Table 1:
Potential stakeholder actions to mitigate effects of physician-industry conflict of interest. DHHS, Department of Health and Human Services.
Strategic approach | PREVENTION | REGULATION | SANCTIONS/RESTITUTION |
---|---|---|---|
Timing of intervention | Stop conflicts from ever arising before they occur | Supervise conflicts during their occurrence | Penalize actors after an inappropriate conflict occurs |
Examples of specific actions, and the applicable stakeholder |
Industry: Self-regulation to curtail types of payments empirically demonstrated to conflict with PhRMA Code’s “independence and decision-making” language Physicians: Self-regulation to curtail the most harmful kinds of payments Lawmakers: New legislation to prospectively prohibit industry payments |
Payers: Exclude payment-accepting physicians from preferred networks Payers: Apply additional prior authorization and step therapy requirements to non-generic prescriptions by payment-accepting physicians |
DHHS, Office of Inspector General / Department of Justice: Prosecute a broader range of industry payments to physicians as illegal kickbacks and/or false claims DHHS, Office of Inspector General: Exclude payment-accepting physicians from reimbursement through the Federal Health Care Programs |