1 |
B-R |
1. In patients with reduced LV function and persistent (or high burden) AF, a trial of rhythm control should be recommended to evaluate whether AF is contributing to the reduced LV function.1-6
|
2a |
B-R |
2. In patients with symptomatic AF, rhythm control can be useful to improve symptoms.7-11
|
2a |
B-R |
3. In patients with a recent diagnosis of AF (<1 year), rhythm control can be useful to reduce hospitalizations, stroke, and mortality.12-14
|
2a |
B-R |
4. In patients with AF and HF, rhythm control can be useful for improving symptoms and improving outcomes, such as mortality and hospitalizations for HF and ischemia.15-19
|
2a |
B-NR |
5. In patients with AF, rhythm-control strategies can be useful to reduce the likelihood of AF progression.20-27
|
2b |
C-LD |
6. In patients with AF where symptoms associated with AF are uncertain, a trial of rhythm control (eg, cardioversion or pharmacological therapy) may be useful to determine what if any symptoms are attributable to AF.28-32
|
2b |
B-NR |
7. In patients with AF, rhythm-control strategies may be useful to reduce the likelihood of development of dementia or worsening cardiac structural abnormalities.33-45
|