature of environmental policies
Resource conservation and waste material reuse efforts
Inclusion of environmental perspective in employee training
Participation in voluntary environmental programs
Challenges faced in implementing sustainability practices

Fig 3. Word clouds of responses.

Fig 3

Theme one: Awareness of environmental sustainability

The initial stage of the research process involved an overview of environmental sustainability concerns and an assessment of the level of awareness among owners and senior managers of SMEs. The term sustainability was frequently interchanged with environmental care practices, but the concept of ecopreneurship was relatively unfamiliar to most of the interviewees. However, respondents with higher levels of education generally had a better understanding of environmental protection within their production processes. Meanwhile, those who were less educated did not possess any knowledge in this regard and did not adopt any environmental precautions in their business operations.

When asked about their understanding of the sources and problems of drinking water and electricity in their city, all respondents agreed that these issues were prevalent and that load shedding of electricity had significantly impacted their businesses. Some entrepreneurs were able to survive by relying on alternatives such as solar panels, but others had suffered significant losses. The scarcity of water was another challenge faced by most SMEs, both for drinking and business purposes. Despite the difficulties, most respondents felt that it was not their role as entrepreneurs to preserve water and electricity. Respondents highlighted that the cost of running business was already high, and the additional expense of water testing and purification only added to their burden.

One hotel owner said that “running a hotel is a big responsibility and it increases our cost when we buy water from private vendors, if Quetta did not face the water scarcity problems, then we would also have benefited from it.”

Another owner from a marble factory in Hub City said that “although the water came from Hub Dam and its dependent on the level of rain. Water was there but it was not clean they had to arrange their own purification plants and filters, so that was also an expense.

When discussing the firms’ practices in developing products or services with consideration for their environmental impact, it was clear that the environment was not a significant concern for most SMEs. Very few firms had policies in place to minimize negative environmental impact, and these were mostly ISO-certified businesses that dealt with international clients. For the rest of the firms, their focus was on making enough profit to remain competitive in the market rather than considering the environmental impact of their operations.

Manager of steel plant said, “It seems like we should adopt eco-friendly practices not just sake of environment but also for the benefit of our society as well as for profit.

While the majority of SME owners tended to recognize the effects of businesses on the environment and the importance of being environmentally conscious, they also expressed their need for government support in this regard. The concept of sustainability was often misunderstood, with many respondents confusing it with environmental issues. However, when the term environmental sustainability was explained to them in detail, they were able to grasp its significance and the importance of considering this issue in their business operations.

Theme two: External factors, environmental awareness, and attitude

The second theme of the study aimed to identify the impact of external factors on environmental sustainability practices. The firms were divided into two categories: those dealing with local customers and those dealing with international customers. Firms dealing with only local customers reported that cost was the primary concern of their customers, while firms dealing with international customers indicated that they were bound to follow certain policies, including environmental policies, to meet international business standards. The companies that were ISO-certified reported that it was mandatory for them to be environmentally sustainable in order to attract international customers.

One respondent said that “its mandatory for them to be environmentally sustainable to capture customers at international level”.

SMEs faced a different set of challenges when dealing with environmentally friendly suppliers and distributors. If the SMEs had multiple choices of suppliers to select from or were bound by their customers to work with environmentally friendly businesses, they opted for environmentally friendly suppliers. On the other hand, SMEs in Balochistan province mainly dealt with local suppliers and distributors who lacked education and awareness about environmental sustainability issues. Most of the marble suppliers in this region belonged to poor communities and were not supported by any government agencies, making them bound to market trends in terms of supply.

The firms that had sufficient knowledge and were aware of the importance of environmental sustainability had adopted methods to be environmentally sustainable, but not to their full potential due to the lack of support from government organizations. They expressed a desire to work towards environmental protection but faced challenges due to the lack of awareness and adoption of environmentally sustainable practices in the supply chain. The focus on cost reduction rather than environmental protection also presented an obstacle. According to the results of the study, the government in Quetta seems to have little to no involvement in promoting environmental sustainability among SMEs. The respondents reported a lack of awareness of any governmental institutions or initiatives aimed at promoting environmentally safe practices.

One respondent said that “now a day’s metropolitan of Balochistan had signed a contract with the Turkish company to manage recycling of waste.

According to this new contract, counselors in every area would need to sign a contract and agree to pay a fund in the earliest days to pick up and recycle the waste for few early years, and after some time, when the company gets established, the Turkish company instead of taking money would pay money for managing waste products.

Respondent from oil manufacturing firm said that “LIEDA is playing its role of waste management and EPA (Environmental protection agency) occasionally shows its concern in Hub”.

Theme three: Internal factors, environmental awareness, and attitude

The business performance of various sectors was assessed, and the results were varied. While some businesses, such as restaurants, lubricants, rice dealers, and furniture, were reported to be operating successfully and were financially stable, many others were struggling to survive and expressed concern about their current situation.

A respondent from a tin making firm said that “my business had suffered losses in the past few years but had reached a breakeven point the previous year. However, the business remained at risk as tin was being rapidly replaced by plastic.

The manager of a mosaic making firm reported a sluggish financial situation, as the cessation of funding from a donor had resulted in increased expenses while their revenue remained stagnant. The manager attributed this to the low level of awareness and advertising of mosaic products, which primarily cater to high-end society and hotels.

Most of the respondents from the marble factories reported that the industry was facing stiff competition and was plagued by high waste due to a lack of proper machinery. This led to many marble factories closing due to losses, with only a few who had access to modern machinery and cutting-edge technology being able to remain profitable. The remaining businesses were fighting for survival.

SMEs are facing challenges in accessing credit from banks and other financial institutions due to difficult and lengthy bank procedures, high interest rates, and the risk of losing their businesses to repay loans. Some of the SMEs interviewed had positive views about accessing credit, saying that if they were registered and had an NIT number, they would easily get loans. However, even these SMEs were hesitant due to the burdensome procedures involved. A few respondents mentioned that if they had personal contacts with bank officials, they would not face any problems accessing credit. On the other hand, some of the SMEs had negative views and highlighted that they were unable to meet their monetary needs, and they faced difficulties in accessing credit and loans.

Respondents from the marble factory said that “banks nearly took over our business as factory was kept as collateral”.

The CEO of a mosaic making firm said that “SMEs in the mosaic making industry face many difficulties in accessing financial institutions.

