Skip to main content
. 2000 Mar 15;28(6):1374–1380. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.6.1374

Table 1. Contributions of nucleoside substitutions and thermal stabilitiesa of TSL constructs.

TSL Substitution contribution Tm (°C) ΔH (kcal/mol) ΔS (cal/mol) ΔG37 (kcal/mol)
Unmodified Precursor 54.5 ± 0.3 –49.0 ± 1.0 –149.0 ± 4.0 –2.6 ± 0.1
T54 Natural modification 56.7 ± 0.4 –52.0 ± 2.0 –157.0 ± 7.0 –3.1 ± 0.1
T54 m5C60b Natural modification in unnatural position 57.2 ± 0.2 –49.0 ± 1.0 –149.0 ± 3.0 –3.0 ± 0.1
T54Ψ55 Natural modifications NDc ND ND ND
dU54 Sugar pucker in C2′-endo conformation 53.2 ± 0.5 –48.0 ± 2.0 –146.0 ± 8.0 –2.4 ± 0.1
dU55 Sugar pucker prefers C2′-endo 53.7 ± 0.6 –49.0 ± 2.0 –151.0 ± 6.0 –2.5 ± 0.1
dU54dU55 Sugar pucker prefers C2′-endo 52.9 ± 0.4 –48.0 ± 2.0 –146.0 ± 6.0 –2.3 ± 0.2
Ψ55 Natural modification 53.8 ± 0.8 –49.0 ± 5.0 –149.0 ± 20.0 –2.5 ± 0.3
m1Ψ55d Negates hydrogen bonding at N1 position 53.8 ± 0.3 –47.0 ± 1.0 –143.0 ± 3.0 –2.4 ± 0.1
m1m3Ψ55 Negates hydrogen bonding capabilities 53.2 ± 0.8 –48.0 ± 3.0 –148.0 ± 8.0 –2.4 ± 0.2

aValues are averages based on four different RNA concentrations for most oligomers. Errors are standard deviations derived from multiple iterations of denaturation and renaturation. ΔG values were calculated at 37°C.

bValues based on two different RNA concentrations.

cND, not determined.

dValues based on one RNA concentration.