Table 2.
Patient data that is electronically available in each health system scenario and centera.
| Characteristics | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Scenario 3 | |||
|
|
Lithuania | Italy | Spain | Belgium | Germany | |
| Patient data type | ||||||
|
|
Patient summary or medical history | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
Hospital admissions | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
Diagnostic imaging (images) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
Diagnostic imaging (reports) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
Biochemical laboratories | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
Pathology laboratories | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
CCb treatment summary | Yes | Yes | Yes | ?c | Yes |
|
|
LTFUd care visit report | ? | Yes | No | ? | ? |
|
|
SurPasse | No | Yes | No | No | No |
|
|
LTFU center appointments | Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? |
|
|
Other medical databases | ? | ? | No | Yes | Yes |
aAn earlier version of the Survivorship Passport has been implemented and evaluated previously in Italy. Austria was intentionally left out of the table because all answers were missing.
bCC: childhood cancer.
cRespondents did not know.
dLTFU: long-term follow-up.
eSurPass: Survivorship Passport.