When asked about the possibility of raising funds for expanding production capacity, the SMEs were divided. Some SMEs in a sound financial position were capable of raising funds from their businesses, family, friends, and relatives, while others were struggling to survive and had no intention of expanding.

The owner of marble company said that “we thought to easily raise funds from the business community and friends, but the current conditions in the Marble City and the downward trend of business made it difficult to attract any further investments”.

On the other hand, a manager from a salt making firm said that “the company had a mission to reinvest, and it could easily raise funds for expansion from equity or risk.

Training and development of employees were also a concern for the SMEs. The firms in a sound financial position were willing and able to support their employees, while those struggling to survive were reluctant to do so.

The owner of a rice distribution firm said that “we sent their employees for further education and paid training to keep them competitive and aware of modern business techniques”.

The wheel making and salt refinery firms had training as part of their regular policies, and employees were given training for promotion and continuous learning. However, only a few of the thirty firms interviewed considered their employees valuable assets and invested in their training and development. The availability of financial resources to develop or buy new, environmentally safe production machinery was another concern.

The respondent from a tin plating firm said that “the company wants to take a bank loan for the long-term profitability and better production machinery.

The manager of a salt refinery firm said that “expertise in machinery was not available in Pakistan, so we are working on upgrading machinery from foreign sources for better production and environmental safety”.

Some of the oil refining firms made small investments in new equipment for innovation. However, the majority of the marble factories were suffering from a lack of investment in new machinery and did not have government support in this regard. Only a few marble factories that were able to invest in new machinery were earning more profits and were environmentally safe.

One owner from a marble factory said that “we are not interested in investing in new machinery as the business is not future-promising. Although we are in the position to afford it.

This is contradictory situation where, at one side, SMEs claim that due to lack of financial resources, they are not able to invest in latest machinery, on the other side, some firms can afford but only invest to see the profit prospect of the business, not the environmental sustainability.

Theme 4: Environmental awareness, attitudes, and environmental sustainability

The culture of an organization is shaped by its employees, with senior managers and owners setting the standards and policies. When asked about their knowledge of environmental sustainability and climate change, the level of education of the respondents was found to be a facilitator or a hindrance. Those with a higher level of education had a better understanding of the topic, while others were less informed. The manager of a mosaic-making firm, who was MPhil scholar, was proud of his company’s adoption of environmentally sustainable practices.

He said that “the company uses leftover marble residuals in the production of mosaic in partnership with an international donor company to turn waste into profit”.

The majority of respondents agreed that being environmentally friendly is good for business. However, a minority who did not agree were conservative in their approach and lacked education and awareness of the benefits of eco-friendly business. The respondent from the mosaic manufacturing SME saw conservation and precautions as long-term investments, while another from a marble factory expressed concern for the environment and the impact it would have on their business if they did not adopt environmentally friendly practices. SMEs that did business internationally, such as marble, mosaic, and salt, stated that being environmentally friendly was part of doing business. These firms reported that international companies refuse to do business with those who do not have an environmental care aspect in their business. The media, including television and the internet, was acknowledged by the respondents for increasing awareness of environmental issues.

Nearly all respondents agreed that religion teaches the importance of ethics and environmental sustainability. For example, one respondent from the marble factory said that their religion emphasizes cleanliness and that being socially and environmentally responsible is part of their belief.

Manager from the oil industry said that “In Islam the first and foremost thing is care of humans and for that ethics bound us to take care of our environment. Religion Islam gives us the teaching that one human should not hurt the other, so if we act upon it then according to this care of others, care of society and care of environment is definitely part of our ethics”.

Most of the firms interviewed saw corporate social responsibility as a tool for creating good will among the public. The respondents from the restaurant industry said that; “According to me the answer is definitely corporate responsibility generates more profits because in our business it all depends on the care of customers, providing them with fresh & healthy food in a healthy & clean environment is the core of our business & that’s possible only if we are careful about the corporate responsibility”.

Established SMEs, such as the tin plating firm, made efforts to fulfill their corporate social responsibilities by planting a water purification plant in a village suffering from polluted water and by running schools. The oil refining firm saw corporate social responsibility as a long-term investment, as it prevents the spread of diseases like hepatitis among their workers and their families. The Marble City respondents expressed their efforts to fulfill their responsibilities but faced hurdles from uneducated workers and non-cooperative labor. Four respondents did not agree that corporate social responsibility and profit margins go together. The manager from the salt industry saw it as a matter of economics rather than social responsibility and stated that their company provides medical facilities and schools for their workers. They believed that thinking about profit and social responsibility at the same time leads to a conflict of interest. All of the participants had a positive opinion, saying that environment is preferable to us, as this is where we live and want it to be secured. They support environmental sustainability being present in all firms, although it may reduce profit.

One respondent said, "As we deal with rice supply, we used to pack our rice in plastic bags but after realizing that this is harmful for the environment we changed to paper bags for packing. Although it increased our cost but for long-term sustainability it seemed more preferable.”

The respondent working at the Parlor had an opinion regarding the presence of environmental sustainability in organizations by saying that “In our business environmental sustainability does not decrease profit rather, it gives us competitive advantage, when our customers observe us using environmentally friendly products, they come more often and spread good words, resulting in increased customers and more profit.”

One of the business owners stated that business was done for profit, but it was also necessary to care for the environment as it was the home where the business was located. The environment and the earth were the sources of all the resources used in production and it was impossible to move forward without taking care of the environment. Half of the respondents agreed to recycle their production waste when questioned about it, while the other half either had no waste or were unaware of recycling practices. The manager of a tin plating company reported that the water used in their process was recycled and the tin scraps and hardboard leftovers were sold to packing companies for box making. The gems and jewelry company reused their residual materials in fine jewelry and synthetic items. The respondent from a salt company reused salt waste by evaporating water using the sun’s heat. An oil refinery invited experts from Switzerland to help manage their waste and recycling efforts and had reclamation plants to clean dirty oil for reuse. However, the used oil did not receive a proper price. Finally, the respondents who were already working at an international level stated that being environmentally friendly was necessary to do business at an international level. They said that being ISO certified was important to gain international customers as it required firms to operate in an environmentally safe manner. The same was true for restaurant businesses, as they were required to follow policies and criteria to do business at an international level.

Theme five: Environmental practices (policies, strategies, systems)

Most firms interviewed, except for three SMEs, did not have a written policy on environmental sustainability practices. The firms with environmental policies only did so to meet ISO certification requirements. The manager of the wheel manufacturing firm reported having an ISO certification for two years, which includes environmental policy. The oil refinery company also had an environmental policy, which they upgraded periodically.

