Skip to main content
. 2024 May 21;23:340. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02001-z

Table 2.

Comparison of demographic and professional information between the two study groups

Variables Categories Intervention Control X2a P-value b
n % n %
Age groups 20–30 9 25.8 8 22.9 0.9 0.95
31–40 13 37.1 14 40
≥ 41 13 37.1 13 37.1
Gender Male 3 8.6 6 17.1 1.14 0.28
Female 32 91.4 29 82.9
Work position Nurse 32 91.4 31 88.6 5.6 0.13
Head nurse 1 2.9 2 5.7
Supervisors 2 5.7 2 5.7
Type of employment Committed 3 8.6 4 11.4 2.02 0.73
Temporary-to-permanent 3 8.6 3 8.6
Contract recruiters 5 14.9 2 5.8
Hired (permanent) 24 68.6 26 74.2
Shift work Fixed 2 5.7 4 11.4 0.72 0.39
Rotating 33 94.3 31 88.6
Type of ward

Emergency

children

0

5

0

14.3

2

3

5.7

8.6

9.34 0.053
Women 13 37.1 4 11.4
Men 15 42.9 24 68.36
Supervisory 2 5.7 2 5.7
Education level Bachelor 30 85.7 28 80 5.46 0.14
Master 5 14.3 7 20
Work experience (years) ˂10 10 28.6 7 20.6 1.53 0.46
10–20 22 62.9 21 61.8
≥ 21 3 8.5 6 17.6
Attendance at previous training on cultural care Yes 5 14.3 2 5.7 1.42 0.23
No 30 85.7 33 94.3
The level of care for culturally diverse people in clinical settings Moderately 18 51.4 17 48.6 1.51 0.46
High 10 28.6 14 40
Very high 7 20 4 11.4
Ethnic and racial background Native of Kerman province 32 91.4 29 82.9 3.14 0.2
Others 3 8.6 6 17.1

Note. a: chi-square/fisher exact test, and b: Bold p-values are significant at level of ≤ 0.05