Abstract
We have developed a procedure to directly clone large fragments from the genome of the soil bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti. Specific regions to be cloned are first flanked by parallel copies of an origin of transfer (oriT) together with a plasmid replication origin capable of replicating large clones in Escherichia coli but not in the target organism. Supplying transfer genes in trans specifically transfers the oriT-flanked region, and in this process, site-specific recombination at the oriT sites results in a plasmid carrying the flanked region of interest that can replicate in E. coli from the inserted origin of replication (in this case, the F origin carried on a BAC cloning vector). We have used this procedure with the oriT of the plasmid RK2 to clone contiguous fragments of 50, 60, 115, 140, 240, and 200 kb from the S. meliloti pExo megaplasmid. Analysis of the 60-kb fragment allowed us to identify a 9-kb region capable of autonomous replication in the bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The nucleotide sequence of this fragment revealed a replicator region including homologs of the repA, repB, and repC genes from other Rhizobiaceae, which encode proteins involved in replication and segregation of plasmids in many organisms.
With the rapid increase in the number of completed microbial genome sequences, we are entering an era in which interests in the manipulation and functional characterization of whole genomes are flourishing. Methods and techniques involved in the manipulation of large regions of genomes will increasingly become valuable tools (for example, in the generation of mosaic organisms with various catabolic and biosynthetic capabilities). Here we describe a new procedure to clone large (>100-kb) defined regions from the genome of the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti.
S. meliloti is a free-living gram-negative soil bacterium whose symbiotic interaction with alfalfa results in the formation of nitrogen-fixing root nodules. The genome of S. meliloti strain SU47 consists of three large replicons, the largest of which is 3,500 kb in size and appears to be similar to a conventional bacterial chromosome (4, 28, 36). The two other replicons are referred to as megaplasmids (47). One is 1,350 kb in size and, because it carries nodulation and nitrogen fixation genes required for symbiosis, is referred to as pSym (5, 33, 46); the other is 1,700 kb and is designated pExo since it carries two large gene clusters required for the synthesis of exopolysaccharides (alternate designations include pRmeSU47b and pSymb [4, 13, 22, 30, 33]).
In previous work, we constructed a genetic map of the pExo megaplasmid which consists of sequential Tn5-derivative transposon insertions linked to each other in transduction (16). Strains carrying pExo megaplasmid deletions between defined insertions were isolated, and a phenotypic analysis of these strains allowed us to identify several loci involved in utilization of the carbon sources dulcitol, β-hydroxybutyrate, lactose, rhamnose, and protocatechuate (17). Other known genes located on the plasmid include those involved in thiamine biosynthesis, purine and glycerol metabolism, dicarboxylate transport, and phosphate transport and fix genes (sbmA) (3, 6, 23, 27, 58). We estimate that the genes for all of the known phenotypes associated with pExo could be accommodated within a 70-kb region; hence, the biological role of over 95% of the megaplasmid remains to be established.
To gain further insight into the biology of pExo, we wished to identify genes on this megaplasmid using a nucleotide sequencing approach, and as part of that work, we developed a procedure to clone defined regions from microbial genomes. With this approach, we identified and partially characterized a region which appears to be the pExo megaplasmid origin of replication. The procedure is based on site-specific recombination which occurs at the origin of transfer (oriT) of conjugative plasmids (7, 11, 26, 38, 42, 57, 60). While such recombination is well documented, to our knowledge, it has not previously been applied for the manipulation of microbial or other genomes. Here we describe the development of the directed cloning procedure and its application, and we briefly discuss its advantages and limitations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, plasmids, transposons, and genetic manipulations.
The S. meliloti strains, transposons, growth media, antibiotic concentrations, and general methods for conjugation and transduction used in this work were as previously described (17, 21). S. meliloti and Agrobacterium tumefaciens GMI9023 (48) cells were incubated at 30°C, while Escherichia coli cells were incubated at 30 or 37°C. The integration plasmids were mobilized via the oriT from E. coli into S. meliloti by supplying the RK2 transfer genes in trans on the mobilizing plasmid pRK2013 (20) or pRK600 (22).
The S. meliloti oriT-flanked regions were captured in E. coli JW192 (DH5α with trfA278D integrated in the chromosome, Apr) (59) following overnight triparental matings (with donor, helper, and recipient bacterial strains) made up of the S. meliloti double-integrant donor strain, E. coli DH5α carrying the mobilizing plasmid pRK2013 (Kmr), and the E. coli DH5α (trfA) recipient. Transconjugants were selected at 37°C on Luria-Bertani agar containing ampicillin (100 μg/ml) and spectinomycin (20 μg/ml) or ampicillin and chloramphenicol (10 μg/ml). Following purification, transconjugants were screened for loss of pRK2013-encoded Kmr prior to the preparation of plasmid DNA.
DNA methodology.
Plasmid DNA was purified with the alkaline lysis method as described by Birnboim and Doly (10). Plasmid DNA from 60- to 240-kb BAC clones was purified from 2-liter cultures by alkaline lysis followed by CsCl density gradient centrifugation, yielding 50 to 250 μg, depending on the plasmid. DNA manipulations and PCRs were done according to manufacturer recommendations. Following preparation and digestion-modification, DNA samples were electrophoresed through 0.8 to 2% agarose gels in TAE (18) buffer.
Construction of integration plasmids.
