Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 30;39(4):393–407. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01110-y

Table 2.

Bladder cancer risk (Odd Ratio [OR] and 95% confidence intervals) by quartiles of smoking metrics

Crude Modela Adjusted on cg05575921 (AHRR) Adjusted on PC1b
OR p-value OR p-value OR p-value
Pack-years Q1 vs Q2 1.823 (1.33, 2.50) 1.75e − 04 1.36 (0.98, 1.90) 6.95e − 02 1.328 (0.98, 1.89) 9.09e − 02
Q1 vs Q3 2.981 (2.17, 4.11) 2.04e − 11 2.022 (1.43, 2.87) 7.38e − 05 2.013 (1.43, 2.87) 5.28e − 05
Q1 vs Q4 2.933 (2.16, 4.00) 9.08e − 12 1.817 (1.28, 2.59) 9.24e − 04 1.751 (1.28, 2.56) 1.31e − 03
Duration (years) Q1 vs Q2 2.283 (1.64, 3.20) 1.44e − 06 1.683 (1.18, 2.40) 3.97e − 03 1.628 (1.18, 2.40) 6.50e − 03
Q1 vs Q3 3.751 (2.67, 5.30) 4.10e − 14 2.51 (1.73, 3.65) 1.36e − 06 2.474 (1.73, 3.65) 1.06e − 06
Q1 vs Q4 3.465 (2.44, 4.95) 4.90e − 12 2.113 (1.42, 3.15) 2.36e − 04 2.061 (1.42, 3.15) 2.26e − 04
Intensity (packs/day) Q1 vs Q2 2.703 (2.03, 3.62) 1.77e − 11 1.985 (1.46, 2.70) 1.15e − 05 2.036 (1.46, 2.70) 4.04e − 06
Q1 vs Q3 2.636 (1.71, 4.07) 1.06e − 05 1.909 (1.22, 2.98) 4.43e − 03 1.913 (1.22, 2.98) 4.35e − 03
Q1 vs Q4 2.551 (1.87, 3.48) 3.15e − 09 1.694 (1.21, 2.37) 2.10e − 03 1.657 (1.21, 2.37) 2.80e − 03

Results are also presented for the model additionally adjusted for the methylation level at cg05575921 (AHHR), the strongest CpG-site associated with smoking status in our dataset and on the first principal component (PC1) summarising the methylation levels at the 200 smoking-related CpG sites in our data

Quartile definition (sample size):

Pack-years: Q1: [0, 15[ (n = 383); Q2: [15, 31[ (n = 378); Q3: [31, 46[ (n = 381); Q4: [46, 184] (n = 403)

Duration (years): Q1: [0, 20[ (n = 359); Q2: [20, 34[ (n = 391); Q3: [34, 40[ (n = 322); Q4: [40, 59] (n = 473)

Intensity (packs/day): Q1: [0, 0.5[ (n = 300); Q2: [0.5, 1[ (n = 334); Q3: [1, 1.27[ (n = 522); Q4: [1.27, 4] (n = 389)

aAll models were adjusted for age, sex and centre

bPC1 explains 19.3% of the total variance