When asked about resource conservation and waste material reuse, the owners and managers gave varying answers, but the message was consistent that they strive to conserve resources but face opposition from their workers. The manager of the tin plating company said they are trying to replace inefficient heaters with more efficient ones, but their workers are uncooperative. The wheel manufacturing firm has made efforts to conserve water and electricity by switching to energy-saving bulbs. The oil refinery firm efficiently uses the boiler to maximize production. The respondent from Marble City said that despite efforts to conserve electricity and water, uneducated workers often ignore the advice, causing problems for the company. Overall, the respondents agreed that resource conservation leads to cost reduction.

Many SMEs provided general training to their employees on the usage of machinery and chemicals, however, only some of them included environmental perspective in their training. For example, the respondent from the tin plating company stated that their employees were trained to handle chemical waste and use machinery in an environmentally conscious manner, but most of them being uneducated, did not understand the significance. The manager of the oil refinery company mentioned that they did provide training on environmental aspects, as even a small oil leak could cause significant land pollution, which they aim to avoid.

The respondent from the mosaic firm added that their international organization required them to train their employees on various subjects, including the environment. Most of the respondents acknowledged that they tried to guide their employees on environmental protection, but the lack of education was a major hindrance to understanding the concept. However, one of the marble factories, being a big organization, provided step-by-step training to all their employees on various aspects. The owner of the furniture company stated that their employees were trained based on their level of knowledge.

When asked about voluntary environmental programs, the participation of SMEs varied depending on their financial position and level of environmental awareness. For instance, the tin plating company had a water purification plant to conserve water, while the salt-making company focused on providing health care facilities and education rather than environmental programs. The oil refinery company mentioned their hepatitis vaccine campaign as a voluntary program to save the environment from contagious diseases. One of the respondents from Marble City said that his organization was working very efficiently in voluntary environmental programs like tree plantations, etc., but water consumption and costs of purchasing water increased, and he was not able to continue it. The mosaic-making firm stated that their voluntary program involved training females on how to reuse and conserve resources, maximize their income and reduce waste. However, one of the respondents from Marble City mentioned that although their organization was working efficiently on voluntary environmental programs such as tree plantations, the increased water consumption and purchasing costs made it difficult for them to continue these initiatives.

Discussion

The study aimed to understand the level of awareness among owners and senior managers of SMEs regarding environmental sustainability issues. The results are aligned with strategic abilities of NRBV theory, such as pollution prevention, product stewardship, and sustainable development. NRBV provides support for the theme of this study, which encompasses environmental-orientation, responsible environmental management, and eco-friendly operations.

The qualitative analysis revealed that majority of SMEs owners or managers were not familiar with the term "ecopreneurship." This was primarily due to their low level of education, knowledge, or lack of concern for environmental issues. Researcher argues that environmental practices rely on equal involvement from all employees and lack of knowledge hinders their implementation [20]. In Balochistan, the shortage of electricity, water, law enforcement and mismanagement are well known [16]. Every respondent interviewed acknowledged this problem and agreed on the need to conserve these resources. However, the awareness was limited to owners and managers, and they faced difficulties in making their workers understand and address sustainability.

Most SMEs, except for a few that were ISO certified, did not consider environmental impact in their business practices. Firms that obtained ISO certification only did so to expand their international business, as certification was mandatory for international business dealings. These findings are consistent with previous literature suggesting that unawareness and lack of laws are major reasons for environmental harm [63]. When law enforcement is weak, people tend to harm the environment. However, strict regulations and the fear of punishment may prompt SMEs to make changes that help them understand the costs and benefits of their actions. Hence, external pressure such as regulatory compliance and legal certainty, is a primary motivator for firms to adopt environmental practices [18, 32]. Thus, it is important for customers, governments, and supportive organizations to work together to educate and encourage SMEs to adopt environmentally sustainable practices.

Sustainable practices play a critical role for businesses in boosting their market share. Researchers suggested that sustainable practices offer benefits such as enhanced market position, increased customer base, and competitive edge [64]. In line with previous studies, this study identified that SMEs that are ISO-certified believe they must be environmentally sustainable to capture international customers [37, 38, 43, 44]. Further, external factors, such as customers, can act as both motivators and obstacles for SMEs in terms of adopting environmentally sustainable practices. However, local customers who are price-sensitive may be hesitant to accept the potential price increases that come with environmentally sustainable practices. Meanwhile, SMEs in Balochistan province face further hurdles as their supply chains come from poor backgrounds, lacking financial resources and government support, forcing them to prioritize their livelihood over environmental sustainability [65].

The adoption of environmental sustainability practices by SMEs is a subject of debate due to their limited financial capital. It remains unclear whether such investments will result in increased profits or whether SMEs may face financial challenges when engaging in such practices [36]. On the other hand, applying for grants and loans from government agencies, energy service companies, or non-government organizations can help SMEs overcome financial constraints and pursue environmental sustainability [66]. However, some studies have suggested that the willingness to adopt environmental sustainability practices has nothing to do with the economics or size of the firm but rather depends on the awareness and attitude of the company [67]. In the case of the SMEs in Balochistan Province, financial constraints were the main reason for their reluctance to invest in environmentally sustainable practices. While they could have sought financial help from personal sources, the complicated bank process and the prevailing business and security conditions made them hesitant to do so.

The positive mindset and attitude of the owners are crucial in driving environmental sustainability initiatives within the firm [38, 39]. SMEs, being owned and operated by their founders, can align their resources with their priorities, including prioritizing long-term sustainability over short-term profits [37]. If they see benefits in such environmental practices, they may allocate finances towards them, but if they view it as a long-term investment, they may be reluctant to adopt even if they have the means to do so [68]. The owners and managers may focus on certain sustainability aspects while disregarding others, depending on their mentality [69]. However, some owners may only consider sustainability issues when they face problems and otherwise prioritize profits over sustainability [66, 67].

The limited knowledge of SMEs owners and managers may lead them to believe that pro-environmental measures are costly without considering the long-term benefits, such as the reduction of toxic waste and energy consumption through eco-friendly machinery and practices like using energy-saving light fixtures [70]. Researchers contended that further incentives are needed to convince SMEs owners to take bolder pro-environmental measures, even if they have already taken initial steps [71]. Moreover, the study highlights that religion plays a role in shaping attitudes toward environmental sustainability. Nearly all religions teach similar moral values, but the intensity and nature of belief may vary [72]. Researchers showed a correlation between religion and environmental sustainability [73], where owners in Balochistan agreed that religion teaches ethical values, but finances, lack of education, and knowledge limit the practical application of these values.

