Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 2;21(12):2329–2344. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000678

Table 2.

Characteristics of the sample of 14–16-year-old adolescents (n 988) from six secondary schools (three intervention schools, three control schools) in two (matched) cities, ‘Snack Track School’ app intervention, Flanders, Belgium, January–April 2016

Control group (n 572) Intervention group (n 416)
Mean sd Mean sd
Age (years) 14·91 0·08 14·96 0·10
BMI Z-score 0·13 0·04 0·08 0·06
Sensitivity to reward (range 4–16) 8·65 0·26 9·28 0·11
Boys (%) 57·87 61·52
General education (%) 34·62 30·77
Technical education (%) 51·92 43·99
Vocational education (%) 13·46 25·24
Healthy snack ratio 43·29 2·78 39·88 5·13
Awareness (range 0–4) 2·10 0·03 2·02 0·06
Intention (range 1–5) 3·43 0·09 3·25 0·20
Attitude taste (range 1–5) 3·17 0·02 2·99 0·09
Attitude health (range 1–5) 3·70 0·08 3·64 0·14
Self-efficacy (range 1–5) 3·56 0·07 3·42 0·10
Habit (range 1–5) 2·89 0·09 2·82 0·04
Knowledge about the healthiness of snacks (range 0–100) 25·26 0·66 25·03 0·30

Adjusted for clustering (three clusters per group).