| Commodity | Region a | Residue levels observed in the supervised residue trials (mg/kg) | Comments/Source | Calculated MRL (mg/kg) | HR b (mg/kg) | STMR c (mg/kg) | CF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potatoes | NEU |
RD Mo: 12 × < 0.01 RD RA: – |
Trials on potatoes with lambda‐cyhalothrin compliant with the GAP (EFSA, 2015) | 0.01* | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1 d |
| Brussels sprouts | NEU |
RD Mo: 2× 0.01; 4 × < 0.02; 2 × 0.02 RD RA: – |
Trials performed with lambda‐cyhalothrin according to a more critical GAP (2 × 10 g a.s./ha, PHI: 3 d) (EFSA, 2015) deemed acceptable on a tentative basis. MRLOECD = 0.04 |
0.04 (tentative) e | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1 d |
| Head cabbages | NEU |
RD Mo: 0.04; 0.05; 2 × 0.07; 0.08; 2 × 0.10; 0.11 adjusted residues by a factor of 0.5: RD Mo: 0.02; 0.025; 2 × 0.035; 0.04; 2 × 0.05; 0.055 RD RA: – |
Trials performed with lambda‐cyhalothrin according to a more critical GAP (2 × 12.5 g a.s./ha, PHI: 7 days) (EFSA, 2015). Results were adjusted by a factor of 0.5 considering only the proportion of gamma‐cyhalothrin in lambda‐cyhalothrin to derive a tentative MRL. MRLOECD = 0.09 |
0.09 (tentative) e | 0.055 | 0.04 | 1 f |
| Beans, peas (with pods) | NEU |
RD Mo: 6 × < 0.01; 2 × 0.01; 0.02 RD RA: – |
Trials performed with lambda‐cyhalothrin according to a more critical GAP (2 × 7.5 g a.s./ha; PHI 3 days) acceptable on a tentative basis (EFSA, 2015) MRLOECD = 0.02 |
0.03 (tentative) e | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1 d |
| Peas (without pods) | NEU |
RD Mo: 5 × < 0.01 RD RA: – |
Trials performed with lambda‐cyhalothrin according to a more critical GAP (2 × 7.5 g/ha; PHI 3 days), deemed acceptable, as residues are below 0.01 mg/kg (EFSA, 2015).MRLOECD = 0.01 | 0.01* | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1 d |
| Peas, beans (dry) | NEU |
RD Mo: 5 × < 0.01 RD RA: – |
Trials performed with lambda‐cyhalothrin (2 × 7.5 g/ha; PHI 3 days) according to a more critical GAP deemed acceptable as residues are below 0.01 mg/kg (EFSA, 2015).MRLOECD = 0.01 | 0.01* | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1 d |
| Sunflower seeds | NEU |
RD Mo: 2 × < 0.01 RD RA: – |
Trials performed with lambda‐cyhalothrin according to a more critical GAP (2 × 7.5 g a.s./ha, PHI: 21 days, EFSA, 2015) not sufficient for a major crop.MRLOECD = − | – | – | – | – |
| Rapeseeds/canola seeds Poppy seeds Mustard seeds | NEU |
RD Mo: 7 × < 0.01; 0.01 RD RA: – |
Trials on rapeseed conducted with 5–7 applications instead of 2, with the last application within 25% of the cGAP are deemed acceptable, as residues are at or below 0.01 mg/kg (Germany, 2023). Extrapolation to poppy seeds and mustard seeds are possible.MRLOECD = 0.01 | 0.015 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1 d |
| Barley grains, Oat grains | NEU |
RD Mo: < 0.01; 4 × 0.01; 4 × 0.02; 0.03 RD RA: – |
Trials on barley compliant with GAP or performed with 3 instead of 2 applications are acceptable as the first application is not expected to contribute to the final residue (EFSA, 2019; Germany, 2023). Extrapolation to wheat and barley is acceptable.MRLOECD = 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 1 d |
| Wheat grains, Rye grains | NEU |
RD Mo: 13 × < 0.01; 0.01 RD RA: – |
Trials on wheat with 3 applications instead of 2 acceptable as the first application is not expected to impact the final residue (EFSA, 2014a, 2019; Germany, 2023).MRLOECD = 0.01 | 0.015 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1 d |
|
Sugar beet roots Beetroots Fodder beet roots |
NEU |
RD Mo: 6 × < 0.01; RD RA: – |
Trials on sugar beet performed with lambda‐cyhalothrin according to a more critical GAP acceptable as residues are < LOQ (EFSA, 2015). Extrapolation to beet root and fodder beet root applicable.MRLOECD = 0.01 | 0.01* (tentative for fodder beet roots) g | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1 d |
| Pea vines | NEU | – | No GAP compliant data. GAP information unclear | – | – | – | – |
|
Barley straw Oat straw |
NEU |
RD Mo: 0.09; 0.11; 0.16; 0.18; 2 × 0.20; 2 × 0.26; 0.27; 2 × 0.31; 0.49 RD RA: – |
Trials with 3 applications instead of 2 are acceptable as first application is not expected to contribute to the final residues (Germany, 2023). Extrapolation to oat applicable. MRLOECD = 0.71 | 0.8 (tentative) g | 0.49 | 0.23 | 1.12 f |
|
Wheat straw Rye straw |
NEU | Mo: 0.08; 0.11; 0.12; 0.13; 2 × 0.15; 0.16; 0.19; 0.20; 2 × 0.22; 0.25; 0.31; 0.33; 0.51 RD RA: – | Trials with 3 applications instead of 2 are acceptable as first application at early stage not expected to contribute to the final residue (Germany, 2023). MRLOECD = 0.65 | 0.7 (tentative) g | 0.51 | 0.19 | 1.12 f |
|
Sugar beet tops Fodder beet tops |
NEU | Mo: 0.10; 0.12; 0.13; 0.17; 0.19; 0.21 RD RA: – | Trials on sugar beet conducted with lambda‐cyhalothrin according to a more critical GAP (2 × 12.5 g a.s./ha; PHI 14 days vs. 2 × 4.8 g a.s./ha; PHI 28 days) (EFSA, 2015) are tentatively acceptable. Extrapolation to fodder beet tops applicable. MRLOECD = 0.46 | 0.5 (tentative) e , g | 0.21 | 0.15 | 1 f |
Abbreviations: GAP, Good Agricultural Practice; Mo, residue levels expressed according to the monitoring residue definition; MRL, maximum residue level; OECD, Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development; RA, residue levels expressed according to risk assessment residue definition.
Indicates that the MRL is proposed at the limit of quantification.
NEU: Outdoor trials conducted in northern Europe, SEU: Outdoor trials conducted in southern Europe, EU: indoor EU trials, Country code: if non‐EU trials.
Highest residue. The highest residue for risk assessment (RA) refers to the whole commodity and not to the edible portion.
Supervised trials median residue. The median residue for risk assessment (RA) refers to the whole commodity and not to the edible portion.
Metabolite CPCA was not analysed in any of the trials. As in the metabolism studies, the level of parent was always higher than the level of the metabolite, it is assumed that CPCA will not be present at significant levels and a conversion factor (CF) of 1 was considered to recalculate residues according to the residue definition for risk assessment.
MRL is tentative because trials were performed according to a more critical GAP.
Metabolite CPCA was not analysed in any of the trials. Conversion factor (CF) to recalculate residues according to the residue definition for monitoring to the residue definition for risk assessment was derived from the metabolism studies on wheat and cabbage.
Tentative MRLs are derived for feed items in view of the future need to set MRLs in these commodities.