The various DNA fragments used in the construction of pTH455 (Fig. 1) were obtained as follows: a 760-bp EcoRI/SalI fragment containing the oriT site of RK2 was isolated from pTJS82 (50); the oriV(RK2) was a 900-bp BamHI fragment from plasmid pMS107-GENO14 (59); a 334-bp IS50 PCR product, which included bp 20 to 314 starting from the outside end of the IS50, as well as sites for I-SceI (underlined), SpeI, and XbaI (italicized) restriction endonucleases, was synthesized by PCR using synthetic primers AB10170 (IS50 nucleotides 20 to 42; 5′-GCTCTAGAAGCGTCCTGAACGGAACCTTTCC-3′) and AB10171 (IS50 nucleotides 292 to 314; 5′-GGACTAGTTACGCTAGGGATAACAGGGTAATTGATCGCCTCGGCAGAAACGTTG-3′) (the orientation of the PCR fragment was confirmed by DNA sequencing); and the ΩSp cassette was a 2.0-kb XmaI fragment from pHP45Ω (44). First an oriV-ΩSp cassette (2.9 kb) was made and cloned as an EcoRI/SpeI fragment next to the oriT fragment in pBluescriptII (1) to give pTH444. The resulting oriV-ΩSp-oriT cassette was then excised as a SalI/SpeI fragment and joined to both orientations of the PCR-amplified IS50 fragment, producing the plasmids pTH455 (Fig. 1) and pTH456. These differ from one another only in the directionality of the PCR fragment.
FIG. 1.
Illustration of integration plasmids pTH455 and pTH509. The IS50-oriV-ΩSp-oriT integration cassettes in the two plasmid backbones (pBluescript and pBACe3.6) differ in the orientation of the IS50 fragment. The IS50 is shaded white (outside end) to black (inside end). All indicated restriction sites are unique except for the SmaI and SacI sites indicated in pTH509. E, EcoRI; I, I-SceI; K, KpnI; Sc, SacI; SI, SalI; Sm, SmaI; Sp, SpeI.
Plasmids pTH509 (single cassette) (Fig. 1) and pTH504 (duplicated cassette) (Fig. 2) were made by cloning the IS50-oriV-ΩSp-oriT cassette from pTH456 as a 4-kb SacI fragment into SacI-digested pBACe3.6 (25).
FIG. 2.
Schematic representation of predicted oriT-directed transfer events during conjugation from E. coli(pTH504) to either E. coli (trfA) or S. meliloti. Transfer is initiated by nicking at the oriT nic site and occurs 5′ to 3′. The 5′ end is thought to remain covalently attached at the cell membrane and is then ligated to the 3′ end of an identical nic site (31, 41, 51). Two such nicking-ligation events can occur in pTH504, resulting in the transfer of two distinct regions (the two types of dashed lines) originating from either oriT site. Rescue of the IS50-oriV-ΩSp-oriT cassette plasmid (pTH582) via IS50-directed recombination in S. meliloti at Ω5069::Tn5-132 is also shown.
Determination of cointegrate orientation.
The 296 bp of IS50 directed the integration plasmids via single-crossover homologous recombination to one of the two IS50 elements (either the left or right IS50 element) of the target Tn5 derivatives. To distinguish the two types of cointegrates, we employed Southern blotting and PCR (Fig. 3) procedures. In the case of Southern blotting, genomic DNA from pTH509 cointegrates was digested with SmaI and probed with the mini-F plasmid pMF21 (34). Different-sized border fragments are observed for the two cointegrates. For the PCR procedure, primers specific to the integration vector and to the Tn5 insertion derivative were used. For pTH455, the integration vector primer (5′-ATGTGCTGCAAGGCGATTAAGTTGGGTAAC-3′) combined with either of two primers (5′-TGTTGTGCCCAGTCATAGCCGAATAGCC-3′ or 5′-GCGTGTCTTGGGAGATTGGACGACAGC-3′) specific for opposite strands of the central region of Tn5 were used (Fig. 3). For pTH509, the integration vector primer (5′-TTCTCGAACCCTCCCGGCCCGCTAACG-3′) was used with either of two primers (5′-TTTCTAAGGCAGACCAACCATTTGTTAAATCAG-3′ or 5′-TTCAGTGATCCATTGCTGTTGACAAAGGGAATC-3′) specific for opposite strands of the central region of Tn5-132. These primer pairs generated unique products depending on whether integration occurred at the right or left IS50 (Fig. 3).
FIG. 3.
Schematic representation of the two possible cointegrate structures (structures 1 and 2) between the integration plasmid pTH455 and a Tn5 transposon, and an agarose gel demonstrating both integration events as determined by PCR. Homologous recombination of pTH455 can occur at either of the two IS50 sequences, IS50R (structure 1) or IS50L (structure 2). The PCR primers (a, b, and c) are indicated by half arrows. The dashed line represents pExo DNA. Genomic DNA preparations of four integrants (I to IV) were used for PCR with primer sets a-b and b-c. Sample III carries pTH455 in IS50L, whereas the other three samples carry pTH455 in IS50R. Determination of pTH509 integration into both IS50 elements of Tn5-132 transposons is accomplished in a similar fashion with different primer sets. L, DNA ladder; pBS, pBluescript.
Generation of plasmid pTH515.
The oriT cassette plasmid, pTH582, was rescued in S. meliloti via IS50-directed cointegrate formation following the transfer of pTH504 into S. meliloti carrying Ω5069::Tn5-132 (Fig. 2, lower half). Spr Cms transconjugants were recovered, and PCR analysis of these strains showed that they carried pTH582 integrated at either of the IS50 elements of the Tn5-132. Double-cointegrate strains carrying the four combinations of Ω5069::Tn5-132::pTH582 and Ω5056::Tn5::pTH455 were then constructed by transduction (strains RmK188 to RmK191). The 60-kb region flanked by Ω5056 and Ω5069 was rescued from two of these double-cointegrate strains (RmK189 and RmK190) by selecting for Spr transfer into E. coli DH5α (trfA). Transconjugants from the RmK189 donor were Kmr and Tcr, while RmK192 generated Kms and Tcs transconjugants. These results are consistent with oriT-directed recombination from the outer (RmK189) and inner (RmK190) IS50 elements, respectively, of the two transposon insertions. The predicted structure of the Kms Tcs RmK190 transconjugant plasmids is such that they should contain only the 60-kb Ω5056- and Ω5069-flanked region and the oriV-FRT cassette from the integration plasmids; one such plasmid was retained and designated pTH515.