These findings are in collaboration with previous studies that support a positive correlation between environmental awareness and practices among SME owners/managers [22, 52, 55]. This study suggests that SMEs may struggle to implement environmental management practices due to a lack of awareness of their environmental impact. Moreover, environmental awareness is influenced by legislation, leading to formal compliance systems and changes in conservation behavior within SMEs [53]. The majority of SMEs owners and managers lack the education and research environment to adopt pro-environmental practices, and their attitudes are shaped by media exposure. Some established SMEs practice corporate social responsibility, while others view it as separate from profit-making or as a burden on their income.

Managerial implications

The study provides significant implications for SMEs owners, managers, government, and environmental agencies. First, it is utmost important for both owners and workers to have access to education regarding environmental initiatives and their advantages. Closing the knowledge gap through workshops and training programs is essential, not only for aware SMEs but also to make them stick to eco-friendly protocols. Additionally, government agencies and environmental NGOs should advocate for increased government support and incentives as financial limitations pose a barrier. Second, SMEs should view ISO certification not as a requirement but also as a strategic tool that provides an advantage in accessing international markets. SMEs should engage with customers to raise awareness about the benefits of eco-friendly practices, which can help address customers’ concerns about increased prices. Third, SMEs should position themselves as environmentally friendly organizations that open opportunities for financial support mechanisms such as environmental initiative grants and loans. Fourth, managers should develop CSR strategies that align with SMEs priorities, which create shared value and enhance reputation. Fifth, managers should collaborate with other environmental agencies and establish networks with NGOs and governmental agencies to amplify the impact of sustainability initiatives. Managers should also explore the opportunities for adaptation of climate friendly technologies and processes. Sixth, government agencies should take initiatives to foster a mindset among SMEs owners by emphasizing how sustainability aligns with long term profitability. Finally, government agencies should develop policies to monitor and evaluate environmental initiatives and performance of SMEs, which ensures improvement and adaptation to environmental initiatives. These research implications contribute to long term success and sustainable development of SMEs.

Conclusion

This study examines the impact of internal and external factors on the environmental sustainability of SMEs in Balochistan, Pakistan. The qualitative research method was used to gain a deeper understanding of the motivators and barriers towards environmental sustainability. This study indicated that adoption of environmental sustainability practices by SMEs is influenced by a combination of internal and external factors. Further, awareness and attitude of the company owners and managers play a critical role in implementation of environmentally sustainable practices. Internal factors, such as financial constraints and lack of awareness, were identified as the primary reasons for the limited adoption of environmentally sustainable practices among SMEs in Balochistan province. However, the study also found that applying for grants and loans from government agencies or non-government organizations can help SMEs overcome financial constraints and pursue environmental sustainability. Further, external factors, such as customers and government policies, play a crucial role in promoting environmental sustainability among SMEs. In the similar vein, these internal and external factors significantly influence eco-friendly attitude and awareness of SMEs owners or managers, which leads to overcome barriers such as lack of knowledge, polices, training, and foster positive attitude for adoption of environmental sustainability practices within SMEs.

Supporting information

S1 Data set

(XLSX)

