Table 2.

Department level Pearson correlation coefficient matrices for FOCUS 1.0 and FOCUS 2.0

	1.Percent fire runs	2.Percent EMS runs	3.Annual call volume	4.Roster size	5.Population served	6.Engagement—EMS	7.Engagement—fire	8.Job Satisfaction	9.Safety Behavior	10.Safety Compliance	11.Management Commitment	12.Supervisor Support
FOCUS 1.0 (n = 269 departments)
1.Percent fire runs	1.00
2.Percent EMS runs	− 0.71	1.00
3.Annual call volume	− 0.11	0.15	1.00
4.Roster size	− 0.14	0.11	0.58	1.00
5.Population served	− 0.10	0.12	0.69	0.73	1.00
6.Engagement on an EMS runs	0.17	− 0.07	− 0.19	− 0.18	− 0.20	1.00
7.Engagement on a fire runs	0.14	− 0.22	− 0.05	− 0.05	− 0.05	0.61	1.00
8.Job Satisfaction	0.14	− 0.09	0.03	0.03	0.07	0.41	0.47	1.00
9.Safety Behavior	0.06	− 0.06	− 0.25	− 0.19	− 0.24	0.28	0.21	0.32	1.00
10.Safety Compliance	− 0.12	0.04	− 0.14	0.03	− 0.08	0.15	0.11	0.03	0.59	1.00
11.Management Commitment	0.28	− 0.24	− 0.34	− 0.32	− 0.31	0.51	0.41	0.67	0.48	0.01	1.00
12.Supervisor Support	0.04	− 0.12	0.03	0.06	0.06	0.37	0.53	0.62	0.43	0.22	0.49	1.00
FOCUS 2.0 (n = 168 departments)
1.Percent fire runs	1.00
2.Percent EMS runs	− 0.73	1.00
3.Annual call volume	− 0.10	0.12	1.00
4.Roster size	− 0.11	0.13	0.88	1.00
5.Population served	− 0.14	0.06	0.58	0.57	1.00
6.Engagement on an EMS runs	0.23	− 0.06	− 0.16	− 0.16	− 0.13	1.00
7.Engagement on a fire runs	0.11	− 0.25	− 0.06	− 0.09	− 0.03	0.41	1.00
8.Job Satisfaction	0.13	− 0.16	0.002	− 0.01	0.003	0.32	0.32	1.00
9.Safety Behavior	0.07	− 0.15	− 0.17	− 0.25	− 0.07	− 0.03	0.08	0.33	1.00
10.Safety Compliance	− 0.09	0.06	− 0.02	− 0.09	0.02	− 0.08	0.11	0.004	0.61	1.00
11.Management Commitment	0.25	− 0.31	− 0.30	− 0.33	− 0.17	0.37	0.23	0.69	0.44	− 0.11	1.00
12.Supervisor Support	0.11	− 0.19	− 0.07	− 0.10	0.02	0.21	0.33	0.54	0.40	0.16	0.43	1.00

Bolded values indicate moderate (0.50–0.69) and high (0.70–0.99) correlations