Sequence analysis.
The ClustalW program (55) was used to align nucleotide and amino acid sequences. All GenBank searches to compare nucleotide sequences against those in databases at the National Center for Biotechnology Information were accomplished using BLAST 2.0 programs (2).
RESULTS
Cloning strategy.
We have developed a procedure to clone DNA fragments whose boundaries are specifically defined by two oriT sites in parallel orientation. In the case of the work described below, we have inserted oriT sites at specific Tn5 and Tn5-132 insertions whose map locations were previously determined. These Tn5 derivative insertions contain a central antibiotic resistance gene region flanked by inverted 1.5-kb IS50 insertion elements. Tn5 encodes neomycin and kanamycin resistance (Nmr Kmr), while Tn5-132 encodes tetracycline and oxytetracycline resistance (Tcr Otr), and strains carrying two such differentially marked insertions are readily constructed by transduction (21). The oriT-flanked target regions are captured via oriT-directed recombination concomitant with their transfer to E. coli. Replication of the resulting closed circular DNA molecule in E. coli is directed from an origin of replication which was inserted along with oriT.
Integration vectors.
To carry out the in vivo cloning procedure, we constructed integration cassettes (IS50-oriV-ΩSp-oriT) containing (i) 296 bp of the IS50 elements of Tn5, (ii) the origin of replication (oriV) from plasmid RK2, (iii) a gene encoding spectinomycin resistance (in the ΩSp) for selection in S. meliloti, and (iv) the origin of transfer (oriT) from plasmid RK2. The IS50 fragment directed the integration plasmid via single-crossover homologous recombination to one of the two IS50 elements of the target Tn5 derivatives. To obtain strains carrying two parallel IS50-oriV-ΩSp-oriT cassettes at the inner IS50 elements flanking the region of interest, it was necessary to make two integration cassettes which differ from each other only in the orientation of the IS50 PCR fragment. One cassette (pTH455) was present in the pBluescriptII vector, while the other (pTH509) was in the chloramphenicol-resistant (Cmr) pBACe3.6 vector, which replicates from the F plasmid origin of replication and allows recovery of large DNA fragments in E. coli (Fig. 1).
Demonstration of oriT-directed site-specific recombination.
To demonstrate that the oriT employed in our experiments could act as a site for specific recombination during conjugal transfer, we constructed another plasmid, pTH504, carrying a duplication of the IS50-oriV-ΩSp-oriT cassette of pTH509 (Fig. 2). Conjugal transfer and joining at the oriT sites of pTH504 should generate two plasmids (as outlined in Fig. 2): one identical in structure to pTH509 (Fig. 1) and the other composed of only the IS50-oriV-ΩSp-oriT cassette (pTH582 in Fig. 2). Unlike the Cmr Spr plasmid pTH509, pTH582 encodes only Spr and requires TrfA for replication (at the oriV of RK2) in E. coli.
Plasmid pTH504 was conjugated from the recombination-deficient (recA) E. coli strain S17-1, which carries an RK2 derivative integrated into the chromosome and efficiently mobilizes plasmids carrying the RK2 oriT (52), into the recipient E. coli DH5α (recA trfA+), which produces sufficient TrfA protein to efficiently initiate replication of plasmids carrying the RK2 oriV (59). Examination of the plasmid DNA from Spr transconjugants revealed that 90% had two plasmids, one of which was the same size as pTH509 while the other was identical to the IS50-oriV-ΩSp-oriT circularized cassette plasmid (pTH582). Seven percent of the transconjugants carried pTH582 alone, 3% carried pTH509 alone, and none of the transconjugants examined contained a plasmid of the same size as pTH504 (data not shown). As a control, when plasmid DNA prepared from the S17-1 pTH504 donor strain was used to transform Spr into the DH5α trfA recipient, all of the transformants carried plasmids with the same structure as the pTH504 donor plasmid (24 transformants were examined). These results are consistent with oriT acting as a site for specific recombination during conjugation.
oriT-directed recombination in S. meliloti.
To test for oriT-directed recombination in S. meliloti and establish that the oriT-flanked region can be cloned by conjugation, it was necessary to first introduce oriT at two different positions in pExo. In initial experiments, one oriT was presented in the form of Ω5111::Tn5-oriT, while the second was obtained via pTH504 (described above) integration at Ω5142::Tn5-132. Tn5-oriT is a transposon in which a 760-bp oriT-containing fragment from RK2 was cloned into the central BamHI restriction site of Tn5 (62). We had previously constructed strains carrying the Tn5-oriT transposon in both possible orientations at the insertion site Ω5111 (17). These two insertions were transduced (selecting for Nmr) into each of two strains in which pTH509 was integrated at the IS50L and IS50R of the insertion Ω5142::Tn5-132, located 140 kb clockwise from Ω5111 on the pExo genetic map (Fig. 4). A schematic representation of the pExo region in the resulting four double-integrant strains (carrying two integration vectors) (RmK255 to RmK258) is shown in Fig. 5. Of the four strains, only RmK257 carries the necessary combination of two parallel oriT sites flanking the BAC F origin of replication. Therefore in this strain, oriT-directed recombination upon conjugal transfer should generate a large, 150-kb plasmid carrying the F origin and the Cmr gene from the pBAC backbone of pTH509. The results obtained from triparental matings into E. coli showed that 10 out of 10 Cmr and Spr transconjugant plasmids from the RmK257 donor were very large (ca. 150 kb) and identical as judged from their common restriction fragment patterns. Alternatively, all of the Spr plasmids examined from the three other matings were identical to the pTH509 targeting vector (resulting from pTH509 cointegrate resolution). As the two oriT sites in strain RmK256 are in direct orientation, it will transfer a plasmid similar in size to that obtained from RmK257; however, the resulting plasmid would be Nmr Otr Spr Cms and would not have the BAC oriV (Fig. 5). In the above-described experiments, E. coli Spr transconjugants were obtained at a frequency of 10−6 per donor.