pone.0298580.s001.xlsx (28.1KB, xlsx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Ganivet E. Growth in human population and consumption both need to be addressed to reach an ecologically sustainable future. Environ Dev Sustain. 2020;22(6):4979–4998. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kamah M, Riti JS, Bin P. Inclusive growth and environmental sustainability: the role of institutional quality in sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:34885–34901. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13125-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khan MR, Khan HR, Ghouri AM. Corporate social responsibility, sustainability governance and sustainable performance: A preliminary insight. Asian Acad Manag J. 2022;27(1):1–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jabbour ABLD, Ndubisi NO, Seles BMRP. Sustainable development in Asian manufacturing SMEs: Progress and directions. Int J Prod Econ. 2020;225:107567. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jansson J, Nilsson J, Modig F, Hed Vall G. Commitment to sustainability in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The influence of strategic orientations and management values. Bus Strateg Environ. 2017;26(1):69–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anesa M, Bressan A. SMEs tax minimization as shared responsibility. Crit Perspect Account. 2024;98:102698. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Martin-Tapia AJ, Aragon-Correa EM, Senise-Barrio M. Environmental strategy and exports in medium, small and micro-enterprises. J World Bus. 2010;45:266–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Le TT. How do corporate social responsibility and green innovation transform corporate green strategy into sustainable firm performance? J Clean Prod. 2022;362:132228. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ali A, Khan MR, Ghouri AM. Carbon neutrality concept and progress. In: Recent Developments in Green Finance, Green Growth and Carbon Neutrality. Elsevier; 2023. p. 85–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang D, Si R, Fahad S. Evaluating the small and medium-sized enterprises motivating factors and influencing barriers about adoption of green practices. Environ Dev Sustain. 2023;25(4):3029–3041. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Boeske J, Murray PA. The intellectual domains of sustainability leadership in SMEs. Sustainability. 2022;14(4):1978. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jia F, Zuluaga-Cardona L, Bailey A, Rueda X. Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: An analysis of the literature. J Clean Prod. 2009;189:263–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Purwandani JA, Michaud G. What are the drivers and barriers for green business practice adoption for SMEs? Environ Syst Decis. 2021;41(4):577–593. doi: 10.1007/s10669-021-09821-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Elkington J. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ali G. Climate change and associated spatial heterogeneity of Pakistan: Empirical evidence using multidisciplinary approach. Sci Total Environ. 2018;634:95–108. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ayaz M, Jehan N, Nakonieczny J, Mentel U. Health costs of environmental pollution faced by underground coal miners: Evidence from Balochistan Pakistan. Resources Policy. 2022;76:102536. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumar L, Kumari R, Kumar A, Tunio IA, Sassanelli C. Water quality assessment and monitoring in Pakistan: A comprehensive review. Sustainability. 2023;15(7):6246. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Baah C, Opoku-Agyeman D, Acquah ISK, Agyabeng-Mensah Y, Afum E, Faibil D, et al. Examining the correlations between stakeholder pressures, green production practices, firm reputation, environmental and financial performance: evidence from manufacturing SMEs. Sustain Prod Consum. 2021;27:100–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Simmou W, Govindan K, Sameer I, Hussainey K, Simmou S. Doing good to be green and live clean! Linking corporate social responsibility strategy, green innovation, and environmental performance: Evidence from Maldivian and Moroccan small and medium-sized enterprises. J Clean Prod. 2023;384:135265. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pinkse J, Dommisee M. Overcoming barriers to sustainability: An explanation of residential builders reluctance to adopt clean technologies. Bus Strateg Environ. 2009;18:515–527. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pham HST, Tran HT. CSR disclosure and firm performance: The mediating role of corporate reputation and moderating role of CEO integrity. J Bus Res. 2020;120:127–136. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Journeault M, Perron A, Vallières L. The collaborative roles of stakeholders in supporting the adoption of sustainability in SMEs. J Environ Manage. 2021;287:112349. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kasi AM, Raziq A, Khan NR. Exploring environmental sustainability practices in Pakistani SMEs. J Ind Stud Res: Manage Social Sci Econ. 2019;17(2):17–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rodríguez-Espíndola O, Cuevas-Romo A, Chowdhury S, Díaz-Acevedo N, Albores P, Despoudi S, et al. The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs. Int J Prod Econ. 2022;248:108495. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rodriguez-Melo A, Mansouri S. Stakeholder Engagement: Defining Strategic Advantage for Sustainable Construction. Bus Strateg Environ. 2011;20:539‐552. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kumar M, Sharma M, Raut RD, Mangla SK, Choubey VK. Performance assessment of circular driven sustainable agri-food supply chain towards achieving sustainable consumption and production. J Clean Prod. 2022;372:133698. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pacheco DA, Carla S, Jung CF, Ribeiro JL D, Navas HV G, Cruz-Machado VA. Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs: Systematic review and research directions. J Clean Prod. 2017;142:2277–2287. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Epoh LR, Mafini C. Green supply chain management in small and medium enterprises: Further empirical thoughts from South Africa. J Transport Supply Chain Manag. 2018;12(1):1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hossain MI, Ong TS, Tabash MI, Siow ML, Said RM. Systematic literature review and future research directions: drivers of environmental sustainability practices in small and medium-sized enterprises. Int J Sustain Econ. 2022;14(3):269–293. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Siegel R, Antony J, Govindan K, Garza-Reyes JA, Lameijer B, Samadhiya A. A framework for the systematic implementation of Green-Lean and sustainability in SMEs. Prod Plan Control. 2024;35(1):71–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zighan SM, Dwaikat NY. Exploring organisational agility in SMEs. Int J Entrep Small Bus. 2023;49(4):561–576. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brammer S, Hoejmose S, Marchant K. Environmental management in SMEs in the UK: Practices, pressures and perceived benefits. Bus Strateg Environ. 2011;21(7):423–434. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Parida S, Brown K. Green human resource management and green innovation. In: Adae EK, Kosiba JPB, Hinson RE, Twum KK, Newman N, Nutsugah FF, editors. Responsible Management in Emerging Markets. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Palgrave Macmillan; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-76563-7_7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nisar S, Khan NR, Khan MR. Determinant analysis of employee attitudes toward pro-environmental behavior in textile firms of Pakistan: a serial mediation approach. Manage Environ Qual: An Int J. 2021;32(5):1064–1094. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ameer F, Khan NR. Green entrepreneurial orientation and corporate environmental performance: A systematic literature review. Eur Manage J. 2022. Ahead of print. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2022.04.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Vijfvinkel S, Bouman N, Hessels J. Environmental sustainability and financial performance of SMEs. Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs. 2011:3–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fassin Y. SMEs and the fallacy of formalising CSR. Bus Ethics: Eur Rev. 2008;17(4):364–378. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Murillo D, Lozano JM. SMEs and CSR: An approach to CSR in their own words. J Bus Ethics. 2006;67:227–240. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chi LHD, Hac LD, Nhat NQ, Hang BTT. Corporate environmental responsibility and financial performance: The moderating role of ownership structure and listing status of Vietnam banks. Cogent Economics Finance. 2022;10(1):2087286. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ameer F, Khan NR. National culture, employee’s engagement and employee’s CSR perceptions in technology based firms of Pakistan. J Manage Sci. 2019;6:54–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gonzales-Gemio C, Cruz-Cázares C, Parmentier MJ. Responsible innovation in SMEs: A systematic literature review for a conceptual model. Sustain. 2020;12(24):10232. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hoffman AJ, Henn R. Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building. Organ Environ. 2008;21(4):390–419. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jenkins H. A business opportunity model of corporate social responsibility for small- and medium-sized enterprises. Bus Ethics: Eur Rev. 2009;18(1):21–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jamali D, Zanhour M, Keshishian T. Peculiar strengths and relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR. J Bus Ethics. 2009;87(3):355–377. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.DiBella J, Forrest N, Burch S, Rao‐Williams J, Ninomiya SM, Hermelingmeier V, et al. Exploring the potential of SMEs to build individual, organizational, and community resilience through sustainability-oriented business practices. Bus Strateg Environ. 2023;32(1):721–735. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bressan A, Pedrini M. Exploring sustainable-oriented innovation within micro and small tourism firms. Tourism Plann Dev. 2020;17(5):497–514. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hoogendoorn B, Guerra D, van der Zwan P. What drives environmental practices of SMEs? Small Bus Econ. 2015;44:759–781. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Johnstone L, Hallberg P. ISO 14001 adoption and environmental performance in small to medium sized enterprises. J Environ Manage. 2020;266:110592. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Khan NR, Haq MA, Ghouri AM, Raziq A, Moiz SM. Adaptation of RFID technology in business supply chain success: empirical findings from a developing country logistic industry. Calitatea. 2017;18(160):93–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hitchens D, Thankappan S, Trainor M, Clausen J, De Marchi B. Environmental performance, competitiveness and management of small businesses in Europe. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie. 2005;96(5):541–557. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Haq MA, Khan NR, Parkash R, Jabeen A. Impact of JIT, waste minimization, and flow management on operational performance of manufacturing companies. Calitatea. 2016;17(153):48–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Polas MRH, Tabash MI, Bhattacharjee A, Dávila GA. Knowledge management practices and green innovation in SMEs: The role of environmental awareness towards environmental sustainability. Int J Organ Anal. 2023;31(5):1601–1622. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hillary R. Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. J Clean Prod. 2004;12:561–569. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jayaraman V, Singh R, Anandnarayan A. Impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on consumer perception and revenue growth: an emerging economy perspective. Int J Prod Res. 2012;50(5):1395–1410. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gadenne DL, Kennedy J, McKeiver C. An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs. J Bus Ethics. 2009;84:45–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Nazir MA, Khan RS, Khan MR. Identifying prosperity characteristics in small and medium-sized enterprises of Pakistan: Firm, strategy and characteristics of entrepreneurs. J Asia Bus Stud. 2023. Ahead-of-print. doi: 10.1108/JABS-09-2022-0309 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Higginbottom GM. Sampling issues in qualitative research. Nurse Res. 2004;12:7–19. doi: 10.7748/nr2004.07.12.1.7.c5927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. Research Methods for Business Students (Fifth Ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kuzel. Sampling in qualitative research. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research, (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999. p. 33–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tutar H, Şahin M, Sarkhanov T. Problem areas of determining the sample size in qualitative research: a model proposal. Qual Res J. 2023. Ahead of print. doi: 10.1108/QRJ-06-2023-0099 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Creswell JW, Hanson WE, Clark Plano VL, Morales A. Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist. 2007;35(2):236–264. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Muhammad N. Environment and sustainable development in Bangladesh: A legal study in the context of international trends. Int J Law Manag. 2011;53(2):89–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Razzak MR. Mediating effect of productivity between sustainable supply chain management practices and competitive advantage: Evidence from apparel manufacturing in Bangladesh. Manag Environ Qual Int J. 2023;34(2):428–445. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wazir S, Baloch MA. Poverty alleviation through home-based cottage industries in Quetta Balochistan. New Horizons. 2019;13(2):113–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lamoureux SM, Movassaghi H, Kasiri N. The role of government support in SMEs’ adoption of sustainability. IEEE Eng Manag Rev. 2019;47(1):110–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ullah R, Ahmad H, Rehman FU, Fawad A. Green innovation and Sustainable Development Goals in SMEs: The moderating role of government incentives. J Econ Admin Sci. 2021. doi: 10.1108/JEAS-07-2021-0122 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Malesios C, De D, Moursellas A, Dey PK, Evangelinos K. Sustainability performance analysis of small and medium-sized enterprises: Criteria, methods and framework. Socioecon Plann Sci. 2021;75:100993. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100993 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Venkatesh VG, Luthra S. Role of sustainable procurement in sustainable manufacturing operations: an Indian insight. In: Strategic Management of Sustainable Manufacturing Operations. IGI Global; 2016. p. 132–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Dey PK, Malesios C, De D, Chowdhury S, Abdelaziz FB. The impact of lean management practices and sustainably‐oriented innovation on sustainability performance of small and medium‐sized enterprises: Empirical evidence from the UK. Br J Manag. 2020;31(1):141–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Noja GG, Cristea M, Jurcut CN, Buglea A, Lala Popa I. Management financial incentives and firm performance in a sustainable development framework: Empirical evidence from European companies. Sustainability. 2020;12(18):7247. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Parboteeah KP, Hoegl M, Cullen JB. Ethics and religion: An empirical test of a multidimensional model. J Bus Ethics. 2008;80:387–398. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Beekun RI, Badawi JA. Balancing ethical responsibility among multiple organizational stakeholders: The Islamic perspective. J Bus Ethics. 2005;60:131–145. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Agnieszka Konys

