Skip to main content
. 2019 May 22;76(21):4341–4354. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03114-4

Table 2.

Grades of steatosis and fibrosis in liver tissue by the Brunt scoring

NC (n = 10) HFD (n = 13) HFrD (n = 11) R_NC (n = 15) R_HFD (n = 16) R_HFrD (n = 14)
Steatosis
 Grade 0 8 (80%) 5 (45.45%) 14 (93.33%) 12 (75%) 4 (28.57%)
 Grade 1 2 (20%) 8 (61.54%)* 6 (54.55%) 1 (6.67%) 4 (14%) 10 (71.43%)
 Grade 2
 Grade 3 5 (38.46%)*
 Micro-vesicular 12 (92.31%) 5 (45.45%) 1 (6.67%) 4 (25%) 10 (71.43%)
 Macro-vesicular 9 (69.23%) 3 (36.36%) 1 (6.25%)
Fibrosis
 Grade 0 10(100%) 8 (61.54%) 8 (72.73%) 14 (93.33%) 15 (93.75%) 14 (100%)
 Grade 1 5 (38.46%) 3 (27.27%) 1 (6.67%) 1 (6.25%)

Steatosis: grade 0: < 5% hepatocytes involved, grade 1: 5–33% hepatocytes involved, grade 2: 33–66% hepatocytes involved, grade 3: > 66% hepatocytes involved

Fibrosis: grade 0: no fibrosis, grade 1: zone3 perivenular, perisinusoidal, or pericellular fibrosis; focal and extensive

*P significant NC vs HFD, one way ANOVA in steatosis < 0.05