FIG. 4.
Circular map of the pExo megaplasmid illustrating the relative locations of representative Tn5 derivative transposon insertions (Ω). The dashed line represents the region deleted in strain RmF909. The six regions (AA, AC, AD, AE, AF, and AG) which were flanked by the IS50-oriV-ΩSp-oriT cassettes and subsequently transferred to E. coli are indicated. The approximate sizes of the flanked regions are shown.
FIG. 5.
Schematic representation of the four possible combinations of Ω5111::Tn5-oriT with Ω5142::Tn5-132::pTH509 (RmK255 to RmK258). RmK255 and RmK258 carry indirect oriT sites. Although RmK256 and RmK257 both carry direct (parallel) oriT sites, only in RmK257 do the oriT sites flank the chloramphenicol-resistant BAC vector (with the F origin of replication). A more detailed map of pTH509 is shown in Fig. 1. The dashed line represents pExo DNA. Cmr, Nmr, Otr, and Sp refer to chloramphenicol, neomycin, oxytetracycline, and spectinomycin resistance determinants, respectively.
A second experiment was conducted employing strains carrying Ω5079::Tn5-oriT together with pTH509 integrated at either Ω5069::Tn5-132 or dctB12::Tn5-132. The respective intervening regions were rescued in E. coli only when the oriT sites were in parallel and the transferred region carried the F origin. Collectively these data demonstrate that oriT-directed site-specific recombination occurs and that pExo DNA between parallel oriT sites can be efficiently captured in E. coli.
Directed in vivo cloning of large contiguous DNA fragments.
Tn5 derivatives at insertions dctB12, Ω5056, Ω5069, Ω5159, Ω5142, Ω5102, and Ω5205 were targeted with pTH455 and pTH509 integration plasmids (see Fig. 4 for insertion locations). After the orientations of the cointegrates were determined, the desired double-integrant strains were constructed by transduction of Nmr from the Tn5::cointegrate into the Tn5-132 (Otr Nms) cointegrate recipient strains. The megaplasmid regions were captured by selecting for Spr or Cmr transconjugants from triparental matings consisting of the S. meliloti double-integrant donor strain, E. coli DH5α carrying the mobilizing plasmid pRK2013, and the Apr E. coli DH5α (trfA) as a recipient. These experiments were complicated by the fact that resolution of the pTH455 and pTH509 cointegrates via recombination at the IS50 elements also yielded Spr or Cmr transconjugants. However, the latter were readily distinguished by their small size relative to plasmids carrying the megaplasmid regions.
Employing this procedure, six contiguous pExo megaplasmid regions of 50, 60, 140, 115, 240, and 200 kb were rescued as plasmids in E. coli (regions AD, AA, AC, AE, AF, and AG in Fig. 4). Independent transconjugant cultures from the same donor regions generated identical plasmid restriction pattern profiles (data not shown), indicating that plasmid rearrangements were rare. In addition, the total sizes of the restriction fragments were consistent with those predicted for the targeted regions. When Southern blots of restricted total wild-type DNA were probed with the cloned megaplasmid regions, the pattern of the hybridizing fragments corresponded to those present in the cloned DNA (Fig. 6). In contrast, similar blots with DNA from the pExo deletion derivative RmF909 (ΔΩ5085-5047) showed few weakly hybridizing bands, presumably arising from some reiterated sequences. These data suggest that the cloned DNA was from the predicted pExo regions and that the DNA was not rearranged during the cloning process.
FIG. 6.
Southern blots demonstrate that the recovered plasmids in E. coli harbor S. meliloti DNA. Genomic DNA was prepared from wild-type strain Rm1021 and from deletion derivative RmF909. BamHI-restricted genomic DNA was hybridized with labeled pTH544 and pTH564 DNAs as indicated. The Rm1021 hybridization pattern closely resembles the probe pattern, showing that the plasmids carry pExo DNA. Moreover, DNA from RmF909, which lacks pExo DNA between Ω5085 and Ω5047 (Fig. 4), did not hybridize with either probe. BAC plasmid pTH544 carries DNA between Ω5159 and Ω5142 (Cmr Spr Nms), and BAC plasmid pTH564 carries DNA between Ω5142 and Ω5102 (Cmr Spr Nms).
An origin of replication from the pExo megaplasmid.
We have previously demonstrated that the S. meliloti pExo megaplasmid can replicate in A. tumefaciens (22). In the course of our experiments we rescued region AA (Fig. 4) as an Spr plasmid designated pTH515. This plasmid consists of the 60-kb Ω5056- and Ω5069 flanked region, together with the IS50-oriV-ΩSp-oriT-IS50 cassette fragment (see Materials and Methods). Plasmid pTH515 DNA generated Spr transformant colonies only in E. coli strains expressing the RK2 plasmid replication initiation protein TrfA (data not shown). This was expected, since replication of pTH515 should occur from the RK2 oriV present in the ori-ΩSp-oriT cassette fragment. Plasmid pTH515 was readily transferred (frequency of >10−2) from E. coli (trfA) into A. tumefaciens in triparental matings in which pTH515 was mobilized with E. coli carrying the plasmid pRK600 (22), which cannot replicate in A. tumefaciens. Plasmid DNA isolated from the resulting transconjugants was the same size and had the same restriction patterns as the pTH515(AA) donor plasmid DNA (data not shown), suggesting that this DNA was replicating autonomously in the A. tumefaciens cytoplasm.
