Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2023 Apr 12;71(3-4):453–464. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12663

TABLE 2.

Model fit indices for measurement models.

1 Class 2 Classes 3 Classes 4 Classes
T1
 Log likelihood −682.19 −504.19 −445.262 −318.88
 BIC 1404.981 1074.35 981.88 754.48
 VLMR-LRT N/A 0.004 0.199 0.416
 BLRT N/A 0.000 0.000 0.000
T2
 Log likelihood −688.43 −497.52 −403.01 −369.76
 BIC 1416.62 1059.64 895.47 853.84
 VLMR-LRT N/A 0.067 0.301 0.157
 BLRT N/A 0.000 0.000 1.000
T3
 Log likelihood −467.56 −299.74 −219.31 −183.49
 BIC 973.35 661.60 524.64 476.90
 VLMR-LRT N/A 0.135 0.784 0.740
 BLRT N/A 0.000 0.000 0.000
T4
 Log likelihood −418.78 −265.04 −232.77 −188.16
 BIC 874.64 590.32 548.97 482.92
 VLMR-LRT N/A 0.201 0.484 0.716
 BLRT N/A 0.000 0.000 0.000

Note: T1 = time point 1; T2 = time point 2; T3 = time point 3; T4 = time point 4. For Waves 2–4, in the 3- and 4-class solutions, the best loglikelihood was not replicated, suggesting that standard errors may not be trustworthy. Additionally, for waves 3 and 4, the 3- and 4-class models each had one class that represented less than 5% of the overall sample.

Abbreviations: BIC, Bayesian Information Criteria; BLRT, Bootstrapped Likelihood Ratio Test; VLMR-LRT, Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test.