5 Dec 2023

PONE-D-23-22784Unlocking the Barriers: Exploring the Impediments to Environmental Sustainability in Developing Country SMEsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Khan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Please carefully check the reviewers' comments and make necessary improvements to the manuscript. The reviews provide valuable insights into areas that require attention. 

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 19 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Agnieszka Konys, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. You indicated that ethical approval was not necessary for your study. We understand that the framework for ethical oversight requirements for studies of this type may differ depending on the setting and we would appreciate some further clarification regarding your research. Could you please provide further details on why your study is exempt from the need for approval and confirmation from your institutional review board or research ethics committee (e.g., in the form of a letter or email correspondence) that ethics review was not necessary for this study? Please include a copy of the correspondence as an ""Other"" file.

3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

4. Please ensure that you include a title page within your main document. You should list all authors and all affiliations as per our author instructions and clearly indicate the corresponding author.

5. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well. 

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The paper is well-written and provides a clear and concise overview of the study. It is well-organized and easy to read, and it effectively highlights the key findings and contributions of the research. However the paper is written in a report format. The following revisions should be made:

1. Add a flowchart/diagram representing the process study made.

2. Supporting results in form of tabular data/graphs can be added.

3. In the findings section, consider providing more specific examples or details to support the key findings.

4. In the practical/implications section, consider discussing the specific implications of the research for SME owners/managers, customers, and government policymakers.

Reviewer #2: Dear authors,

Thank you for the opportunity to review this very interesting piece. While I believe your work is worth publishing, there are several issues that I would like to address prior to this.

First Extensive editing of the English language and style is required.

The title is confusing Please re-write.

Abstract

Please concise abstract of the study.

Introduction

- Set the stage for context, and history, and summarize what you’re going to do. Leave the reader with some impression as to the importance of the topic.

- There are many writing errors such as“ (Even though the research on environmental sustainability is growing, there is gap in how SMEs can achieve environmental sustainability especially in context of recourse constraint developing country.”) What is this? Where is in/of?

- Why there is a need to explore the barriers and limitations of a developing country? There should be a strong background please pay attention to this part.

Literature review

- You used too many headings. Please read some articles to get a paper writing idea.

- The literature review in the study should be like a logical story that tells the readers about the gap that you intend to fill. What does the existing literature tell us? What do we know and don't know based on literature?

Methods and Results

- In the data collection you do not need to add the aim of the study: (The present study aimed to investigate the barriers to sustainable practices adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Balochistan, Pakistan.) You should discuss this in the introduction.

- I appreciate the results description, but again in the results, there are too many headings. I suggest you read some papers to follow the structure.

Discussion and Conclusion

- The discussion must be rewritten considering the findings. The author should have a higher deepness in the discussion, making the linkage to the results of other papers and the theory.

- Overall manuscript has replication please avoid it when revising.

- Spell out the full term at its first mention, indicate its abbreviation in parenthesis, and use the abbreviation from then on. Such as Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs).

Reviewer #3: The topic is important and timely. The methodology is unique as well but need further improvement in all sections to meet the standard of quality publication.

1) Abstract is comprehensive.