We have determined the nucleotide sequence of region AA in pTH515 as part of a project to determine the complete nucleotide sequence of the pExo megaplasmid (data not shown). Analysis of the AA sequence revealed the presence of three contiguous genes whose products are homologous to known and predicted plasmid replication proteins RepA, RepB, and RepC from the related microorganisms Agrobacterium rhizogenes (40), Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 (24), A. tumefaciens (53, 54), Rhizobium etli (45), and Rhizobium leguminosarum (56). Moreover, an alignment of the repB-repC intergenic regions from the Agrobacterium and Rhizobium plasmids revealed high levels of similarity between these sequences (Fig. 7). It has been suggested that this highly conserved intergenic sequence may constitute an incompatibility determinant or may harbor the origin of replication (7, 45, 54).
FIG. 7.
Subclones of the replicator region and a multiple alignment of the repB-repC intergenic region nucleotide sequences from large plasmids. Two subclones from the AA region, a 9.1-kb BamHI fragment (with the repABC genes) and a 4.4-kb BamHI/EcoRI fragment (with only the repC gene and repBC intergenic region), were transferred into A. tumefaciens (see text). An alignment of the repBC intergenic regions from several Agrobacterium and Rhizobium plasmid replicator regions is shown: the Ti plasmid (pTiB6S3) of A. tumefaciens B6S3 (51), the Ti plasmid (pTi-SAKURA) of A. tumefaciens MAFF301001 (50), the pExo megaplasmid of S. meliloti SU47 (this study), the Ri plasmid (pRiA4b) of A. rhizogenes (37), the symbiotic plasmid (p42d) of R. etli CFN42 (42), the symbiotic plasmid (pNGR234) of S. meliloti NGR234 (21), and the cryptic plasmid (pRL8JI) of R. leguminosarum (53). Hyphens indicate gaps introduced to give the best sequence alignments. Conserved nucleotide sequences are shaded; nucleotides identical for all seven sequences are indicated with asterisks.
To delineate regions required for replication of the AA region in Agrobacterium, we employed a Gmr pUC19 plasmid derivative, pUC30T, which cannot replicate in this organism (50a). Plasmid pUC30T subclones which carried the repA, repB, and repC genes or repC and part of repB were found to replicate in A. tumefaciens (Fig. 7). A comparison of the stability of the latter subclone versus that of a subclone carrying all three rep genes revealed that following growth for seven generations, 90% of the cells retained the plasmid carrying all three rep genes. Only 20% of the cells retained the partial-repB–repC plasmid, suggesting that the repA and/or repB gene products contribute to plasmid stability.
DISCUSSION
We report a procedure whereby large defined fragments from the S. meliloti genome have been cloned via intramolecular site-specific recombination, directed by the origin of transfer (oriT) of the IncP group plasmid RK2. In principle, the capture of oriT-flanked regions can be applied to any bacteria in which conjugal transfer systems are established. Conjugal plasmid DNA transfer is initiated through the generation of a single-strand nick at the plasmid oriT, and in this process a protein (TraI in the case of RK2) is bound via a phosphodiester linkage to the 5′ end nucleotide. DNA transfer from the nick occurs in a 5′-to-3′ direction, and plasmid transfer terminates with joining of the 5′ and 3′ ends, thus generating a closed circle. The precise biochemical mechanism for the termination of transfer has yet to be resolved; however, genetic studies have demonstrated that oriT acts as a sequence-specific recombination site during the conjugative transfer process (7, 19, 31, 41, 43, 51, 57, 60).
The transfer of oriT-flanked regions as reported in this study has clear analogies to the transfer of T-DNA from A. tumefaciens into plant cells (31, 49, 63). The transferred T-DNA is flanked by 25-bp direct repeats, called the right border (RB) and left border (LB), which are similar in sequence to oriT nick region sequences from IncP group plasmids. As in the case of oriT, the RB functions to transfer the T-DNA unidirectionally (39). Upon T-DNA transfer, the bottom DNA strand at the RB and LB is cleaved by a site-specific endonuclease complex. The resulting single strand (with the VirD2 protein attached at the 5′ end) is transferred into plant cells, where it integrates into the genome as a linear fragment. In the case of oriT-flanked regions, we envisage that the 5′ end resulting from the nick at one oriT is joined to the 3′ end from the nick site at the other oriT and that the resulting closed circle replicates in E. coli via the introduced origin of replication. Another instance involving oriT-directed recombination arose from classic studies in which F-prime plasmids, made up of the F plasmid carrying chromosomal DNA, were employed in genetic analyses in E. coli. Some of these F-prime plasmids were found to be transfer defective, and subsequent analysis of the DNA sequences from the chromosome-F plasmid boundary regions of these plasmids indicated they were formed via recombination between the F (Hfr) oriT and F oriT-like sequences in the chromosome (29).
Our data show that S. meliloti regions flanked by RK2 oriT sites can be efficiently rescued in E. coli. However, the precise mechanism through which the excised region is generated, that is, whether oriT, in association with transfer proteins, catalyzes recombination-ligation in the donor strain prior to DNA transfer or in the recipient following transfer, remains unknown. In this respect, it is interesting that conjugation-independent site-specific recombination at the oriT of plasmid R1162 has been reported (35), and similar recombination at the oriT of plasmid R388 is known to be mediated by the R388 transfer protein TrwC (32 see also reference 15). In principle, the capture of oriT-flanked regions can be applied to any bacteria and has potential in the efficient cloning of gene clusters for subsequent use in the generation of mosaic organisms.
The application of the in vivo cloning procedure allowed us to generate six contiguous BAC clones totaling 800 kb of S. meliloti pExo DNA without generating any overlapping redundancy (Fig. 4). Nucleotide sequencing of the AA, AC, AE, and AF clones confirmed that the boundaries originating from the same insertion lie within the same gene (data not shown) and carry the predicted 9-bp duplication generated upon Tn5 insertion (9).
