Table 1. Comparison of Electrolytic N2 Reduction Performance for MoS2-Based Composite Electrocatalysts under Ambient Conditions.
| catalysta | electrolyte | NH3 yield (μg h–1mgcat.–1) | FE % | potential (V vs RHE) | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MoS2-rGO/CP | 0.1 M LiClO4 | 24.82 | 4.58 | –0.45 | (23) |
| MoS2 NDs-RGO/CC | 0.1 M Na2SO4 | 16.41 | 27.93 | –0.75 | (25) |
| MoS2-gC3N4/CC | 0.1 M LiClO4 | 18.5 | 17.8 | –0.3 | (22) |
| FeS2/MoS2@rGO/CC | M KOH | 10.35 | 9.62 | –0.4 | (60) |
| FeS2/MoS2@rGO/CC | 1.0 M K2SO4 | 41.1 | 38.6 | –0.2 | |
| MoS2@rGO/CC | 1.0 M K2SO4 | 27.1 | 25.5 | –0.3 | |
| MoS2@BCCF/CC | 0.1 M Li2SO4 | 43.4 | 9.81 | –0.2 | (61) |
| 1T-MoS2@Ti3C2/GCE | 0.1 M HCl | 30.33 | 10.94 | –0.3 | (62) |
| 1T’-MoS2@Ti3C2/GCE | 0.1 M Na2SO4 | 31.93 | 30.75 | –0.95 | (63) |
| 2H-MoS2@Ti3C2/GCE | 0.1 M Na2SO4 | 26.41 | 5.23 | ||
| FeS2/MoS2@IFx/CC | 0.1 M KOH | 7.1 × 10–10b | 4.6 | –0.5 | (64) |
| MoS2@rGO/GCE | 0.1 M KOH | 195.4 | 34.65 | –0.3 | this work |
a
MoS2, molybdenum disulfide; CP, carbon paper; NDs, nanodots; CC, carbon cloth; GCE, glassy carbon electrode; rGO, reduced graphene oxide; gC3N4, graphitic carbon nitride; FeS2, iron sulfide; BCCF, bacterial cellulose converted carbon fiber; Ti3C2, titanium carbide MXene; IF, iron framework.
b
→ mol s–1cm–2