Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2024 Mar 25;8(4):439–450. doi: 10.1109/trpms.2024.3379215

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.

Mean difference reconstructed short-axis image between defect-absent and defect-present hypotheses for (a) normal-dose, (b) low-dose, (c) TADL, and (d) DEMIST. The images in (a)–(d) are windowed to a region centered to the defect centroid. (e) Line profile of the mean difference reconstructed image of (a)–(d). The red dashed lines in (a) represent the lines along which the profiles are drawn. (f) Mean difference channel vector Δv¯ between defect-absent and defect-present hypotheses for various approaches. (g) Absolute value of coefficient αm and (h) eigenvalue spectra of noise covariance matrix. Low-dose level was set to 6.25% (Defect type 1: 60° extent, 25% severity and anterior wall defect. Defect type 2: 45° extent, 25% severity and inferior wall defect).