In the analysis of the 60-kb AA region, we have located a gene region that appears to constitute the replication origin (oriV) of the pExo megaplasmid. Within this region are three genes (repA, repB, and repC) whose products are homologous to other proteins involved in plasmid replication. The RepA and RepB proteins show significant sequence similarity to proteins, such as SopA and SopB of the F plasmid, which function in partitioning of various plasmids and bacterial chromosomes. On the other hand, with a single exception, all of the pExo RepC protein homologs were from plasmids present in members of the Rhizobiaceae (over 40% identity to Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234, A. rhizogenes, A. tumefaciens, R. leguminosarum, and R. etli). The exception was RepC from plasmid pTAV320, which is present in the α-proteobacterium Paracoccus versutus (previously Thiobacillus versutus). Thus, these RepC proteins likely represent a distinct class of plasmid replication proteins. Our results on the relative stabilities of clones carrying the pExo RepABC versus RepC alone in A. tumefaciens lend support to the inferred roles of these proteins in plasmid replication (RepC) and segregation (RepA and RepB) (8, 37, 45, 54, 56, 61).
Margolin and Long (35) identified a pExo autonomously replicating sequence (ARS) of 800 bp which required trans-acting factors from an unidentified region of pExo for its replication. As S. meliloti derivatives which lack the ARS region retain pExo, the authors suggested that pExo contains multiple origins. The ARS is located over 700 kb from the repABC region, and hence these two regions are clearly distinct. It will be of interest to determine whether the repABC genes are sufficient to support replication of the ARS, and in this respect we note that comparisons of the ARS and repABC region have failed to reveal any shared sequence motifs.
In an earlier study we were unable to obtain S. meliloti strains in which the (repABC)-oriV-containing region had been deleted (17). The simplest explanation is that this region carries the major replication genes and associated origin of replication. In the absence of these, the remainder of pExo (ca. 1,600 kb) would be lost from the cell, directly resulting in loss of cell viability. Alternatively, the 60-kb region carrying repABC-oriV may harbor other genes that are required for cell viability or a regulatory gene that controls a toxic gene similar to kil-kor systems. Further study is required to resolve this issue.
With the cloning approach described here, we have obtained clones of 140, 200, and 240 kb in size, considerably larger than previously reported BAC clones containing prokaryotic DNA. This may reflect limitations in the in vitro cloning methodologies used, although clones carrying inserts of up to 700 kb have been obtained for eukaryotic DNA. In the case of a recent BAC library prepared from the total genome of the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis (12), the authors reported particular difficulty in obtaining BAC clones with inserts of greater than 100 kb. Moreover, in the case of a recently reported BAC library of the S. meliloti chromosome, the average insert size was 80 kb (14). Brosch et al. (12) suggested that the limit on insert size could be due to plasmid instability resulting from the lethal overexpression of certain M. tuberculosis genes in E. coli. In our study, we have observed that the E. coli colony size varied depending on the particular region of the S. meliloti genome present in the BAC clone; however, we have not yet identified a region that was recalcitrant to cloning in E. coli. This may reflect poor transcriptional activity of S. meliloti promoters in E. coli.
Our novel in vivo procedure has several advantages over conventional BAC or cosmid cloning approaches: (i) through the insertion of oriT at defined sites, the cloning can be directed to specific regions; (ii) very large fragment sizes can readily be obtained in a single plasmid; and (iii) in the context of genome sequencing, the fact that one can generate contiguous, nonoverlapping clones eliminates redundant sequencing of overlapping regions and precludes underrepresentation or gaps within a BAC genomic library. The possible disadvantage is the requirement of a genetic or physical map of the regions being cloned to target the integration of oriT sites to the genome. In addition, once oriT is inserted at defined locations, it is necessary to construct strains carrying pairs of oriT insertions in parallel orientation. In our case, the latter was readily accomplished by transduction.
We are currently determining the nucleotide sequences of the pExo regions described in this report (http://life.biology.mcmaster.ca/brian/Rhizobium/pEXO.html). This project is part of an international project to determine the nucleotide sequence of the complete S. meliloti genome (http://sequence.toulouse.inra.fr/meliloti.html). The sequence of the pSym megaplasmid is currently being determined from an enriched random shotgun library of pSym DNA purified by pulsed-field agarose gel electrophoresis (S. Long and colleagues, http://cmgm.stanford.edu/∼mbarnett/genome.htm), whereas the sequence of the 3,500-kb chromosome is being determined from a recently reported minimal 49-BAC clone library (14).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by NSERC grants to T.M.F. and B.G.
