Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 8;75(3):447–465. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2622-x

Table 1.

GlyR modulators

Modulator Group Potency, μM (EC50) GlyR selectivity Techniques employed Additional targets Pain models References
Cannabidiol (CBD), dehydroxyl-cannabidiol (DH-CBD) Cannabinoid ligand ≈3–5 α1 ≈ α3 > α2 Electrophysiology

GPR55, CB2, TRPV1, PLA2,

5-HT1A

CFA; spinal nerve ligation [50, 169, 170]
2,6-Di-tert-butylphenol (2,6-DTBP) Propofol analog ≈20–25 α3 > α1 Electrophysiology HCN1 Zymosan A, CFA; chronic constriction injury [29, 137]
Propofol analog ≈0.001 α1 > α3 = α2 Electrophysiology ND Partial nerve ligation, streptozocin-induced diabetic neuropathy [52]
Gelsemine Natural alkaloid ≈0.6–49a

α2 ≈ α3 (inhibition)

α1 (biphasic modulation)

Electrophysiology,3H-strychnine binding ND Formalin-induced pain, bone cancer, spinal nerve ligation [156, 157]
AM-1488/AM-3607 Tricyclic sulfonamide ≈0.016–0.066 α1 ≈ α2 ≈ α3 Fluorescence-based membrane potential assays ND Spared nerve injury [53, 163]
Compound 19 and (ent2)-20

Azetidine sulfonamides

aminothiazole sulfone

0.7 (at α3/β)

2.2 (at α3/β)

α1 = α3 

ND

Fluorescence-based chloride flux measurement ND ND [164, 171]
Compound 2 (4-fluoro-N-(2-(quinolin-8-yloxy)ethyl) benzenesulfonamide) Sulfonamide ≈3.9–8.0 α1 = α3 Fluorescence-based membrane potential assays, electrophysiology (ion flux HT assay and manual patch-clamp) ND ND [162]
Compounds 3 and 6 sesterterpene glycinyl-lactams ≈8.5 (compound 3)

Compound 3: α1 > α3

Compound 6: α3 > α1

Electrophysiology ND ND [159161]
Tropisetron (ICS-205,930) tropeines

nM

>10 µM

fmolar

µmolar

α1/β, α2/β

potentiation

inhibition

α1 potentiation

α2 inhibition

Electrophysiology

Electrophysiology

5-HT3

5-HT3

ND

ND

[144]

[146]

ND not determined, CFA complete Freund’s adjuvant

aBiphasic modulation