Table 1.

Selected functional key terms from the NeuroSynth database in decreasing order of centrality for each topic, and ALE parameters

NeuroSynth topic	Selected functional key terms					Centrality key terms		ALE analyses
	Term 1	Term 2	Term 3	Term 4	Term 5	Mean convergence	Mean uniqueness	Cerebellar coordinates	Whole brain coordinates	Studies	Participants
1	trait	traits	personality			29	68	531	3023	86	2624
7	reward	rewards	feedback	anticipation		53	87	1353	8823	236	6293
8	mind	tom				94	25	378	2560	54	1164
9	working	wm	load			68	55	1372	7637	184	4519
11	training	trained	practice	sequence		33	98	1647	7760	183	4111
13	fear	threat				31	36	706	2819	79	2099
16	inhibition	inhibitory	stop			55	59	862	4554	113	3461
17	sensorimotor	finger				23	34	1438	7946	156	3104
18	number	numerical	arithmetic	magnitude		33	88	1527	8380	197	5086
19	action	actions	observation	mirror		47	88	1962	13,145	308	6340
20	conflict	interference	incongruent			22	77	890	5981	142	3504
25	location	space				15	38	668	4193	111	2108
26	emotion	affective	valence			33	65	1696	10,852	281	7547
28	empathy	empathic	moral			39	63	396	3215	66	1634
30	decision	decisions	choice	choices	risky	59	110	992	6326	197	4566
31	prediction	predictive	predictions	classification		18	105	1086	6352	162	3796
33	encoding	episodic	retrieval			33	68	2493	14,761	338	9798
37	word	sentences	sentence	reading		32	89	1765	11,182	290	6395
38	objects	category				17	35	1211	7037	208	4659
40	face	faces	facial	expressions		44	90	1817	9090	247	6294
41	events	scenes	scene			10	93	1489	7891	188	4302
47	attention	attentional				57	30	1620	10,440	293	6542
Totals (ignoring contributions to multiple topics)								12,105	71,290	1820	44,506

Functional key terms were ordered along decreasing centrality from terms 1 to 5. Centrality of a key term for a topic is indicated by high overlap of studies sharing the same key term and a low number of studies with unique additional key terms related to the topic but not sharing that key term. This was computed (on all NeuroSynth studies) for two measures with respect to the most representative term 1: Mean overlap = % of studies with key terms 2–5 also sharing key term 1 (averaged across key terms 2–5). Mean uniqueness = % of studies with unique key terms 2–5 not sharing key term 1 (averaged across key terms 2–5). These measures followed the order of terms in NeuroSynth, except in a few cases were key terms were reordered or omitted based on these centrality measures. Centrality measures were conducted on studies before the Quality Check. Totals ignore repetitions due to multiple contributions of some studies to more than one topic. tom, theory of mind; wm, working memory