Skip to main content
. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0303111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303111

Table 2. Comparison of different patient groups deriving from the computerized decision support approach using visual reads; matching Fig 1A.

1. Direct sufficient certain diagnosis 2. PET not useful 3. PET helpful to establish diagnosis 4. Not diagnosed
n = 155 n = 71 n = 33 n = 27
Female, n(%) 68 (44) 30 (42) 14 (42) 17 (63)
Age, in years 62 ± 8 64 ± 8 67 ± 8 66 ± 6
APOE e4 carrier, n(%) 76 (49) 33 (46) 17 (52) 14 (56)
MMSE 26 ± 4 26 ± 3 22 ± 5 23 ± 4
Amyloid-PET, visual read
Negative 87 (56) 44 (62) 12 (36) 6 (22)
Positive 68 (44) 27 (38) 21 (64) 21 (78)
Clinical diagnosis
Control 87 (64) 41 (30) 3 (2) 4 (3)
AD 47 (44) 20 (19) 23 (21) 18 (17)
FTD 17 (52) 8 (24) 5 (15) 3 (9)
VaD 4 (40) 2 (20) 2 (20) 2 (20)
Difference with second DSI 0.33 ± 0.09 0.08 ± 0.05 0.10 ± 0.06 0.11 ± 0.06
AUC +, n(%) 57 (37) 24 (34) 20 (61) 16 (59)

MMSE: Mini-Mental state Examination, AD: Alzheimer´s disease, FTD: Frontotemporal dementia, VAD: Vascular dementia, DSI: Disease State Index, Difference with second DSI: DSI based on demographics, APOE, neuropsychology and MRI, AUC +: number of patients fulfilling appropriate use criteria according to [13], operationalized as described in [14]