Table 1.
Studies conducted to evaluate the role of apoE as a potential CSF biomarker
Study | Study groups | CSF levels in AD/study groups | Association with APOE genotype/core markers | Analysis method |
---|---|---|---|---|
Van Harten et al. [71] | Non-demented individuals (n = 430) classified into subjective cognitive decline (SCD, n = 207) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 213) | CSF levels were higher in MCI compared to SCD at baseline, on stratification of MCI and SCD into ε4 and non-ε4 carriers and significant difference was seen only in ε4 carriers | CSF levels were strongly associated with CSF T-tau and P-tau in APOE ε4 carriers | ELISA |
Johansson et al. [72] | AD (n = 29), other dementias (n = 4), stable cognitive function (SMCI, n = 13) and healthy controls (n = 18) | CSF levels were significantly elevated in AD compared to other dementia and lower as compared to healthy controls | ApoE levels in CSF were not associated with APOE genotype | Luminex multiplex assay |
Rezeli et al. [73] | AD (n = 13) and non-AD (n = 12) | No significant difference between study groups | ApoE levels in CSF were not associated with APOE genotype; CSF levels positively correlated with P-tau in ε4 non-carriers | Mass spectrometry |
Richens et al. [74] | AD (n = 10) and controls (n = 18) | No significant difference between study groups | Luminex multiplex assay | |
Toledo et al. [75] | Normal controls (n = 92), MCI (n = 149) and AD (n = 69) | CSF apoE levels were associated with cognitive decline and atrophy rate | Results were only significant in the group without the ε4 allele | Luminex multiplex assay |
Perrin et al. [76] | Cognitively normal [clinical dementia rating (CDR 0, n = 24) and mild AD or probable AD (CDR 1, n = 24)] | Did not differ significantly between the two groups | ELISA | |
Zhang et al. [61] | AD (n = 48), Parkinson’s disease (PD, n = 40), controls (n = 95) | Reduced in AD as compared to controls, but did not differ from PD | Multiplex assay | |
Hesse et al. [68] | AD patients (n = 55) and normal controls (n = 21) | Reduced in AD as compared to the controls | Individuals having ε4 allele had higher apoE levels | ELISA |
Fukuyama et al. [66] | AD patients, n = 25 [early onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) and late onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD)] and normal controls (n = 36) | ApoE levels were reduced with age in normal controls and increased in AD (more distinctly in EOAD). The elevated levels were positively correlated with decline in cognition | ELISA | |
Pirttilä et al. [64] | AD (n = 25); classified as APOE ε4 positive (n = 16) and negatives (n = 9), and as mild (n = 16) and moderate dementia (n = 9) | ApoE levels decreased with time in ε4 positives and in both mild and moderate dementia | ELISA | |
Lindh et al. [65] | AD (n = 18), MCI (n = 9), other dementia disorders (ODD, n = 9) and age-matched healthy controls | Elevated in AD, MCI and ODD as compared to healthy controls and significantly increased in AD at follow-up | CSF levels significantly correlated with CSF tau in AD | ELISA |
Merched et al. [67] | AD (n = 38), controls (n = 31) and those suffering from other neurological disorders (n = 47) | Significantly elevated in patients with LOAD as compared to controls and other neurological disorders | ELISA | |
Landen et al. [63] | EOAD (n = 23), LOAD (n = 31), frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 16), vascular dementia (VaD, n = 25) and controls (n = 25) | Significantly reduced in all the groups compared to the controls, in EOAD compared to LOAD and FTD | ApoE levels in CSF were not influenced by APOE genotype | ELISA |
Blennow et al. [62] | AD (n = 11), FTD (n = 10) and controls (n = 10) | Significantly reduced in AD as compared to the controls and FTD group. Also, significantly reduced in FTD as compared to controls | ELISA |