Table 2.
Summary of findings
| Theme | Enablers | Constraints |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | The intervention appeals and aligns with stakeholders’ goals and aspirations. | The increased workload of providers. |
| Using adolescents as advocates influenced the adoption. | Transferring trained providers | |
| Belief about the timing of SRH communications with young people. | ||
| Fear of delivering SRH in religious settings. | ||
| Individual | The intervention appeals and aligns with individual values and morals. | Interference with personal life. |
| It brought direct and indirect benefits for community advocates | Scepticism of the importance and impact of SRH issues | |
| Poorly trained providers | ||
| Intervention related | Adapted to local contexts. | Technicalities and ambiguities in the manual |
| Multi-stakeholder engagement. | Shortages of materials and tools | |
| Use of the multicomponent approach | Conflict of interest with project objectives. | |
| Active and recognized roles assigned to stakeholders | Poorly recruited advocates and providers | |
| Training of advocates. | Non-provision of stipends to providers and advocates. | |
| Supply of materials needed for awareness. | Profit orientation of PPMVs |