2) “SMEs can play a significant role in promoting environmental sustainability,”..provide justification that why SMEs are deserving priority over large firms?

3) In the literature review researcher highlighted the internal and external factors nicely however I believe there are more external factors can be incorporated apart from stakeholder’s aspects such as community/societal influence, buyers pressure, market dynamics and so on. Internal barriers part also can be enhanced. I highly encourage author (s) to read this paper to improve these lacking.

-Hossain, M. I., Ong, T. S., Tabash, M. I., Siow, M. L., & Said, R. M. (2022). Systematic literature review and future research directions: drivers of environmental sustainability practices in small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 14(3), 269-293.

4) Why the scope chosen only Balochistan? Justify. And importance of the research on Baluchistan needs to incorporate in introduction section, why it’s so crucial and urgent.

5) “due to the sensitive nature of the topic and the underdeveloped environment in Balochistan, the sample size was limited to 30 SMEs.”…these are not well convincing reason …how about the saturation point, did that met and how you ensure that no need further data collection?

6) Provide definition of SMEs in your context in methodology section.

7) 4-star hotel is this a SME? Confirm. That’s why you need to mention the criteria of choosing SMEs.

8) Mention the question asked in the interview.

9) The quotation from informants needs to add (not all quotation and no need full only key statements) where suitable otherwise it shows only researchers opinion.

10) Better to have a graphical overview/ model of nodes/codes and emerged themes.

11) “Awareness and attitude of the company owners and managers play a critical role in determining the level of engagement in environmentally sustainable practices.” Suggest how to enhance the level of engagement.

12) Managerial implication need to be aligned with the findings of the study rather than just mention generic statements.

13) Conclusion section needs to be more streamed and concise.

14) Pls consult with professional proof-reader to improve the language quality.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-23-22784.docx

pone.0298580.s002.docx (16.4KB, docx)
PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0298580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298580.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


22 Jan 2024

RESPONSE SHEET

Manuscript ID: PONE-D-23-22784.R1

Dear Editor,

We would like to thank you for considering our manuscript submitted to PLOS ONE Journal for possible publication and providing us an opportunity to revise and resubmit our manuscript based on the reviewers’ comments. We appreciate and acknowledge the inputs offered by reviewers that have helped us to improve the presentation and quality of the manuscript.

In the report below we have described the actions we have taken in response to each query raised by reviewers. We hope that you will find the changes we have made to be sufficient for acceptance of the paper.

With regards,

On-behalf of all the co-authors

Action Taken Report

Dear Reviewers,

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to you for devoting your quality time spent on reviewing our manuscript and offering us detailed inputs which have been extremely helpful in shaping our manuscript.

We hope you will appreciate our sincere efforts in revising the manuscript. Below, we present our responses and actions in tabulated form.

Editor Comments Author's Response

1 Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Thank you. We have followed the formatting guidelines of PLOS ONE.

2 You indicated that ethical approval was not necessary for your study. We understand that the framework for ethical oversight requirements for studies of this type may differ depending on the setting and we would appreciate some further clarification regarding your research. Could you please provide further details on why your study is exempt from the need for approval and confirmation from your institutional review board or research ethics committee (e.g., in the form of a letter or email correspondence) that ethics review was not necessary for this study? Please include a copy of the correspondence as an ""Other"" file.

Thank you for your comment. This study is quantitative, the authors conducted interviews with managers and owners of SMEs to explore their awareness and attitudes toward sustainability practices in business. Furthermore, the study did not involve physical testing or direct contact with respondents. Consequently, there is no possibility of harm—whether mental or physical—to the participants. This absence of risk enables the authors to conduct the study without implementing any precautionary protocols, distinguishing it from qualitative studies in medical research.

Further, we have provided an official letter from the review board stating that no ethical approval was required for this research paper.

3 In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

Thank you. We have uploaded data set underlying the results of this study.

4 Please ensure that you include a title page within your main document. You should list all authors and all affiliations as per our author instructions and clearly indicate the corresponding author.

Thank you. We have uploaded the title page as per author's instructions.

5 Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

Thank you. We have included a statement indicating that ethical approval was waived by the Institutional Review Board, as shown below:

Page 6, Lines 35-38

This research adhered to ethical guidelines, securing respondent consent prior to interviews. Additionally, the authors sought ethical approval from the institutional review board (IRB). However, the IRB returned the application with the recommendation that no ethical review is necessary for this research study.

Reviewer 1 Comment Author's Response

1 The paper is well-written and provides a clear and concise overview of the study. It is well-organized and easy to read, and it effectively highlights the key findings and contributions of the research. However the paper is written in a report format.

Thank you for your comment. We have followed your instructions to improve our article.

2 Add a flowchart/diagram representing the process study made.

Thank you. We have included a figure representing the flow of the research process on page 7, shown in figure 2.

3 Supporting results in form of tabular data/graphs can be added.

Thank you for your comment. We have incorporated the results in tabular form on pages 9 and 10, in Tables 2 and 3.

4 In the findings section, consider providing more specific examples or details to support the key findings.

Thank you for your comment. We have provided specific examples in support of our findings.

5 In the practical/implications section, consider discussing the specific implications of the research for SME owners/managers, customers, and government policymakers.

Thank you for your comments. We have improved the research implications on page 19, lines 19-41.

Page 19 Lines 19-41.

The study provides significant implications for SMEs owners, managers, government, and environmental agencies. First, it is utmost important for both owners and workers to have access to education regarding environmental initiatives and their advantages. Closing the knowledge gap through workshops and training programs is essential, not only for aware SMEs but also to make them stick to eco-friendly protocols. Additionally, government agencies and environmental NGOs should advocate for increased government support and incentives as financial limitations pose a barrier. Second, SMEs should view ISO certification not as a requirement but also as a strategic tool that provides an advantage in accessing international markets. SMEs should engage with customers to raise awareness about the benefits of eco-friendly practices, which can help address customers’ concerns about increased prices. Third, SMEs should position themselves as environmentally friendly organizations that open opportunities for financial support mechanisms such as environmental initiative grants and loans. Fourth, managers should develop CSR strategies that align with SMEs priorities, which create shared value and enhance reputation. Fifth, managers should collaborate with other environmental agencies and establish networks with NGOs and governmental agencies to amplify the impact of sustainability initiatives. Managers should also explore the opportunities for adaptation of climate friendly technologies and processes. Sixth, government agencies should take initiatives to foster a mindset among SMEs owners by emphasizing how sustainability aligns with long term profitability. Finally, government agencies should develop policies to monitor and evaluate environmental initiatives and performance of SMEs, which ensures improvement and adaptation to environmental initiatives. These research implications contribute to long term success and sustainable development of SMEs.