We thank J. Wild and W. Szybalski for discussion, strains, and plasmids; H. Schweizer for plasmid pUC30T; A. Cowie for technical assistance; and P. Aneja and M. Osteras for insightful comments on the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Alting-Mees M A, Short J M. pBluescript II: gene mapping vectors. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:9494. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.22.9494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Altschul S F, Madden T L, Schaffer A A, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman D J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aneja P, Charles T C. Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate degradation in Rhizobium (Sinorhizobium) meliloti: isolation and characterization of a gene encoding 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:849–857. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.3.849-857.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Banfalvi Z, Kondorosi E, Kondorosi A. Rhizobium meliloti carries two megaplasmids. Plasmid. 1985;13:129–138. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(85)90065-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Banfalvi Z, Sakanyan V, Koncz C, Kiss A, Dusha I, Kondorosi A. Location of nodulation and nitrogen fixation genes on a high molecular weight plasmid of R. meliloti. Mol Gen Genet. 1981;184:318–325. doi: 10.1007/BF00272925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bardin S, Dan S, Osteras M, Finan T M. A phosphate transport system is required for symbiotic nitrogen fixation by Rhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:4540–4547. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.15.4540-4547.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Barlett M M, Erickson M J, Meyer R J. Recombination between directly repeated origins of conjugative transfer cloned in M13 bacteriophage DNA models ligation of the transferred plasmid strand. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:3579–3586. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.12.3579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bartosik D, Baj J, Wlodarczyk M. Molecular and functional analysis of pTAV320, a repABC-type replicon of the Paracoccus versutus composite plasmid pTAV1. Microbiology. 1998;144:3149–3157. doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-11-3149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Berg D E, Johnsrud L, McDivitt L, Ramabhadran R, Hirschel B J. Inverted repeats of Tn5 are transposable elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:2632–2635. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.8.2632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Birnboim H C, Doly J. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;7:1513–1523. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.6.1513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Broome-Smith J. RecA independent, site-specific recombination between ColE1 or ColK and a miniplasmid they complement for mobilization and relaxation: implications for the mechanism of DNA transfer during mobilization. Plasmid. 1980;1:51–63. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(80)90082-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brosch R, Gordon S V, Billault A, Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Soravito C, Barrell B G, Cole S T. Use of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv bacterial artificial chromosome library for genome mapping, sequencing, and comparative genomics. Infect Immun. 1998;66:2221–2229. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.5.2221-2229.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Burkardt B, Schillik D, Puhler A. Physical characterization of Rhizobium meliloti megaplasmids. Plasmid. 1987;17:13–25. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(87)90004-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Capela D, Barloy-Hubler F, Gatius M T, Gouzy J, Galibert F. A high-density physical map of Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 chromosome derived from bacterial artificial chromosome library. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:9357–9362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Carter J R, Porter R D. traY and traI are required for oriT-dependent enhanced recombination between lac-containing plasmids and λplac5. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:1027–1034. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.3.1027-1034.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Charles T C, Finan T M. Genetic map of Rhizobium meliloti megaplasmid pRmeSU47b. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:2469–2476. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.5.2469-2476.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Charles T C, Finan T M. Analysis of a 1600-kilobase Rhizobium meliloti megaplasmid using defined deletions generated in vivo. Genetics. 1991;127:5–20. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.De Picker A, De Wilde M, De Vos G F, De Vos M, Van Montagu M, Schell J. Molecular cloning of overlapping segments of the nopaline Ti-plasmid pTiC58 as a means to restriction enzyme analysis. Plasmid. 1980;3:193–211. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(80)90109-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Derbyshire K M, Willetts N S. Mobilization of the non-conjugative plasmid RSF1010: a genetic analysis of its origin of transfer. Mol Gen Genet. 1987;206:154–160. doi: 10.1007/BF00326551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Figurski D H, Helinski D R. Replication of an origin-containing derivative of plasmid RK2 dependent on a plasmid function provided in trans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:1648–1652. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.4.1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Finan T M, Hartweig E, LeMieux K, Bergman K, Walker G C, Signer E R. General transduction in Rhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol. 1984;159:120–124. doi: 10.1128/jb.159.1.120-124.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Finan T M, Kunkel B, De Vos G F, Signer E R. Second symbiotic megaplasmid in Rhizobium meliloti carrying exopolysaccharide and thiamine synthesis genes. J Bacteriol. 1986;167:66–72. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.1.66-72.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Finan T M, Oresnik I, Bottacin A. Mutants of Rhizobium meliloti defective in succinate metabolism. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:3396–3403. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.8.3396-3403.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Freiberg C, Fellay R, Bairoch A, Broughton W J, Rosenthal A, Perret X. Molecular basis of symbiosis between Rhizobium and legumes. Nature. 1997;387:394–401. doi: 10.1038/387394a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Frengen E, Weichenhan D, Zhao B, Osoegawa K, van Geel M, de Jong P J. A modular, positive selection bacterial artificial chromosome vector with multiple cloning sites. Genomics. 1999;58:250–253. doi: 10.1006/geno.1998.5693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gao Q, Luo Y, Deonier R C. Initiation and termination of DNA transfer at F plasmid oriT. Mol Microbiol. 1994;11:449–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00326.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Glazebrook J, Ichige A, Walker G C. A Rhizobium meliloti homolog of the Escherichia coli peptide-antibiotic transport protein SbmA is essential for bacteroid development. Genes Dev. 1993;7:1485–1497. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.8.1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Honeycutt R J, McClelland M, Sobral B W. Physical map of the genome of Rhizobium meliloti 1021. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:6945–6952. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.21.6945-6952.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Horowitz B, Deonier R C. Formation of Δtra F′ plasmids: specific recombination at oriT. J Mol Biol. 1985;186:267–274. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90103-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hynes M F, Simon R, Muller P, Niehaus K, Labes M, Puhler A. The two megaplasmids of Rhizobium meliloti are involved in the effective nodulation of alfalfa. Mol Gen Genet. 1986;202:356–362. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lanka E, Wilkins B M. DNA processing reactions in bacterial conjugation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995;64:141–169. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.001041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Llosa M, Bolland S, Grandoso G, de la Cruz F. Conjugation-independent, site-specific recombination at the oriT of the IncW plasmid R388 mediated by TrwC. