Skip to main content
. 2024 May 16;10:55. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00724-6

Table 2.

Results of the AMSTAR 2 methodological quality evaluation of the included meta-analysis

AMSTAR 2 items % OC
Review 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Costello et al. [30] 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 90.63 High
Bleakley et al. [28] 1 0.5 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 78.13 High
Amiri et al. [26] 0 1 0 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 78.13 High
McCartney et al. [37] 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1 0 0.5 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 71.88 Moderate
Alcantara et al. [25] 1 1 0 0.5 1 1 0 0.5 1 0 N/A N/A 1 1 N/A 1 69.23 Moderate
Hendricks et al. [32] 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 0 0.5 1 0 N/A N/A 0 1 N/A 1 69.23 Moderate
Kloby Nielsen et al. [33] 1 0 0 0.5 1 1 0 0.5 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 68.75 Moderate
Brown et al. [29] 1 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 56.25 Moderate
Lakićević [34] 1 0 0 0.5 1 1 0 0.5 1 0 N/A N/A 1 0 N/A 1 53.85 Moderate
Ranchordas et al. [44] 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 53.13 Moderate
Loureiro et al. [35] 1 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 N/A 1 50.00 Moderate
Malta et al. [36] 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 50.00 Moderate
Moore et al. [38] 1 1 0 0.5 1 1 0 0.5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 50.00 Moderate
Suhett et al. [45] 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 0 0 0.5 1 0 N/A N/A 1 0 N/A 1 50.00 Moderate
Murray and Cardinale [40] 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 46.88 Low
Ammar et al. [27] 1 0 0 0.5 1 1 0 0.5 1 0 N/A N/A 0 0 N/A 1 46.15 Low
Ortiz et al. [41] 1 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 0.5 1 0 N/A N/A 1 0 N/A 1 46.15 Low
Davis et al. [31] 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 40.63 Low
Poppendieck et al. [43] 1 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 40.63 Low
Poppendieck et al. [42] 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 31.25 Low
Mota et al. [39] 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.5 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 N/A 1 26.92 Low
Engel et al. [24] 1 0 0 0.5 0 1 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 25.00 Low
Born et al. [23] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 18.75 Critically low

N/A, not applicable; OC, overall confidence