Skip to main content
. 2024 May 17;8:103. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00600-2

Fig. 3. Schematic representation of currently used conventional diagnostic tools and prospective diagnostic strategies for glioblastoma identification, discrimination of patients with suspected disease into grades, and longitudinal monitoring of disease progression and/or response to therapy in postoperative and/or patients under therapy.

Fig. 3

In glioma diagnosis using conventional tools, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to detect the tumor, followed by identification and discrimination of different tumor subtypes and grades by invasive tissue biopsy analysis. Then repeat MRIs are done to monitor the patient’s tumor progression and response to therapy. In the short-term strategy, after detection of tumor with MRI, tissue biopsy analysis can be combined with an extracellular vesicle (EV) biomarker to increase the accuracy of glioma subtype and grade identification. Further, combining EV biomarker with MRI can provide more reliability in longitudinal analysis of tumor progression and therapy response and overcome the limitations of MRI. In the long-term strategy, using a composite biomarker panel can either predict early disease or be combined with MRI for accurate disease detection. A composite biomarker panel that comprehensively describes the heterogeneous glioma can be used alone to identify the tumor subtype and grade, hence reducing, or even eliminating the need for invasive tissue biopsy analysis, as well as to monitor the disease progression and therapy response in postoperative patients. In diagram abbreviations; MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging); EV (Extracellular Vesicle).