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:3210–3217. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.11.3210-3217.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Long S R, Buikema W J, Ausubel F M. Cloning of Rhizobium meliloti genes by direct complementation of Nod− mutants. Nature. 1982;298:485–488. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Manis J J, Kline B C. Restriction endonuclease mapping and mutagenesis of the F sex factor replication region. Mol Gen Genet. 1977;152:175–182. doi: 10.1007/BF00268815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Margolin W, Long S R. Isolation and characterization of a DNA replication origin from the 1,700-kilobase-pair symbiotic megaplasmid pSym-b of Rhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:6553–6561. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.20.6553-6561.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Meade H M, Singer E R. Genetic mapping of Rhizobium meliloti. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977;74:2076–2078. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.5.2076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mercado-Blanco J, Olivares J. The large nonsymbiotic plasmid pRmeGR4a of Rhizobium meliloti GR4 encodes a protein involved in replication that has homology with the RepC protein of Agrobacterium plasmids. Plasmid. 1994;32:75–79. doi: 10.1006/plas.1994.1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Meyer R. Site-specific recombination at oriT of plasmid R1162 in the absence of conjugative transfer. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:799–806. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.2.799-806.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Miranda A, Janssen G, Hodges L, Peralta E, Ream W. Agrobacterium tumefaciens transfers extremely long T-DNAs by a unidirectional mechanism. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:2288–2297. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.7.2288-2297.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nishiguchi R, Takanami M, Oka A. Characterization and sequence determination of the replicator region in the hairy-root-inducing plasmid pRiA4b. Mol Gen Genet. 1987;206:1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pansegrau W, Schroder W, Lanka E. Relaxase (TraI) of IncP alpha plasmid RP4 catalyzes a site-specific cleaving-joining reaction of single-stranded DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:2925–2929. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.7.2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Paterson E S, Iyer V N. Localization of the nic site of IncN conjugative plasmid pCU1 through formation of a hybrid oriT. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:5768–5776. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.18.5768-5776.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Paterson E S, More M I, Pillay G, Cellini C, Woodgate R, Walker G C, Iyer V N, Winans S C. Genetic analysis of the mobilization and leading regions of the IncN plasmids pKM101 and pCU1. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:2572–2583. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.8.2572-2583.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Prentki P, Krisch H M. In vitro insertional mutagenesis with a selectable DNA fragment. Gene. 1984;29:303–313. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ramirez-Romero M A, Bustos P, Girard L, Rodriguez O, Cevallos M A, Davila G. Sequence, localization and characteristics of the replicator region of the symbiotic plasmid of Rhizobium etli. Microbiology. 1997;143:2825–2831. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-8-2825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rosenberg C, Boistard P, Dénarié J, Casse-Delbart F. Genes controlling early and late functions in symbiosis are located on a megaplasmid in Rhizobium meliloti. Mol Gen Genet. 1981;184:326–333. doi: 10.1007/BF00272926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rosenberg C, Casse-Delbart F, Dusha I, David M, Boucher C. Megaplasmids in the plant-associated bacteria Rhizobium meliloti and Pseudomonas solanacearum. J Bacteriol. 1982;150:402–406. doi: 10.1128/jb.150.1.402-406.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rosenberg C, Huguet T. The pAtC58 plasmid is not essential for tumour induction. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;196:533–536. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rossi L, Tinland B, Hohn B. Role of virulence proteins of Agrobacterium in the plant. In: Spaink H P, Kondorosi A, Hooykass P J J, editors. The Rhizobiacae: molecular biology of model plant-associated bacteria. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998. pp. 303–320. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schmidhauser T J, Helinski D R. Regions of broad-host-range plasmid RK2 involved in replication and stable maintenance in nine species of gram-negative bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1985;164:446–455. doi: 10.1128/jb.164.1.446-455.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50a.Schweizer H P, Klassen T R, Hoang T. Improved methods for gene analysis and expression in Pseudomonas. In: Nakazawa T, Furukawa K, Haas D, Silver S, editors. Molecular biology of pseudomonads. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 1996. pp. 229–237. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sherman J A, Matson S W. Escherichia coli DNA helicase I catalyzes a sequence-specific cleavage/ligation reaction at the F plasmid origin of transfer. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:26220–26226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Simon R, Priefer U, Puhler A. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram negative bacteria. Bio/Technology. 1983;1:37–43. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Suzuki K, Ohta N, Hattori Y, Uraji M, Kato A, Yoshida K. Novel structural difference between nopaline- and octopine-type trbJ genes: construction of genetic and physical map and sequencing of trb/traI and rep gene clusters of a new Ti plasmid pTi-SAKURA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1396:1–7. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4781(97)00182-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tabata S, Hooykaas P J, Oka A. Sequence determination and characterization of the replicator region in the tumor-inducing plasmid pTiB6S3. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:1665–1672. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.3.1665-1672.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Thompson J D, Higgins D G, Gibson T J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Turner S L, Young J P. The replicator region of the Rhizobium leguminosarum cryptic plasmid pRL8JI. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;133:53–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07860.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Warren G J, Clark A J. Sequence-specific recombination of plasmid ColE1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;11:6724–6728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Watson R J, Chan Y K, Wheatcroft R, Yang A F, Han S H. Rhizobium meliloti genes required for C4-dicarboxylate transport and symbiotic nitrogen fixation are located on a megaplasmid. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:927–934. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.2.927-934.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wild J, Hradecná Z, Pósfai G, Szybalski W. A broad-host-range in vivo pop-out and amplification system for generating large quantities of 50- to 100-kb genomic fragments for direct DNA sequencing. Gene. 1996;179:181–188. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00487-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wilkins B, Lanka E. DNA processing and replication during plasmid transfer between Gram-negative bacteria. In: Clewell D B, editor. Bacterial conjugation. New York, N.Y: Plenum Press; 1993. pp. 105–129. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Williams D R, Thomas C M. Active partitioning of bacterial plasmids. J Gen Microbiol. 1992;138:1–16. doi: 10.1099/00221287-138-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yakobson E A, Guiney D G. Conjugal transfer of bacterial chromosomes mediated by the RK2 plasmid transfer origin cloned into transposon Tn5. J Bacteriol. 1984;160:451–453. doi: 10.1128/jb.160.1.451-453.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zambryski P. Basic processes underlying Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer to plant cells. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:1–30. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.000245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]