Reviewer 2 Comment Author's Response

1 Thank you for the opportunity to review this very interesting piece. While I believe your work is worth publishing, there are several issues that I would like to address prior to this.

Thank you for your comments. We have improved the article following your instructions.

2 First Extensive editing of the English language and style is required.

Thank you for your comment. We have proofread our article.

3 The title is confusing. Please re-write.

Thank you for your comment. We have changed the title as follows:

Barriers to adaptation of environmental sustainability in SMEs: A qualitative study

4 Abstract: Please concise abstract of the study.

Thank you for your comment. We have improved the abstract of the study, as given below:

Abstract

This study examines the antecedents of environmental sustainability in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of a developing country and explores the specific internal and external factors for environmental sustainability. The study focused on SMEs in Balochistan, Pakistan, utilizing convenience and purposive sampling techniques to select a sample size of 30 SMEs. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire. The results of the study revealed that lack of finance and education are major barriers to recognizing and addressing environmental sustainability issues, along with the lack of government support and regulations to ensure compliance with environmental safety laws, hence leading to low concern for sustainability practices among SMEs. Awareness and attitude of SME owners/managers, along with customer demand and government policies, influence the adoption of environmental sustainability practices. Overcoming financial constraints and promoting cooperation among stakeholders are key to fostering sustainable practices in SMEs. This research makes an important contribution to the sustainable management literature by providing new and in-depth insights into the barriers that impede environmental sustainability in SMEs of developing countries.

5 Introduction

- Set the stage for context, and history, and summarize what you’re going to do. Leave the reader with some impression as to the importance of the topic.

- There are many writing errors such as “Even though the research on environmental sustainability is growing, there is gap in how SMEs can achieve environmental sustainability especially in context of recourse constraint developing country.” What is this? Where is in/of?

- Why there is a need to explore the barriers and limitations of a developing country? There should be a strong background please pay attention to this part.

Thank you for your comments. We have improved the introduction by following your suggestions.

Page 1, Lines 30-36

SMEs have not received significant attention in the ongoing global discussion about sustainable development [4, 5]. It is evident that large organizations impact environment. It is also crucial to recognize the role of SMEs as well. SMEs impact on environment become clearer when we consider their collective impacts. Globally, over 95% of businesses are SMEs [6]. Although each SME may have little impact, the cumulative effect of SMEs can be substantial due to their large number [4]. It is often mentioned that SMEs are responsible for major pollution [7].

Page 1, Lines 40-45; Page 2, Lines 1-7

Researchers have been supporting the adaptation of sustainability practices [11, 3]. However, literature has not adequately addressed the sustainability issues faced by SMEs in developing countries as it has with developed ones [12]. This situation has been widely acknowledged in the literature [4, 5]. Wang et al. [10] shed light on the importance of sustainability initiatives in developing countries and the unique barriers and motivational factors. Similarly, Jabbour et al., [4] emphasized the significance of sustainability in developing countries and the need to study strategies for achieving sustainable practices. Additionally, Purwandani & Michaud [13] recognized the necessity to delve into sustainability matters within SMEs as it impacts business performance and presents new market opportunities.

Page 2, Lines 14-27

In this study we address the gap by exploring the internal and external factors that contribute to achieve the environmental sustainability in SMEs of Pakistan. The present study recognizes the existence of environmental alerts in Pakistan, particularly in Balochistan that comprise great environmental concern and weak governance [15, 16, 17]. Hence, this research significantly contributes to the discipline of sustainability. Further, the research framework of this study encompasses environmental orientation, responsible environmental management, and eco-friendly practices, which are grounded on strategic competencies such as pollution prevention, product stewardship, and sustainable development of natural resource-based view (NRBV) theory [18, 19]. Therefore, this study provides comprehensive understanding of internal and external dimensions of SMEs that need to be nurtured to improve environmental sustainability. While extending the previous research Baah et al. [18], this research provides new insight for top management, policymakers, governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) for achieving environmental performance in SMEs of developing countries.

6 Literature review

- You used too many headings. Please read some articles to get a paper writing idea.

- The literature review in the study should be like a logical story that tells the readers about the gap that you intend to fill. What does the existing literature tell us? What do we know and don't know based on literature?

Thank you for your comment. We have rewritten the literature review and incorporated your instructions on page 2, lines 44-47; page 3, lines 1-50; page 4, lines 1-21; page 5, lines 1-45; page 6, lines 1-27.

Page 2, Lines 44-47; Page 3, Lines 1-50; Page 4, Lines 1-21; Page 5, Lines 1-45; Page 6, Lines 1-27

SMEs prioritize survival and cost reduction that may not align with environmental sustainability [25]. The relationship between environmental sustainability and economic outcomes is complex and influenced by multiple factors. However, engaging in environmentally efficient practices can lead to long-term benefits and increased revenue through recycling, reuse and reduce [26]. Hence, it raised question whether eco-efficiency could increase profits for SMEs [27]. Researchers suggest that adaptation of sustainable practices and ecological partnerships can lead to financial success for SMEs [28]. Moreover, Hossain et al. [29] conducted a systematic literature review of articles published during 2009–2020 and identified 87 drivers of environmental sustainability and categorized them under internal and external dimensions. Researchers suggested that SMEs should focus on internal and external factors for implementation of sustainable practices. Hence, researchers identified internal and external barriers suitable to the context of this study. Table 1 summarizes the barriers and opportunities for SMEs.

In reality, adopting sustainability requires resources, however, SMEs already facing several challenges [30]. On the other side, SMEs strive to gain flexibility and adaptabil

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers PONE-D-23-22784.R1.docx

pone.0298580.s003.docx (907.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Agnieszka Konys

29 Jan 2024

Barriers to Adaptation of Environmental Sustainability in SMEs: A Qualitative Study

PONE-D-23-22784R1

Dear Dr. Khan,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Agnieszka Konys, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Agnieszka Konys

29 Apr 2024

PONE-D-23-22784R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Khan,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Agnieszka Konys

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data set

    (XLSX)

    pone.0298580.s001.xlsx (28.1KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-23-22784.docx

    pone.0298580.s002.docx (16.4KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers PONE-D-23-22784.R1.docx

    pone.0298580.s003.docx (907.5KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES