Table 3.
b | t | p | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Model 4: T2 PLEs as an outcome variable | ||||
Perceived school bullying (T1) | −0.01 | −0.44 | 0.656 | −0.07, 0.04 |
Resilience (T2) | −0.21 | −7.80 | < 0.001 | −0.26, −0.16 |
Perceived school bullying (T1) ×Resilience (T2) | −0.04 | -1.78 | 0.076 | −0.09, 0.01 |
Model 5: T2 DEs as an outcome variable | ||||
Perceived school bullying (T1) | -0.02 | −0.63 | 0.528 | −0.07, 0.04 |
Resilience (T2) | −0.22 | −8.18 | < 0.001 | −0.28, −0.17 |
Perceived school bullying (T1) ×Resilience (T2) | −0.04 | −1.45 | 0.149 | −0.09, 0.01 |
Model 6: T2 HEs as an outcome variable | ||||
Perceived school bullying (T1) | 0.04 | 1.21 | 0.225 | −0.02, 0.10 |
Resilience (T2) | −0.23 | −4.27 | < 0.001 | −0.19, −0.07 |
Perceived school bullying (T1) ×Resilience (T2) | −0.06 | −2.28 | 0.023 | −0.12, −0.01 |
PLEs = psychotic-like experiences; Des = delusional experiences; HEs = hallucinatory experiences; T1 = Time 1; T2 = Time 2
Model 4: adjusting for sample characteristics, T1 PLEs, and T2 negative life events
Model 5: adjusting for sample characteristics, T1 DEs, and T2 negative life events
Model 6: adjusting for sample characteristics, T1 HEs, and T2 negative life events