Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Jun 20;5(12):1104–1113. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.06.007

Table 2.

Differences and commonalities in white matter microstructure between individuals with or at risk for BD and HV that met criterion for robustness.

Peak MNI coordinate Voxels P Hemisphere Regions

Individuals with BD
Fractional anisotropy: BD < HV
 24, 34, 8 2089 <.00001 R CC, ATR
 −42, −50, 36 42 .00007 L SLF
 14, 40, 36 33 .00001 R CC
 20, −46, 54 22 .00001 R CC
 12, 0, −10 31 .00025 R Inter-striatal WM
Radial diffusivity: BD > HV
 24, 34, 8 603 <.00001 R ATR, CC
 26, −20, 34 101 <.00001 R CST
 −30, −18, 34 48 .00013 L SLF
 16, 32, −16 38 .00008 R FOP
Conjunction: Reduced FA ^ Increased RD
 23, 34, 8 458 <.005 R ATR, CC
 21, −19, 36 25 <.005 R SLF
 15, 32, −11 21 <.005 R FOP
Individuals at risk for BD
Fractional anisotropy: AR < HV
 26, −56, 24 80 <.00001 R CC body
 −12, −32, 26 52 .00024 L CC splenium
 −24, −20, 34 37 .00047 L CST
Endophenotype
Decreased fractional anisotropy: (BD < HV) ^ (AR < HV)
 −12, −31, 26 52 <.005 L CC splenium
 25, −53, 20 39 <.005 R CC body
Disease marker
Fractional anisotropy: BD < AR = HV
 2, −10, 6 83 <.00001 R ATR

Abbreviations: AR, at risk; ATR, anterior thalamic radiations; BD, bipolar disorder; CC, corpus callosum; CST, corticospinal tract; FA, fractional anisotropy; FOP, fronto-orbito-polar tract; HV, healthy volunteers; L, left; R, right; RD, radial diffusivity; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculus.